Shanmugam vs Sylvia Lim on Woffles Wu

[shawna]

Nope, she didn't. she avoided his question three times.

she answered him, but with a defence

 

[zeddy]

Shan asked Sylvia three times what she thought of the 6 cases brought up that had equivalent sentences. Sylvia avoided totally a simple straight forward question. She can't debate?

Hey dickhead who is the Minister in charge? Shanmugam or Sylvia? Sylvia as an Opposition MP posed these questions to the Minister in charge, of course Shanmugam must answer lah..

Then if Shanmugam don't answer to all these queries in Parliament, then who is goin to answer? Your Ah Kong ahh?

 

[Jlokta]

Then if Shanmugam don't answer to all these queries in Parliament, then who is goin to answer? Your Ah Kong ahh?

Kinana's ah kong is very busy washing his underwear, won't have time to answer on behalf of that sham.

 

[Kinana]

Hey dickhead who is the Minister in charge? Shanmugam or Sylvia? Sylvia as an Opposition MP posed these questions to the Minister in charge, of course Shanmugam must answer lah..

Then if Shanmugam don't answer to all these queries in Parliament, then who is goin to answer? Your Ah Kong ahh?

And Shanmugan answered her with 6 examples that directly disputed her charge.
Sylvia has no replies to his clarifications. She ran away. Cannot debate. What a washout.

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Kinana's ah kong is very busy washing his underwear, won't have time to answer on behalf of that sham.

Washing old whores' soiled undies as well...his ah kong is desker road's whorehouse laundryman....his ah mah works there too....$15 a pop....bbbj without dentures.

 

[Mdm Tang]

Hey dickhead who is the Minister in charge? Shanmugam or Sylvia? Sylvia as an Opposition MP posed these questions to the Minister in charge, of course Shanmugam must answer lah..

Then if Shanmugam don't answer to all these queries in Parliament, then who is goin to answer? Your Ah Kong ahh?

.



Why involved Late President Ong Teng Cheong ?


http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread....Woffles-Wu-not-spared-because-he-s-rich/page3
Originally Posted by Goh Meng Seng
According to CNA forum, someone has found out that Dr Wu is actually nephew of late President Ong:

http://www.pachealthholdings.com/csc.../nip_tuck.html

"Dr Wu - who counts the late former president Ong Teng Cheong as his uncle, The Link's Tina Tan-Leo as his cousin, and Dick Lee and Glen Goei as his friends - has other luxuries. "


Fulle article:

Attachment 5325

How much more Nip/Tuck can we be?

They are opposites in temperament, their clientele is a who's who of the region and they jet-set in luxury cars and fly first class. JEANMARIE TAN ([email protected]) gets under the skin of plastic surgeons Dr Woffles Wu and Dr Martin Huang to find out how they resemble television's hottest surgeons in the medical drama Nip/Tuck.

They've known each other since they were teenagers, when they competed on opposing teams at a public speaking competition.

They attended medical school at the National University of Singapore together, and ended up working side-by-side at Singapore General Hospital's (SGH) plastic surgery unit. They even talked of becoming partners and setting up a practice together. Seemingly opposite in temperament and looks, they were also each other's best man.

Today, Dr Woffles Wu and Dr Martin Huang - best friends for 28 years - are considered a cut above the rest in their profession. 'How much more Nip/Tuck can we be?' Dr Wu joked to The New Paper during a joint interview with Dr Huang at his clinic at Camden Medical Centre.


TV DRAMA

In case you've been under anaesthesia for the past few weeks, Nip/Tuck is the critically-acclaimed US TV drama about two plastic surgeons/med school buddies who run a posh practice in Miami. Dr Christian Troy (Julian McMahon) is the flashy, opportunistic bad boy, and Dr Shawn McNamara (Dylan Walsh) is the upright family man.

