• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Shanmugam vs Sylvia Lim on Woffles Wu

Shanmugam tried to flip a prata in Parliament but he failed spectacularly..
 
Pritam should come out knock on Shanmugan head. Law minister vs lawyer.

Please do not compare Pritam Singh with the other man.

Singh is a young and bright man.

He is much handsome than the other.

Obviously he looks much macho than the other.

Singh can make it to Bollywood and even Hollywood.

The other person may even have Mollywood (Madras) cast him out from any audition.

Sylvia obviously did a good job.
 
When PAP ministers do not want to give a simple and straightforward answer to a simple and straightforward question,they will always respond by throwing a question at u like "What do u think ?" or "Do u agree ?" and demanding a reply from u.This is called diverting or sidetracking from the main issue.Throwing smokebomb to
confuse the main issue.We wonder how this skirt-chasing snake can be a law minister ? KNNCCB to the PAP ministers.
 
Shanmugam tried to flip a prata in Parliament but he failed spectacularly..

Shanmugam insistence to prove that Worker party would turn Singapore into Taiwan parliament and thus laughiing stock,Ms Lim and Low T K are clever and refuse to go along.
 
WP, if you're reading SBF, Well done!!

Keep it up and there might still be hope for Singapore.
 
When people are angry when confronted, it shows they have something to hide.
 
A FT auntie from HK working for WW, went jail cos stealing money from him. After her release, she had been trying very hard to take revenge on him. After 6 years, some person connected with this FT make police report on Woffles n got him into trouble.
 
I hope these MIW bastards could be less defensive about themselves and be more positive in dealing with public queries.
 
sg govt is always biased towards the rich and poor, and they always favour the angmo cows to their local delights. a $1k fine for falsifying his documents just bc woffles wu is a filthy rich man shows the legal system need to be reviewed. lying or falsifying your information according the sg legal system is always at least $5k fine and a jail term... so i m not sure why woffles wu got scott free and a peanut fine...
 
A FT auntie from HK working for WW, went jail cos stealing money from him. After her release, she had been trying very hard to take revenge on him. After 6 years, some person connected with this FT make police report on Woffles n got him into trouble.
The point being? WW kena tua by his enemy so must go lenient on him?
 
Shan asked Sylvia three times what she thought of the 6 cases brought up that had equivalent sentences. Sylvia avoided totally a simple straight forward question. She can't debate?
 
Shan asked Sylvia three times what she thought of the 6 cases brought up that had equivalent sentences. Sylvia avoided totally a simple straight forward question. She can't debate?

she did answer him, by emphasing that woffles wu not only falsifying the document one time, but a few times. so why is the legal system too lenient on the number of offences he committed. i do wonder sometimes that shanmugam tried to dodge her arguments
 
Shan asked Sylvia three times what she thought of the 6 cases brought up that had equivalent sentences. Sylvia avoided totally a simple straight forward question. She can't debate?

It is for the Minister to highlight these cases in his reply. He is in the position to obtain such information from his ministry. We public are in no position to know all cases that is the purpose of Sylvia Lim question.
 
This question is par for the course in parliament seating. But point was (as LTK cut in) there intimidation?
 
she did answer him, by emphasing that woffles wu not only falsifying the document one time, but a few times. so why is the legal system too lenient on the number of offences he committed. i do wonder sometimes that shanmugam tried to dodge her arguments

Nope, she didn't. she avoided his question three times.
 
Back
Top