Sikh Warrior Inderjit Singh's hard hitting speech ......

[Equalisation]

...quite a ferocious tirade after his grand entrance on a brilliant chariot ...... commenting on the pausing of any expansion but instead should be shoring up !!!:o

 

[Travellor]

...quite a ferocious tirade after his grand entrance on a brilliant chariot ...... commenting on the pausing of any expansion but instead should be shoring up !!!:o

Dun bluff la Inderjit....who gave you the speech and made you a hero champion of the people?

like it will change any fucking thing in the PAP.....wu ji just resign as a sign of protest after the PAP fuck your comments one corner and proceed uninterrupted ok? or else you are just another fucking "wayang show"...find that phrase familiar?

 

[3_M]

So will Indegrjit vote against the white paper at the end of parliament sessions?

 

[Travellor]

So will Indegrjit vote against the white paper at the end of parliament sessions?

I wouldnt hold my breath if i were you bro......

 

[laksaboy]

So will Indegrjit vote against the white paper at the end of parliament sessions?

It's more likely that he burns his turban and shave himself bald in Parliament than for that to happen.

 

[BlueBrother]

...quite a ferocious tirade after his grand entrance on a brilliant chariot ...... commenting on the pausing of any expansion but instead should be shoring up !!!:o

First, fix problems staring us in the face to reassure S'poreans: MPs
Immediate issues should take priority, some say, amid population debate

Mr. Inderjit Singh is absolutely right. This is exactly what the Gov't should be doing. The white paper is an total waste of time & resources. The idiot that started the white paper should be shot for wasting taxpapers' money and causing so much anxiety.

 

[Froggy]

So will Indegrjit vote against the white paper at the end of parliament sessions?

Its not will or will not, its he cannot if not kenna whip by his party whip

 

[mojito]

mojito approves.

Stop the growth in PRs and new citizens: PAP’s Inderjit Singh
By Shah Salimat | Yahoo! Newsroom – 2 hours 55 minutes ago

People’s Action Party’s deputy party whip Inderjit Singh on Tuesday urged the government to stop the growth in the number of permanent residents and new citizens, and focus on improving the lives of Singaporeans.

The call by the Ang Mo Kio parliament member was made Tuesday in response to the population white paper tabled for discussion in Parliament proceedings this past week. The paper’s estimate of a population of up to 6.9 million by 2030 -- of which nearly half would be made of foreigners -- has drawn heavy flak from Singaporeans, many of whom have been complaining about the rising cost of living and overcrowding in public transport.

Among the few MPs of the ruling party that have come out to criticise the white paper, Singh argued in Parliament that the government should “take a breather” from population growth for five years and solve the problems created by past economic and population policies.

“Yes, there will have to be tradeoffs of economic growth but I would rather trade some of these for a cohesive, united nation where people feel taken care of at home and are confident of their future,” said Singh.

He cited the increase of more than one million people living in Singapore over the past decade as precedence that “adding another 500,000 to 800,000 more PRs and citizens… will be disastrous and add to our already difficult infrastructure and social problems”.

Privileges and responsibilities

He also noted that Singapore already has too many PRs and are enjoying full citizen privileges without the citizen’s responsibilities. In an example of the latter, he said only around 30 per cent of all boys of PRs do national service.

In line with this, he said children of PRs must be made to do national service and that the government should make it an offence for them not to do so.

In addition, he proposed a levy of about $50,000 chargeable to PRs who buy HDB flats from the open market. Such flats could then be only resold to Singaporeans and the levy would be refunded within five years if the PR took up citizenship.

“The differentiated privileges will separate the genuine ones from those who are here for a ride. We should grant PRs to those who are most likely going to take up citizenships so these differentiated privileges should not stifle our plans to attract quality PRs and new citizens,” said Singh.

Singh also sought for more Singaporean-friendly policies such as a “Singaporean first hiring policy” as well as school and healthcare fee reductions for citizens. He also wanted the dependents policy to be reconsidered such that new young PRs would not bring their older family members to the country.

