• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore is a ‘maid economy’ - more like a maid abuse economy.

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
6,464
Points
0
The Heartache of the Migrant Nanny
By FRANCESCA SEGRÈ
August 13, 2012, 2:13 PM
NYTimes
http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com


Domestic workers: the nannies, cooks and cleaners that make many families’ lives so much better, are at a high risk of being abused and exploited. Because the work they do takes place in private homes, they are invisible and often can’t get government protection.On Aug. 6, the International Labor Organization’s Convention on Domestic Work was ratified – setting international standards to protect the world’s 50 million to 100 million domestic workers.

The freelance reporter and mother Francesca Segre was an employer of a domestic worker in Singapore until two weeks ago, when she moved back home to California. Today she is cheering the Convention, knowing that domestic workers, who are often mothers themselves, need every bit of recognition and protection they can get. What follows are her thoughts based on her personal experiences:

To have a live-in nanny, cook and housekeeper is not a fantasy in Singapore, it’s a reality. On this modern island nation, one in every five families employs a migrant domestic worker, including our ex-pat American family of four.

Singapore is a ‘maid economy’ — a place where the government welcomes hundreds of thousands of women from poor countries in so that professionals in the formal labor sector are freed up to work long hours and pump up the country’s gross domestic product. Luz , a reserved, intelligent 34-year-old Filipina from a poor farming family, moved into our high-rise apartment two years ago. One of nine children, not yet married, and with no jobs in her village, she tells me she decided to leave home rather than continue to help at her widowed mother’s grocery stall.

Thoughtful and organized, she was a wonder in our home. She toilet-trained our son when he was one and a half, taught herself American-style cooking, and cleans to meet her standards, which far outshine my own. Careful, calm and hard working, she was, and is, a role model.

At first I felt guilty for all she did. Then I became grateful, not just for how she helped us, but for basic elements of my own family life. Hard work, low pay and heartache are built into the jobs of migrant domestic workers. As a mother to two young children, it is the heartache that rattles me most.

Luz didn’t leave children at home, but many maids do. Women from countries like the Philippines and Indonesia come to the agonizing realization that they must work abroad if they want to provide adequate food, education and health care for their families. In the Philippines, for example, jobs are scarce and a mother can earn multiples more working abroad than at home. In Singapore, the average salary for a domestic worker is $300 a month, in American dollars. They’d be lucky to make a third of that for the same job in the Philippines.

Rosalyn, 39, who lives in my Singapore neighborhood, has been apart from her own children for seven years. She told me she pays an aunt in the Philippines to raise her children, ages 4, 11 and 14. “The first time I went away, I cried every night,” she says. “I still have the instinct of a mother. If they are sick, I am not there to hug them.” It breaks her heart to hear them cry on the phone, she says.

When, days after I talked with Rosalyn, my own 4-year-old daughter woke crying in the night with a painful ear infection, I felt the luxury of comforting my own child. That night, I held my daughter tight and wept into her hair for the mothers who must choose between supporting or soothing their children.

As if the heartache of leaving a child behind isn’t wrenching enough, these migrant women are often treated as lower-class citizens when they arrive in Singapore. When we first moved here, we were shown apartments for rent, and told that the claustrophobic bomb-shelters off the kitchens could be used for “storage or for a maid’s room.” Domestic workers are virtually the only workers in Singapore who aren’t legally entitled to a day off (yet). And some bosses keep their employee’s salary ‘for them.’ Over dinner one night, Luz revealed that her previous employer kept her passport, work permit and cellphone, ensuring that even if she wanted to leave, she couldn’t. That same employer had her eat alone on separate cutlery. They hadn’t given her enough to eat — for years.

Returning home after years of working abroad can be crushing. These nannies must say goodbye to an employer’s children on whom they have heaped their pent-up love for their own families. We’re moving back to the U.S. soon, and lately I’ve noticed Luz hugging my children more often and longer. She wants more pictures with them, too. And when married nannies finally do go home, they find husbands and fathers have often disappeared in their prolonged absence. Perhaps more upsetting is returning to children who believe they have been abandoned while mom has been working abroad. Sociologists call this phenomenon a ‘care gain’ for the employers of nannies, and a ‘care drain’ on the families back home.