It's hard not to compare Dr Wu and Dr Huang to their on-screen alter egos - at least on a superficial level. With his spectacles and neatly-parted hair, Dr Wu comes across as conservative. But in reality, he is the 'flamboyant, even outrageous' social butterfly, according to Dr Huang, who is with MD Specialist Healthcare at Paragon.

On the other hand, 43-year-old Dr Huang may look like a smooth playboy in his designer togs, but he's actually the introvert. And, the one who receives the most female attention. Dr Wu, 44, quipped: 'The girls love him!' He added: 'Martin's a perfectionist. There's also an elegance and grace to the way he behaves. He has a wicked sense of humour - that's why we get on so well.'

They first met in 1976 at the finals of an elocution contest, where Dr Wu represented St Andrew's Secondary School and Dr Huang, Catholic High. Over the years, they've helped each other's careers. Dr Huang was studying general surgery, but upon Dr Wu's recommendation, switched to plastic surgery. Dr Huang left SGH in 1998 to set up his own practice, Dr Wu followed suit in 2000 and relied on his pal to show him the ropes. They also share knowledge - Dr Huang has even adopted Dr Wu's famous facelift thread technique for his own patients.

But isn't there any rivalry between them? Dr Huang said: 'Yes, but there always has been. It's a healthy competition, and not an obsession where you let the one-upmanship become the end in itself.'
'If I didn't respect him, I wouldn't even want to compete with him. But because he's good, it drives me on as well and we both improve.'

But both appeared hesitant when asked if they would consider a partnership again in future. Dr Wu said: 'It's not inconceivable, but now we're in two diametrically opposite kind of business practices - a solo one and a big group.' Dr Huang added: 'I still consider us spiritual partners anyway, through our professionalism and friendship.'

Separate or co-existing, their current game plan is definitely working - just look at their rich and glamorous lifestyles. On average, both plastic surgeons work a 65-hour week, and their clientele ranges from the prominent (wives of politicians, actresses, models, lawyers, bankers) to the ordinary (students, housewives, office ladies). Dr Wu jet-sets twice a month to present his work in the US and Europe - flying first-class.

LUXURIES

Dr Wu - who counts the late former president Ong Teng Cheong as his uncle, The Link's Tina Tan-Leo as his cousin, and Dick Lee and Glen Goei as his friends - has other luxuries. Like his expensive art and sculpture collection which he stores in his bungalow-cum-warehouse at Upper Thomson, while he lives in his unrenovated 1950s family home on the same street. And then there are his two Mercedes which he has lovingly restored for $100,000 each.

And just as Dr Wu enjoys flying first-class, Dr Huang prefers to drive first-class - he owns a Porsche Boxster S and a Jaguar XJR. He is currently building a $4.5 million house at Sunset Vale and rents out an apartment at Astrid Meadows. Needless to say, these oft-quoted plastic surgeons are also very comfortable at being labelled as celebrities. Dr Huang said: 'It's not something we actively or intentionally tried to create, but it just happened naturally, which is the best way. There is also a certain glamour attached to the industry anyway.'

But with the lion's share of the spotlight constantly on Dr Wu and Dr Huang, other surgeons have been allegedly sharpening their scalpels. Both claimed that they've heard negative comments and 'backhanded compliments' through the grapevine. Dr Huang said: 'I've heard some say that I overcharge. But I charge what I feel is fair, because I put in a lot of time and effort. If you work hard, do good work, and are lucky to have a bit of talent along the way, success will just come. I suppose the danger for us is to let it all get to our heads. That's why it's important to remember all the basic things that got you there - like taking care of your patients.'

Would they go under the knife to look better?

Tell me what you don't like about yourself. That's the standard feeler question the plastic surgeons in Nip/Tuck ask their patients. Now, let's flip it back to the doctors.

Dr Wu and Dr Huang give themselves frequent skin-rejuvenating treatments like botox, fillers and IPL (intense pulse light), but are not free from physical insecurities. Dr Wu offered: 'Oh, I have a lot of issues about myself!' He had an operation on his nose 20 years ago to fix a breathing problem, and used to be bothered by his 'small head and big bum', that he was born with too few teeth and hated wearing glasses. Dr Huang has acne scars from his younger days, his ears are asymmetrical, and his eyebags are 'getting worse'. Yet, both say they aren't 'bothered enough' by their flaws, and are too 'lazy' and 'busy' to go under the knife.

