Shanmugam vs Sylvia Lim on Woffles Wu

[tanwahp]

Go and look for Hansard records. There are reasons why PAP Minister has to mention about reading the speech on the internet and the subsequent reply follows. Handsard will provide exactly what has transpired in parliament.

I don't think this is a relevant point; I did not dispute the factuality of the proceedings in parliament and how it was reported or narrated. It is the opinions of the proceedings that I am addressing, namely the "plagiarism" part.

The thanking of the Singapore Blogger written as an After note on WP website is an after thought, after being exposed by PAP Minister that he actually plagiarised the published article. i.e. he didn't give proper credit or made known during his actual speech that this is taken from someone else website..

I don't think there is evidence to suggest that it was an "afterthought". Pritam was most protected by the fact that he received permission even before delivering that speech in parliament; there was no need to act as if some "cover up" exercise needs to be executed. (I do notice however that you moved to new points and areas to justify yourself instead of harping on debunked points, which is a good thing.)

It doesn't matter if real name or moniker or even just mention, this is from a Singaporean blogger from xxxxx blog... But the simple fact that, none of these was done.

I believe we have established that it was. I am afraid your facts are still found wanting.