Yet dreams and desperation keep women coming to Singapore and other maid economies globally. Sally, a friend’s domestic worker, left the Philippines when her son was 3 and didn’t see him again until he was 6. Her son’s father vanished in her absence. But in those three years, she’s earned enough to pay for her son’s schooling and to buy a house in Manila which she rents out – things she says she never could have afforded had she stayed put. Despite the heartache, she stands firm that leaving home was the best choice for her son’s future.

Employing Luz has been an incredible help. Having her in our home has also meant playing a part in the complex web of forces that push women to leave their own families and work for another. Labor migration, I have come to believe, is not clearly good or bad. It is a risky stop-gap measure to stave off poverty with the potential to break free from it.

Since I haven’t figured out how to create enough decent jobs in developing countries so women can stay in their home country and support their own families, I have done what I can to help Luz. Like other employers, we have paid for her to go to schools like aidha, which teach domestic workers financial management and leadership. We have lent her funds to start a rice business back home. And we remind her, as constantly as she reminds us, how capable she is.

Francesca Segrè is a freelance reporter who just earned her Master’s Degree at the LKY School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.
 
spore maid agencies are no better than the slave traders of the 1600s.

both the maids and employers are screwed by these modern days slave traders. just sit on their bums and fill some paper works and one year of the maid salary go to the slave traders coffer. pui..pui..pui..:mad:
 
Put up your hands those of U demanding a minimum wage from the government

Now put up your hands if U are willing to pay Maids minimum wage
 
That why must make mandatory maid must have 2 day off per month. Every 3 month must report the agent office/MOM directly so she have at least one chance every 3 month to report ant abuse.
 
We are a pirate port and we deal in slaves in the international arena? You have a problem with that, talk to LKY. His family is the pirate captain here.
 
The Heartache of the Migrant Nanny
By FRANCESCA SEGRÈ
August 13, 2012, 2:13 PM
NYTimes
http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com


Domestic workers: the nannies, cooks and cleaners that make many families’ lives so much better, are at a high risk of being abused and exploited. Because the work they do takes place in private homes, they are invisible and often can’t get government protection.On Aug. 6, the International Labor Organization’s Convention on Domestic Work was ratified – setting international standards to protect the world’s 50 million to 100 million domestic workers.

The freelance reporter and mother Francesca Segre was an employer of a domestic worker in Singapore until two weeks ago, when she moved back home to California. Today she is cheering the Convention, knowing that domestic workers, who are often mothers themselves, need every bit of recognition and protection they can get. What follows are her thoughts based on her personal experiences:

To have a live-in nanny, cook and housekeeper is not a fantasy in Singapore, it’s a reality. On this modern island nation, one in every five families employs a migrant domestic worker, including our ex-pat American family of four.

Singapore is a ‘maid economy’ — a place where the government welcomes hundreds of thousands of women from poor countries in so that professionals in the formal labor sector are freed up to work long hours and pump up the country’s gross domestic product. Luz , a reserved, intelligent 34-year-old Filipina from a poor farming family, moved into our high-rise apartment two years ago. One of nine children, not yet married, and with no jobs in her village, she tells me she decided to leave home rather than continue to help at her widowed mother’s grocery stall.

Thoughtful and organized, she was a wonder in our home. She toilet-trained our son when he was one and a half, taught herself American-style cooking, and cleans to meet her standards, which far outshine my own. Careful, calm and hard working, she was, and is, a role model.

At first I felt guilty for all she did. Then I became grateful, not just for how she helped us, but for basic elements of my own family life. Hard work, low pay and heartache are built into the jobs of migrant domestic workers. As a mother to two young children, it is the heartache that rattles me most.

Luz didn’t leave children at home, but many maids do. Women from countries like the Philippines and Indonesia come to the agonizing realization that they must work abroad if they want to provide adequate food, education and health care for their families. In the Philippines, for example, jobs are scarce and a mother can earn multiples more working abroad than at home. In Singapore, the average salary for a domestic worker is $300 a month, in American dollars. They’d be lucky to make a third of that for the same job in the Philippines.

Rosalyn, 39, who lives in my Singapore neighborhood, has been apart from her own children for seven years. She told me she pays an aunt in the Philippines to raise her children, ages 4, 11 and 14. “The first time I went away, I cried every night,” she says. “I still have the instinct of a mother. If they are sick, I am not there to hug them.” It breaks her heart to hear them cry on the phone, she says.

