Serious Shanmugam v. Bloomberg Defamation Case: Bloomberg winning!

[A Singaporean]

Corruption of the highest order. When someone is willing to pay nearly 3 times the value of your house, he expects something in return.

 

[shiokalingam]

 

[jsctan]

Supreme court judges are appointed by the PM. Parliament is dominated by one party way beyond the proportion of the popular vote and that party forms the Executive.

Where is the separaration of powers between the executive, judiciary and legislature?

I think all the PSC churning scholars to become CS, PA, Judiciary system was once independent becomes no longer independent already.

 

[True Believer]

Please do not post fake news. Judges in Sickipoora have been made any rulings. They just read the rulings given to them by PAP.

You need to brush up on your English. I stated that Shanmugam and Tan See Leng are celebrating before the judge has even made his ruling; we all know that no judge in S'pore dares to rule against the PAP, so his ruling is dictated by how the 2 PAP ministers want the judge to rule. Get it now?

 

[WangChuk]

Shanmugam v. Bloomberg Defamation Case confirm Bloomberg lose one lah .... all the employees involved in the Cork are on the papaya paylist .... they dare break their own rice bowl ah?

 

[superpower]

Shanmugam v. Bloomberg Defamation Case confirm Bloomberg lose one lah .... all the employees involved in the Cork are on the papaya paylist .... they dare break their own rice bowl ah?

 

[jsctan]

Shanmugam v. Bloomberg Defamation Case confirm Bloomberg lose one lah .... all the employees involved in the Cork are on the papaya paylist .... they dare break their own rice bowl ah?

Like this kym？

 

[True Believer]

Shanmugam v. Bloomberg Defamation Case confirm Bloomberg lose one lah .... all the employees involved in the Cork are on the papaya paylist .... they dare break their own rice bowl ah?

The S'pore Court will do their "Wallaby Dance".

 

[Papsmearer]

Tiagong buyer's lawyer is A&G, and seller's lawyer also A&G. Different lawyers working in the same law firm.

Buyer's lawyer knows the identity of the UBO but he will not tell seller's lawyer. Very professional one.

Seller lawyer is for sure A & G. How do u know buyer lawyer is also the same? Such a sensitive purchase, I would have expected A & G to recuse themselves.

 

[Papsmearer]

If a person like OBS coming in and he has an account already. No need to go through opening a new account. Just whether UBS did their due diligence and made report.

What kind of due diligence u want UBS to make on OBS? LOL. UBS has to just google him and see his net worth statement, which would be a long list, and know that OBS has 200 ways to assemble $88 million from his various holdings. It's sup sup for a Billionaire. It's not like OBS is a swakoo Tiong from a town in China that no one has heard off.

 

[Papsmearer]

Supreme court judges are appointed by the PM. Parliament is dominated by one party way beyond the proportion of the popular vote and that party forms the Executive.

Where is the separaration of powers between the executive, judiciary and legislature?

Rhetorical question lah. There is no separation. Just look at how many times the govt has lost in court in the last 50 years. LOL. It's a joke. Even Trump govt loses every week in Court hearings.

 

[Papsmearer]

We can be the Switzerland of the East, banking money in Swiss bank very private. Now the bank can also help clients buy landed
property through trustee. 1 level up Swiss.
Got $88M, businessman can do so many things. Why buy a GCB at such a high price? Hoping to wait for appreciation till $100M?
Look at Hao Mart, get bank money to start more business.

This is the bottom line question. The chances of this GCB appreciating to $100 million is very small, almost non. Usually GCB selling for this price have some development potential to high rise condos. But not Shan's GCB. And the fact that Shan would risk all this scrutiny over such a transaction to a secret buyer, means that he knew this price was so above what he could otherwise obtain for his GCB, that he had to risk it. Then the bottomline question is who would overpay so much to him and for what reason?

 

[Papsmearer]

Corruption of the highest order. When someone is willing to pay nearly 3 times the value of your house, he expects something in return.

Bingo, that is the whole point. My bet is OBS

 

[Papsmearer]

I think all the PSC churning scholars to become CS, PA, Judiciary system was once independent becomes no longer independent already.

Independent and separation of power and checks and balances have all been myth since the days of the Old Fart. U look at the system now. The President appoints the Chief Justice of Singapore. And the President makes this appointment based on who the PeeM recommends to the post. Since the President is also ex PAP and special selected by the PeeM/PAP for the post of President, it's the same team that is making the appointment. Chief Justice then appoints the judges, including whoever will try this case. If it's a govt case, AG is also appointed by the PeeM. LOL. Like Lucien was Pinky's personal lawyer. So, u have presiding Judge appointed by CJ, who was appointed by PeeM via Presidente, and the prosecutor for the case also Appointed by PeeM via AG, how can oppo or anyone going against the govt win? LOL.

 

[Dongyi]

Seller lawyer is for sure A & G. How do u know buyer lawyer is also the same? Such a sensitive purchase, I would have expected A & G to recuse themselves.

Under "background to the transaction", lawyer for UBS Trustees = lawyer for buyer.

https://theonlinecitizen.com/2026/0...r-of-his-s-88m-gcb-defamation-hearing-reveals

 

[joemartini]

 

[joemartini]

 

[joemartini]

what is it about UBS Trustees (S) Ltd?

are we talking about UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland)?

 

[joemartini]

https://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-and-Amy-Silk-Palace/100090352489795/

 

[joemartini]

https://forums.fuckwarezone.com.sg/...-and-alleged-retaliatory-deportation.7180480/


Together with my husband, we spent ten years building our business from 2014 to 2023.
Because we refused to cooperate with a Singapore money-laundering syndicate, both my husband and I were allegedly framed by MOM investigators collaborating with the syndicate, and falsely accused of “illegal work.”
We were banned from leaving Singapore for 32 months.
The syndicate destroyed my property and court documents.
After an investigation by 10 police officers, criminal acts were confirmed, but the case was allegedly covered up by Senior Indian Minister Shanmugam, and the investigating officer was transferred.
Under serious business, financial, and personal distress, we defended ourselves without a lawyer and were acquitted.
We then filed a claim in the High Court seeking compensation.
However, after the High Court claim was filed, we were allegedly deported to Beijing by ICA—under Shanmugam’s management—in order to block our lawsuit: HC/OC 276/2023.

Serious allegations by them.