- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 12,730
- Points
- 113
Take note of the points above:
1. Showed favour for Dr Koh Poh Koon, believing he would do well in Parliament.
2. Does not want to comment on WP's performance in Parliament.
3. In spite of #2, counter claims against WP's claim, which she did not wish to comment in the first place!
Isn't the above an in-built judgement call from the Speaker? That being the case, with the bias already embedded in her, how partial is she going to be in Parliament?
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2013/01/hey-halimah-shouldnt-you-be-impartial.html
1. Showed favour for Dr Koh Poh Koon, believing he would do well in Parliament.
2. Does not want to comment on WP's performance in Parliament.
3. In spite of #2, counter claims against WP's claim, which she did not wish to comment in the first place!
Isn't the above an in-built judgement call from the Speaker? That being the case, with the bias already embedded in her, how partial is she going to be in Parliament?
- http://wherebearsroamfree.blogspot.sg/2013/01/hey-halimah-shouldnt-you-be-impartial.html