When, days after I talked with Rosalyn, my own 4-year-old daughter woke crying in the night with a painful ear infection, I felt the luxury of comforting my own child. That night, I held my daughter tight and wept into her hair for the mothers who must choose between supporting or soothing their children.

As if the heartache of leaving a child behind isn’t wrenching enough, these migrant women are often treated as lower-class citizens when they arrive in Singapore. When we first moved here, we were shown apartments for rent, and told that the claustrophobic bomb-shelters off the kitchens could be used for “storage or for a maid’s room.” Domestic workers are virtually the only workers in Singapore who aren’t legally entitled to a day off (yet). And some bosses keep their employee’s salary ‘for them.’ Over dinner one night, Luz revealed that her previous employer kept her passport, work permit and cellphone, ensuring that even if she wanted to leave, she couldn’t. That same employer had her eat alone on separate cutlery. They hadn’t given her enough to eat — for years.

Returning home after years of working abroad can be crushing. These nannies must say goodbye to an employer’s children on whom they have heaped their pent-up love for their own families. We’re moving back to the U.S. soon, and lately I’ve noticed Luz hugging my children more often and longer. She wants more pictures with them, too. And when married nannies finally do go home, they find husbands and fathers have often disappeared in their prolonged absence. Perhaps more upsetting is returning to children who believe they have been abandoned while mom has been working abroad. Sociologists call this phenomenon a ‘care gain’ for the employers of nannies, and a ‘care drain’ on the families back home.

Yet dreams and desperation keep women coming to Singapore and other maid economies globally. Sally, a friend’s domestic worker, left the Philippines when her son was 3 and didn’t see him again until he was 6. Her son’s father vanished in her absence. But in those three years, she’s earned enough to pay for her son’s schooling and to buy a house in Manila which she rents out – things she says she never could have afforded had she stayed put. Despite the heartache, she stands firm that leaving home was the best choice for her son’s future.

Employing Luz has been an incredible help. Having her in our home has also meant playing a part in the complex web of forces that push women to leave their own families and work for another. Labor migration, I have come to believe, is not clearly good or bad. It is a risky stop-gap measure to stave off poverty with the potential to break free from it.

Since I haven’t figured out how to create enough decent jobs in developing countries so women can stay in their home country and support their own families, I have done what I can to help Luz. Like other employers, we have paid for her to go to schools like aidha, which teach domestic workers financial management and leadership. We have lent her funds to start a rice business back home. And we remind her, as constantly as she reminds us, how capable she is.

Francesca Segrè is a freelance reporter who just earned her Master’s Degree at the LKY School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.


I can't help but feel that Francesca Segrè is imposing her American norms on us.

She must understand that NOBODY force the domestic maids to come her. They came here on their volition because the money she makes her is a lot. I think even their houseman doctors do not make a fraction of her Singapore wage. Maid used to be paid $150 but now it is $500 plus levy of $265 - together it is $765 which is a huge amount. So is there exploitation?

The employers here put up with all sorts of nonsense from the maids - boyfriend, pregnancy, theft, uncompleted contract & runaway to embassy for absurd protection/demands; if employer breaks contract he has to pay damages n cost but if maid broke contract, there is NO compensation and more often than not, employer must provide her with airticket.

If we are bad as employers, what is it with Malaysia, RI or RP which is far worse than us.

Last but not least if she felt that bad, why did she continue to have a maid? Why didn't she set her maid free or better still send her home and continue to pay her salary.

Why can't she understand that if Singapore did not employ these maids, most of them will starve and their families too. We employ them so that they can survive! Without us (paying more than Malaysia do...) there will be a lot more financially distressed families in RI, RP, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, etcv. Therefore I am asserting that we are doing our ASEAN neighbours a favour. Also I suspect that american woman wrote not from conscience but out of desire to stand out journalistically. Bah!
 
spore maid agencies are no better than the slave traders of the 1600s.

both the maids and employers are screwed by these modern days slave traders. just sit on their bums and fill some paper works and one year of the maid salary go to the slave traders coffer. pui..pui..pui..:mad:

YES.... these vultures are crooks n cheat; do not add value but costs..... get into problem, they will tell you too bad!!
 