In the pilot episode of Nip/Tuck, one of the surgeon's wives requests for breast implants. Luckily for Dr Wu and Dr Huang, their spouses don't have severe body image problems. Dr Wu's wife Juay Yong, a 44-year-old health policy administrator, is 'very laidback' while Dr Huang's wife Patricia, a 36-year-old ex-SIA stewardess, takes the initiative. 'She keeps asking me if she needs botox, which she doesn't! She also complains that I don't do enough for her, and it's even harder for her to get treatment from me because she has to queue up,' joked Dr Huang.

Since Nip/Tuck featured the same surgeon's teenage son demanding a circumcision, would they be willing to do vanity surgery on their own children? Dr Wu is all for it - he has a four-year-old son, Wellington, and daughter Waverly was born on Sunday. Dr Huang also expressed interest in operating on his son Alexander, who's 1 1/2. 'He doesn't have double eyelids ... But mine only appeared when I was a young adult, so there's still hope.'
Nip/Tuck is showing over Channel 5, Fridays at 11pm.

Source: The Newpaper

 

[Kinana]

Washing old whores' soiled undies as well...his ah kong is desker road's whorehouse laundryman....his ah mah works there too....$15 a pop....bbbj without dentures.

Wow, look like you fellas are stuck once confronted with facts. Need to run away to insults and spam. ahahahahahahahah.................

 

[Mdm Tang]

Wow, look like you fellas are stuck once confronted with facts. Need to run away to insults and spam. ahahahahahahahah.................

.

Please show respect to our late President Ong

 

[Kinana]

.

Please show respect to our late President Ong

You mean he was involved in this case?

 

[Narong Wongwan]

Wow, look like you fellas are stuck once confronted with facts. Need to run away to insults and spam. ahahahahahahahah.................

No insults intended.
Was just trying to get more business for your ah mah...

 

[streetsmart73]

Tin PL will speak!

"I don't know what to say!"

hi there


1. hahaha!
2. another ugly sheep will ask sylvia "what do you think?"

 

[Mdm Tang]

you mean he was involved in this case?

"what do you think ??? " , whahahahahahahahahah :d

 

[Mdm Tang]

.



.



.


http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...208018/1/.html

Law Minister explains court sentencing of Dr Woffles Wu
By :
Date : 16 June 2012 2048 hrs (SST)

URL : http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...208018/1/.html



SINGAPORE: Law Minister K. Shanmugam responded to comments that the sentence meted out to plastic surgeon Dr Woffles Wu was too lenient.

Dr Wu was fined S$1,000 on Wednesday for abetting Mr Kuan Yit Wah, then 76, to provide misleading information to the police in November 2006.

The car belonging to Dr Wu, was travelling at 91 kilometers per hour (kmph) on Adam Road when the speed limit is 70kmph.

Mr Shanmugam said the incident raises four questions.

Firstly, why Dr Wu was charged under section 81(3) of the Road Traffic Act; secondly why abetment; thirdly why he was given a fine; and lastly why there was a lapse of six years before Dr Wu was taken to task.

Mr Shanmugam explained that the offence was committed in 2006 when section 204 of the Penal Code had not been enacted yet.

The usual practice at the time was that a person would be charged under Section 81(3)

As for why Dr Wu was charged with abetment, Mr Shanmugam said the 52-year-old "did not make the misleading statements himself."

The minister said the statements in question were made by Mr Kuan, which was why the charge could only be that of abetment.

Mr Shanmugam stressed that investigations are ongoing, as to who the driver actually was and that the case has not been concluded.

He said the decision to prosecute was made by the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) and that it is independent in making those decisions.

