Shiok! TJS farked TT about ISA

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD]
icon.aspx
Coffeeshop Chit Chat - Shiok! TJS farked TT about ISA[/TD]
[TD="align: right"][/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
[TABLE="class: msgtable, width: 96%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD="class: msg"][TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR="class: msghead"]
[TD="class: msgbfr1, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD]

<TBODY>
[TD="class: msgF, width: 1%, align: right"]From: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgFname, width: 68%"] Zhenzidan <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgDate, width: 30%, align: right"]5:03 am [/TD]

[TD="class: msgT, width: 1%, align: right"]To: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgTname, width: 68%"] ALL <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgNum, align: right"](1 of 15) [/TD]

</TBODY>
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: wintiny, align: right"]55954.1 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgtxt"]Presidential candidates Dr Tony Tan and Tan Jee Say clashed over the issue of the Internal Security Act (ISA) in a heated exchange during a dialogue forum held on Thursday at the Fort Canning Centre.
Responding to a question by a participant over the arrest of 22 people under the ISA in 1987, investment advisor Tan Jee Say said, "I believe the ISA has outlived its usefulness."
"I don't even know whether it was justified in the first place because the ISA has been used on political opponents and those who (are) on the other political side of the law," he said, adding that "the history is such that it's been used for political purposes".
At this point, the usually-placid Dr Tony Tan jumped in and rebutted pointedly, "When one says this is used against political opponents, I think this is a very serious charge. You must be able to back it up."
I have been attacked on my understanding of the English language. No, no, no, Viswa, let's be fair, what's in his English dictionary about political opponents? <CITE>Tan Jee Say</CITE>​
Tan Jee Say then rose to the challenge and shot back, "The people who have been detained have opposed the government. That's what I'm saying."
Dialogue moderator Viswa Sadasivan attempted to get the latter to withhold his comments until the debate session later but an agitated Tan said, "I have been attacked on my understanding of the English language. No, no, no, Viswa, let's be fair, what's in his English dictionary about political opponents?"
Referring to Dr Tan, he went on to question, "What is in his English dictionary about political opponents?"
Dr Tan did not respond to Tan Jee Say further.
On the 1987 case in question, 22 people were arrested under the ISA and charged for a Marxist conspiracy to replace the government with a Marxist state. The ISA allows the government to arrest and detain people without trial.
During that time, Dr Tony Tan and Dr Tan Cheng Bock were part of the government as Education Minister and head of the Feedback Unit respectively, while Tan Jee Say was principal private secretary to then deputy prime minister Goh Chok Tong.
Describing the ISA as a "very blunt instrument", Dr Tan -- who has also held posts of Defence Minister and Co-ordinating Minister for Security and Defence -- said before the heated exchange that "it should only be used in the most extreme circumstances and where the government really feels that there is such a need."
"I also feel that in the present world in which we live in, needs arise where the government will have to use the ISA and only in the most extreme of circumstances," he stressed.
"This is not a comfortable statement for people to receive but that is the reality of the world today and we have to keep society safe in Singapore. We have to keep our homes safe, our people safe."
On the Marxist conspiracy, he said the cases were "very carefully discussed" in the Cabinet but declined to divulge details as they are covered under the Official Secrets Act.
"I subscribe to the principle of collective responsibility of the Cabinet. Whatever be the discussion in Cabinet, once the decision is made, it is the responsibility of the whole Cabinet to abide by the decision and take responsibility for it," said Dr Tan, noting that any future steps on the matter depends on the new information made available.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: msgopt, width: 24%"] Options[/TD]
[TD="class: msgrde, width: 50%, align: center"]Reply[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
 
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR="class: msghead"]
[TD="class: msgbfr1, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD]

<TBODY>
[TD="class: msgF, width: 1%, align: right"]From: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgFname, width: 68%"] BigOrSmall <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgDate, width: 30%, align: right"]7:20 am [/TD]

[TD="class: msgT, width: 1%, align: right"]To: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgTname, width: 68%"] AhFooksays <NOBR></NOBR>unread[/TD]
[TD="class: msgNum, align: right"](4 of 15) [/TD]