Another bullcrap left wing bleeding heart liberal shit article,,,if spore have no need for maids, these foreigners will starve in their home country,,,sometimes, these women instead of working etc,,they chose to have kids 1st,,than work overseas,,of course after years of being apart,,their children and family sure view them as strangers,,,this is natural,,if they want to work overseas,,dont have kids 1st lah,,and many in the 3rd world breed like rabbits,,have kids 1st than work out how to survive,,no wonder these countries are still 3rd world,,,

I can't help but feel that Francesca Segrè is imposing her American norms on us.

She must understand that NOBODY force the domestic maids to come her. They came here on their volition because the money she makes her is a lot. I think even their houseman doctors do not make a fraction of her Singapore wage. Maid used to be paid $150 but now it is $500 plus levy of $265 - together it is $765 which is a huge amount. So is there exploitation?

The employers here put up with all sorts of nonsense from the maids - boyfriend, pregnancy, theft, uncompleted contract & runaway to embassy for absurd protection/demands; if employer breaks contract he has to pay damages n cost but if maid broke contract, there is NO compensation and more often than not, employer must provide her with airticket.

If we are bad as employers, what is it with Malaysia, RI or RP which is far worse than us.

Last but not least if she felt that bad, why did she continue to have a maid? Why didn't she set her maid free or better still send her home and continue to pay her salary.

Why can't she understand that if Singapore did not employ these maids, most of them will starve and their families too. We employ them so that they can survive! Without us (paying more than Malaysia do...) there will be a lot more financially distressed families in RI, RP, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, etcv. Therefore I am asserting that we are doing our ASEAN neighbours a favour. Also I suspect that american woman wrote not from conscience but out of desire to stand out journalistically. Bah!
 
Put it this way, if you ask a local to work OT in office after 5 or come back weekend, he/she will complain as if their life was at stake. Complain that pay is not enough to cover. Not paid enough, boss inhuman etc. Basically kpkb all the way.

Yet they expect the maid to work 24/7/365 for peanuts?
 
Maids are here to work as maids,,that is the terms and maids dont work 24/7..she gets the job done, she rests that is it,,this is the same everywhere especially in their home country..if they dont want to work as maids, go get another job,,no one forcing them,,please note all their meals and expenses are covered by the employer..so write your left wing liberal bull crap somewhere else,,,

Put it this way, if you ask a local to work OT in office after 5 or come back weekend, he/she will complain as if their life was at stake. Complain that pay is not enough to cover. Not paid enough, boss inhuman etc. Basically kpkb all the way.

Yet they expect the maid to work 24/7/365 for peanuts?
 
Put up your hands those of U demanding a minimum wage from the government

Now put up your hands if U are willing to pay Maids minimum wage

This does not alter the fact that there is a value placed on household chores. Importing cheap foreign labour to perform this work is simply distorting the true value of the work. Same goes for construction workers, cleaners, garbage collectors, etc.

The angmohs used slavery, then coolies and then globalisation to perpetuate this but you will notice that only the very rich and powerful have live-in house servants. This is also the case in ancient China. It is going a step backwards when ordinary peasants can also have live-in servants. This is happening because we allow the government to dictate to us what is higher value work. You need to ask yourself is it really to your advantage by neglecting household chores in favour of other more "economically valuable" work? Naturally, Sgreans will try to squeeze every ounce of benefit out of the maids in order to realise this advantage but lose their humanity in the process. Of course, this doesn't apply if you are rich enough to afford house servants without having to commit yourself to a replacement work activity.

My take is that peasants should not be allowed to have maids. Allowing maids will only play into the hands of the rich and powerful to continue exploiting the masses.
 
Last edited:
This is happening because we allow the government to dictate to us what is higher value work.

There are many who have subscribed to the theory that stating the obvious and making motherhood statements is higher value work.
Don't be too surprised at what they would believe or how they are dictated to.
 
Minus the maid's levy first then say.:oIo:

in general, people are selfish. many over here complain about FT and yet they themselves have a maid at home.
they may argued that no singaporeans want to be a maid but they didnt apply this rule to other positions such as cleaners, roadsweepers or to some extent, drivers and waiters.
if one day, they started to run their own business , then they will question the government for the purpose of tightening measures for foreign workers.
 
You seem terribly emotional and personal about this maid subject. I hope it is not because of any guilt consciense being trigged in you.
 
Many maids are fox spirits.

Singapore government should not let any foreign women under 40 to work as maids here

Let those over 40 come in, maximum work ten years, no bond and levy, that would be ideal
 
Back
Top