Young citizens he spoke to felt ‘demoralised’ at depressed wage levels across many income levels due to cheap foreign talent, even at the professional level, he said.

Singh also attacked national development minister Khaw Boon Wan for using a banquet analogy of overestimating population targets to cater sufficient resources for them. “If (we) overdo things and end up with a population of more than 7 million, it may be too late to stop the fast moving train of population growth when we fire up the engines of growing the population,” cautioned Singh.

High price being paid

Recalling his similar concerns in 2008, Singh urged the government once again to abandon the “instant tree mentality” of growing the population to counter declining birth rates.

“Instant trees cannot grow strong and can be uprooted in difficult times… as we cannot afford to make Singaporeans lives more difficult as a result. (I’d) rather we err on the side of caution when it comes to growing our population. We cannot keep paying a high price for planning misjudgements,” said Singh.

His ‘instant tree mentality’ remark was also voiced in Budget debates last year, when Singh called for less extreme fluctuations in foreign worker policy so that small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) would not incur high labour costs from workflow shifts.

In a similar vein, Singh attacked the Worker's Party proposal of not accepting any more foreign workers and accused it as a “zero-growth” foreign labour policy. He encouraged Dubai’s model of a transient workforce and was worried that shutting off the foreign labour tap would hurt SMEs.

“(Economic) restructuring is going to take some time. Business models cannot change overnight. If you really care about companies, you would not tighten the labour workforce any further. That is not going to accelerate restructuring; that is going to kill companies,” said Singh in response to a rebuttal by NCMP Gerald Giam.

Despite his remarks, Singh stopped short of calling outright for the white paper to not be passed in Parliament.

 

[laksaboy]

Probably a good cop-bad cop routine from the turban man, if at least to keep AMK GRC safe in 2016.

Talk is cheap. We'll see how he votes on the issue.

 

[laksaboy]

Despite his remarks, Singh stopped short of calling outright for the white paper to not be passed in Parliament.

Bravo Yahoo News. Bet you won't see this mentioned in the presstitute media.

 

[ilovesingapore]

the warrior has spoken well
let us see what will happen next
when it's time to pass motion
constipated or pure diarrhoea
well done warrior singh

 

[Travellor]

the warrior has spoken well
let us see what will happen next
when it's time to pass motion
constipated or pure diarrhoea
well done warrior singh

eh kopi since when you changed nick?

who's the syt?

 

[Mdm Tang]

...quite a ferocious tirade after his grand entrance on a brilliant chariot ...... commenting on the pausing of any expansion but instead should be shoring up !!!:o

.


This Singh worth at least S$50 M .

my guesstimate. He worry 3 years down the road , 2016 ? :(

 

[3_M]

Its not will or will not, its he cannot if not kenna whip by his party whip

He is just trying to mislead some gullible souls to believe that PAP MP can play opposition and can even be more opposition than WP and SPP

We don't need pseudo opposition like him who pretends to speak up but will vote along the party line.

 

[Travellor]

wah no wonder la... 50 mil i sure kong a lot of lanjiao way to LHL man...

he dare to piss me off I fuck him, resign from the PAP and go over to spill the beans on all the PAP shenanigans lioke a true traitor....

besides I got 15k pension to pay for my ferrari thanks to all the dumbass 60.1.

 

[ilovesingapore]

eh kopi since when you changed nick?
who's the syt?

where got changed nick
that's my sweet madam lah

 

[ilovesingapore]

no matter what we think
give the warrior singh credit for voicing the sentiments of the ground
whether wayang or not
i think warrior singh has done his part
so wait and see when the motion is put to the vote

 

[zeddy]

Please don't be fooled by this Turbanator Singh who suddenly became a Hero for the Underdogs..

At the end of the day he's still a PAP scum..

He may voice out his displeasure on the White Paper, but end of the day, he will still Lan Lan toe the party line..

 

[ilovesingapore]

party members must always toe the party's policy
otherwise all will kena hamtam until mati

 

[Mdm Tang]

.


Hard Truth :


He is the Richest Singh in Singapore , period . :(