</TBODY>
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: wintiny, align: right"]55954.4 in reply to 55954.2 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgtxt"]When Tan Jee Say is speaking Tony Tan just butt in and when Tan Jee Say want to reply back he is stopped by the Pro-PAP Moderator Viswa.KNNCCB Viswa !!!
Tony Tan detained , tortured and framed the 22 true-blue innocent singaporeans without any evidence.Till today the innocent detained singaporeans have not been proven guilty as the PAP do not have any shred of evidence against them.U do not use the ISA against any singapore citizen just because u do not like his face.This is what happened in singapore and now Tony Tan the evil culprit coward and mastermind have not repent and now he want to represent and take care of the interests of singaporeans ??? Sure ??? So bloody thick-skinned !!!
Seeing him acting so arrogantly,I have an impulse to spit on him or give him a tight slap.
KNNCCB Tony Tan !!! U are a Christian ??? U are a disgrace !!!
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: msgopt, width: 24%"] Options[/TD]
[TD="class: msgrde, width: 50%, align: center"]Reply[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
 
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR="class: msghead"]
[TD]

<TBODY>
[TD="class: msgF, width: 1%, align: right"]From: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgFname, width: 68%"] Zhenzidan <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgDate, width: 30%, align: right"]9:33 am [/TD]

[TD="class: msgT, width: 1%, align: right"]To: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgTname, width: 68%"] SgParent <NOBR></NOBR>unread[/TD]
[TD="class: msgNum, align: right"](14 of 19) [/TD]

</TBODY>
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: wintiny, align: right"]55954.14 in reply to 55954.13 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: msgtxt"]A member of the audience posed the question about ISA. TT replied and vehemently defended the use of ISA but cited a weak example by using the Norway terrorist attack.
TJS then stressed that the ISA here had been used more against political opponents than against suspected terrorists. That's where the argument started.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
<TBODY>[TR]
[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: msgopt, width: 24%"] Options[/TD]
[TD="class: msgrde, width: 50%, align: center"]Reply[/TD]
[/TR]
</TBODY>[/TABLE]
 
Could you pls copy in such a way that we dont have to read down a long column when there's a lot of horiz space?
 
The ref to the Norwegian case is a straw man argument used by TT. Anders Behring Breivik, actually bombed and killed 93 people at a youth camp, whereas those 22 were branded marxist conspirators who had not committed any crimes and were denied all legal recourse. Different people who probably didnt know one another were all strung together and framed, and confessions extorted to build up a phony case because the State could not back down once the arrest had gone public. So the govt used every apparatus in the huge govt machinery to force the case thru, imposing a muzzle on the Press to dig further at the real truth.
 
Could you pls copy in such a way that we dont have to read down a long column when there's a lot of horiz space?
He only knows how to cut and paste - didn't use his brain. He sees any distance semblance to anti-PAP, anti-Singapore article and he will cut and paste here.
running-with-scissors-mobile-wallpaper.jpg
 
Is a presidential candidate who "fark" his opponents worthy of being a president of a country?

No diplomacy, no tact, no manners, quarrelsome - qualified to be a President? If voted a President, he will "fark" all the leaders of the world he doesn't like them - and even all his countrymen. Is this good for the country?
 
Last edited:
Is a presidential candidate who "fark" his opponents worthy of being a president of a country?

No diplomacy, no tact, no manners, quarrelsome - qualified to be a President? If voted a President, he will "fark" all the leaders of the world he doesn't like them - and even all his countrymen. Is this good for the country?
I dun think he will fark all leaders, that is just your own sinkie presumption.

He just have to balls to tell the truth that affects the hearts of all people and that is taking an early step to speak and taking care of the welfare of the people. The sinkieiness in you just cannot see that. What a pity!!

Currently, to have your PAP master having their hands of the people's hard earned money and reserve is not doing good for the welfare of your country.

Shin crop ??? what happen, the thais protest like mad. ONly a sinkie will disturb another countries business and then getting conned in the end. wahahah.

i dun think there is any left in the CPF, PAP is just buying time and let TJS show it all to the people.
 
MAKAPAA please post nicely. Very hard to read and wasting space. Anyone here can teach him how to cut and paste?
 
MAKAPAA please post nicely. Very hard to read and wasting space. Anyone here can teach him how to cut and paste?

Why don't you copy and paste his article in the next post properly to your taste so everyone can read?
 
Is a presidential candidate who "fark" his opponents worthy of being a president of a country?

No diplomacy, no tact, no manners, quarrelsome - qualified to be a President? If voted a President, he will "fark" all the leaders of the world he doesn't like them - and even all his countrymen. Is this good for the country?

I agree with you, wholeheartedly. The diplomatic, tactful and gentleman way is to get plainclothes policemen to knock on the doors of his opponent's house 3 am in the morning, harass his family, detain him without trial, muzzle the press and sue him bankrupt.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top