As for sentencing, Mr Shanmugam said the courts make that decision and a fine is apparently "within the norm of usual sentences" under that charge.


Noting that there have been cases where the offender was jailed, the law minister said based on information provided by the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC), fines are more commonly meted out.

Mr Shanmugam added the reasons for the findings will not be known until there is a written judgement from the court.

And only if and when there is one, he said one can only guess at the reasons for the judgement.

In this case, he said there's no evidence of any money passing hands.

He added that Mr Kuan was also not charged and that could have been because the AGC took into account the fact that Mr Kuan is now over 80 years of age.

As for why it took six years for Dr Wu to be prosecuted, Mr Shanmugam said the police were unaware of the offences at that time.

He said information was received only much later through a complaint to the AGC, made "more recently".

Once the complaint was received, authorities investigated and thereafter the AGC decided to charge Dr Wu.

Mr Shanmugam's comments were made on the sidelines of a community event.

In a blog post, MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC Hri Kumar Nair said such offences are serious and that others who had been convicted of similar offences had been jailed.

He said Mr Shanmugam has answered some of the public's questions on the case.

But it may be useful, Mr Hri said, if the public could understand why some cases involve jail terms while some only received fines.

Turning to the case of the 25-year-old, dubbed the sticker-lady, who was arrested for vandalism, Mr Shanmugam said there are no hard and fast rules on what's considered art on public buildings.

He said the government must look at the consensus of the majority and how the majority would like society to be structured.

Charges have yet to be filed on sticker-lady, Samantha Lo.

- CNA/ck

 

[Kinana]

"what do you think ??? " , whahahahahahahahahah :d

I think Ong has nothing to do with this case. He was dead long ago.
Sylvia got to reply once confronted squarely. What do you think?

 

[streetsmart73]

Shan asked Sylvia three times what she thought of the 6 cases brought up that had equivalent sentences. Sylvia avoided totally a simple straight forward question. She can't debate?

hi there


1. yo! some 3-yr-old!
2. don't just rely on what cna published.
3. ms lim does not go in unprepared.
4. local media cherry picking!
5. unless you are cock-eyed, blind or braindead.

 

[Mdm Tang]

i think ong has nothing to do with this case. He was dead long ago.
Sylvia got to reply once confronted squarely. What do you think?

.



I think all the answer is with the


key man : Dpm teo


"what do you think ? " , whahahahahahahah

 

[Papsmearer]

I noticed that when forced to defend the system, telling lies is not Shanmugam's forte. He'll look like a deer caught in the headlights or a monkey with its paw caught in a cookie jar. Worse, he stutters like a blathering idiot. How can a man like him become a Senior Counsel and now a Law Minister? If I were his Master, I'll worry he'll give the game away. Only the Mediacorp and SPH save him by forming complete sentences for him and making sense of his incomprehensible mutterings. A real disgrace.

Notice how he had sidestepped Sylvia's question? He's truly worried that when forced to make impromptu speeches, he himself would garang kabut and say the wrong things and get nailed by the netizenry.

Sylvia also got snookered lah. When Sham bring up that 6 cases between 2004 and 2007, Sylvia should have fired by by asking how many cases between 2004 and 2007 resulted in jail terms. I bet you the number is much larger than 6, and Sylvia could have used this number to indicate its unusual.

 

[hairylee]

And Shanmugan answered her with 6 examples that directly disputed her charge.
Sylvia has no replies to his clarifications. She ran away. Cannot debate. What a washout.

Sylvia asked a question for clarification by the minister, she is not seeking a debate which is wasting time and and shamemugam tax payers salary.

 

[Narong Wongwan]

5. unless you are cock-eyed, blind or braindead.

he is all that and much more.
The fact that he is nephew of ex president needs to be highlighted as sinkieland is all about connections.

 

[Kinana]

Sylvia asked a question for clarification by the minister, she is not seeking a debate which is wasting time and and shamemugam tax payers salary.

shanmugan clarified with 6 examples and Sylvia simply ran away from them.