How will LKY feel?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Shanmugam & Vivian sue Lee Hsien Yang in S'pore High Court for defamation
- Thread starter Ralders
- Start date
Is it necessary? He's in UK. What he did in the UK should stay in the UK.
The Rajas of Rideout will get a phyric victory in Singapore.
In return the Singapore judiciary will have its name dragged through m&d and cause greater resentment against the political masters.
Our status as an independent arbitration and mediation hub will be adversely affected as well, seeing how the courts bend to the will of government.
All just to please the Minister of Law. Selfish bastards. May you live forever.
In return the Singapore judiciary will have its name dragged through m&d and cause greater resentment against the political masters.
Our status as an independent arbitration and mediation hub will be adversely affected as well, seeing how the courts bend to the will of government.
All just to please the Minister of Law. Selfish bastards. May you live forever.
Wow .. this Will Sam chap must be Yang's alter ego.
The alter ego speaks, and a few more will echo him, then Yang will be seen as wise and heeding public advice NOT to challenge and stay away as REMOTE HERO.
So if a Singapore citizen goes to JB for shopping, and then from his JB hotel fires a 81 mortar at Marsiling causing damage. The victim in Singapore cannot sue the Singapore citizen ??
Which law say can not fire 81 mortar?So if a Singapore citizen goes to JB for shopping, and then from his JB hotel fires a 81 mortar at Marsiling causing damage. The victim in Singapore cannot sue the Singapore citizen ??
Will they ask UK to extradite him?
Don't mix up Civil with criminal suit.
Tiagong , no update on this morning
Supreme Court Hearing ... :(
Supreme Court Hearing ... :(
Registrar Chamber, not even a court hearing.
AR is a small fly. He will allow the Plaintiffs to serve the OC overseas.
Oppies will wake up from hallucinations that Ministers can only sue Yang in UK.
Last edited:
why Bro Yang fighting this case
alone. ? :(
i sure many Singaporeans are
very interested in this case
and would like to be kept updated
and help out financially
if need be .
Engage KC, get ready $1m.
Yang is kiam seap.
This is a proxy fight. The two proxies will huntum him jialat jialat because they know his character too well ... 怕事！
PAP can do wonders.
PAP no need to do wonders to kiap Yang's balls.
Just admit you got it wrong lah
Extradite is not a word you can use on civil matters.
Engage KC, get ready $1m.
Yang is kiam seap.
This is a proxy fight. The two proxies will huntum him jialat jialat because they know his character too well ... 怕事！
fully agree.
very kiam seap :(
even can crowd funds also dont want.
dont know what he wants :(
in the meantime
KJ who started it all
remain very quiet and
kena all these attacks
.
If he doesn't want to fight, we can imply that he is kiam seap.
If he goes crowdfund his lawsuit, he PROVES he is kiam seap.
I can understand people like Roy Ngerng and Leong Sze Hian going for crowdfunding. But Yang is so rich
And it's precisely because he is rich, and he still doesn't want fight, it makes him look really kiam seap. Hello ! The wife is not a housewife, ok ? Some big shot corporate lawyer.
They should have a MMA fight then to settle matters.
Papers are calling both Ministers
of Indian-Origin :
.
.
of Indian-Origin :
.
.
.If he doesn't want to fight, we can imply that he is kiam seap.
If he goes crowdfund his lawsuit, he PROVES he is kiam seap.
I can understand people like Roy Ngerng and Leong Sze Hian going for crowdfunding. But Yang is so rich
Just In ,
.
SINGAPORE – Cabinet ministers K. Shanmugam and Vivian Balakrishnan, who are suing Mr Lee Hsien Yang for defamation over his comments relating to their rental of two bungalows in Ridout Road, have applied to serve court papers on him by Facebook Messenger.
In court documents obtained by The Straits Times, lawyers acting for the two ministers made the application on the grounds that it was impractical to serve the court papers on Mr Lee personally in Britain.
The lawyers, from Davinder Singh Chambers, also stated that “substituted service by Facebook Messenger will probably be effective in bringing the court papers to the notice of the defendant”.
Substituted service refers to methods of serving court papers when attempts to serve them in person have been unsuccessful.
Methods of substituted service include the posting of court documents on the front door of the defendant’s premises, sending the documents by registered post or by e-mail, or placing an advertisement in the newspapers.
The ministers are seeking a court order that the papers are deemed to have been served by sending the documents in portable document format, or PDF, by Facebook Messenger to Mr Lee’s profile page on the social networking platform.
Mr Shanmugam, who is Law and Home Affairs Minister, and Dr Balakrishnan, who is Foreign Minister, had filed separate defamation suits in the High Court against Mr Lee on Aug 2.
Mr Lee is the younger son of founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew and brother of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.
The legal action arose over a public post on Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s Facebook page made on July 23.
The post stated, among other things, that “two ministers have leased state-owned mansions from the agency that one of them controls, felling trees and getting state-sponsored renovations”.
Mr Shanmugam and Dr Balakrishnan are seeking damages and an injunction to restrain Mr Lee Hsien Yang from publishing or disseminating the allegations, which they assert are false and defamatory.
They contend that the offending words – which meant that they had been given preferential treatment – are “false and baseless” and “were calculated to disparage and impugn” them.
.
Last edited:
This is bullying
Similar threads
