sharon au not happy

[kaninabuchaojibye]

 

[nayr69sg]

Sinkieland is right wing capital of the world.

Dont let those people living in sinkieland fool you that they are leftist. Bullshit.

 

[LITTLEREDDOT]

Sheryl Au, not Sharon Au

 

[laksaboy]

I don't believe in gay marriage and I think the 'right to love' rhetoric is silly, but I think it's stupid to confine the homos to Hong Lim Park for their annual gathering. At least let them go to Sentosa and have a proper pride parade lah.

 

[Rogue Trader]

Sinkieland is right wing capital of the world.

Dont let those people living in sinkieland fool you that they are leftist. Bullshit.

Nothing wrong with a conservative society. Two genders was nature's way for the past millions of years.

Only your hippie prime minister would support 63 genders. Good luck to the next generation of leaflets

 

[eatshitndie]

it’s not just about ideological politics. it’s the confusion, complexity, and convolution in city hall (like in sf) as to how to administer and legalize the union and marriage of two individuals who are lgbtq when dealing with contracts, leases, home ownership, escrow, loans, all legal implications. for example, what to do and how to draft the contract when the couple comprises a transgendered and a transvestite? it’s not just lesbian marrying lesbian or gay guy marrying gay guy anymore. the lgbtq community has morphed and sexpanded to include all kinds of combination and creation of new “identities”, of which some are hybrids, some are in blurry definition, and others are changelings. need to keep it stupid and simple as in the “kiss” principle. otherwise, how to administer a civil society and gov?

 

[pvtpublic]

it’s not just about ideological politics. it’s the confusion, complexity, and convolution in city hall (like in sf) as to how to administer and legalize the union and marriage of two individuals who are lgbtq when dealing with contracts, leases, home ownership, escrow, loans, all legal implications. for example, what to do and how to draft the contract when the couple comprises a transgendered and a transvestite? it’s not just lesbian marrying lesbian or gay guy marrying gay guy anymore. the lgbtq community has morphed and sexpanded to include all kinds of combination and creation of new “identities”, of which some are hybrids, some are in blurry definition, and others are changelings. need to keep it stupid and simple as in the “kiss” principle. otherwise, how to administer a civil society and gov?

Contractual obligations is a lame excuse against accepting the various combinations of genders. It's nothing the lawyers can't fix with ease.

Gender is seldom the basis of contracts. All you need is an ic number or social security number.

 

[eatshitndie]

Contractual obligations is a lame excuse against accepting the various combinations of genders. It's nothing the lawyers can't fix with ease.

Gender is seldom the basis of contracts. All you need is an ic number or social security number.

aiyah, you either ignore the details or are ignorant of the legislative minefields to get there. in sf’s case, the century old law that was written for a man and his wife in domestic disputes and contracts had to be modified by a legislative majority (and not vetoed by executive branch or challenged in courts by lawsuits) to accommodate the “domestic union” of same-sex partners to benefit from clauses and terms associated with “community property” vs. “joint tenancy”, especially in tax matters. “same-sex” then became an issue when transgenders marrying transgenders of the opposite sex claimed they were being discriminated by the new language of “same-sex”. and it went back to legislature for debate, wasted everyone’s time and money, and the shit started all over again. it hamstrings and holds the gov hostage from doing real work for the city, and instead it pins gov down with endless need for legislative sessions, debates, language rewrites, plus countless retroactive contracts and agreements that were signed in the past. fecking headaches for the city. thus sf has gone to the dogs. there’s no end in sight when one new identity advocate whines and sues the gov next day for not including them in the day-old new legislation. and it’s not like the lgbtq community in sf is united as a common advocacy group. lesbians hate transgenders (male to female) as they encroach into their space (and toilets), and gay purists dislike the bisexuals as they “contaminate” the gay spas with sometimes tragic consequences. transgenders have issues with transvestites as they deem the latter as “revertable” hybrids without the dough and guts and to commit to sex change surgeries. and each group wants legislation to take care of them specifically at the cost of other groups. only way around this is to do away with gender identity altogether, i.e. everyone is sexless, but is that practical?

 

[ginfugly]

au ah au

 

[pvtpublic]

aiyah, you either ignore the details or are ignorant of the legislative minefields to get there. in sf’s case, the century old law that was written for a man and his wife in domestic disputes and contracts had to be modified by a legislative majority (and not vetoed by executive branch or challenged in courts by lawsuits) to accommodate the “domestic union” of same-sex partners to benefit from clauses and terms associated with “community property” vs. “joint tenancy”, especially in tax matters. “same-sex” then became an issue when transgenders marrying transgenders of the opposite sex claimed they were being discriminated by the new language of “same-sex”. and it went back to legislature for debate, wasted everyone’s time and money, and the shit started all over again. it hamstrings and holds the gov hostage from doing real work for the city, and instead it pins gov down with endless need for legislative sessions, debates, language rewrites, plus countless retroactive contracts and agreements that were signed in the past. fecking headaches for the city. thus sf has gone to the dogs. there’s no end in sight when one new identity advocate whines and sues the gov next day for not including them in the day-old new legislation. and it’s not like the lgbtq community in sf is united as a common advocacy group. lesbians hate transgenders (male to female) as they encroach into their space (and toilets), and gay purists dislike the bisexuals as they “contaminate” the gay spas with sometimes tragic consequences. transgenders have issues with transvestites as they deem the latter as “revertable” hybrids without the dough and guts and to commit to sex change surgeries. and each group wants legislation to take care of them specifically at the cost of other groups. only way around this is to do away with gender identity altogether, i.e. everyone is sexless, but is that practical?

Wall of text. What you have described is a political problem not a legal challenge.

 

[laksaboy]

Sinkieland is right wing capital of the world.

Dont let those people living in sinkieland fool you that they are leftist. Bullshit.

The PAP government is excessively bloated and overreaching... hardly 'right wing' traits, fyi.

Also, in recent years it is especially fond of pandering and virtue signalling to political correctness (refer to Halimah, banning plastic straws). Again, these are hardly 'right wing' characteristics.

The PAP govt is no more or less 'right wing' that the PRC's CCP.

 

[eatshitndie]

Wall of text. What you have described is a political problem not a legal challenge.

do you wish to see how many legislative and politically-based bills are passed in 50 states because of this lgbtq fragmentation of their representative and individual rights? it’s also a wall of text, in fact just the titles (and links) of each bill. pages and pages long.

 

[A Singaporean]

Sheryl Au, not Sharon Au

Lumpar par lum. Same same.

 

[KuanTi01]

Simi lanjiao also petition government. Much ado about nothing! As far as I am concerned the little red dot can accomodate the pink dot. Give and take lah. No crime or offence has been committed. If you are not gay, just be yourself. No need to be anti-gay.

 

[bobby]

If you are gay just go on being a gay quietly. No point trying to make the rest of the world believe in your lifestyle.