• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

[Sg] - Lao chio cougar celebrity Hazelle Teo, 32, marries her 26 year old boy toy

UltimaOnline

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
28,764
Points
113
1771295167567.png



https://mothership.sg/2026/02/hazelle-teo-james-wong-age-gap/
 
A man is governed less by his heart than by his mind. Before he commits to a relationship, he calculates. He weighs effort against reward, sacrifice against return. Emotion may draw him in, but reason determines whether he stays. Only when the perceived advantages outweigh the costs does he commit himself.

In conventional relationships, an older man with a younger woman is expected to provide — financially, emotionally, and socially. Such a role demands responsibility, discipline, and sustained effort. It requires a willingness to shoulder burdens and to sacrifice comfort. For a man of character, this expectation may be embraced. For a man inclined toward ease, it is a deterrent.

This is where the appeal of an older woman emerges for certain younger men. An older, financially independent woman relieves him of traditional pressures. The social expectation to provide weakens; the burden of leadership lightens. If she initiates the relationship, he is further spared the risk of rejection — a powerful incentive for a man with a fragile ego. In such an arrangement, he may perceive his youth as his primary contribution and justify receiving more than he gives.

Thus, the preference is not fundamentally about attraction but about advantage. A younger man who lacks confidence, discipline, or ambition may gravitate toward an older woman not out of admiration, but out of convenience. Where responsibility is heavy, he retreats; where comfort is offered, he advances.

In this sense, the dynamics of such relationships reveal less about romance and more about character.​

@Tragedeigh KYM ? :rolleyes:
 
A man is governed less by his heart than by his mind. Before he commits to a relationship, he calculates. He weighs effort against reward, sacrifice against return. Emotion may draw him in, but reason determines whether he stays. Only when the perceived advantages outweigh the costs does he commit himself.

In conventional relationships, an older man with a younger woman is expected to provide — financially, emotionally, and socially. Such a role demands responsibility, discipline, and sustained effort. It requires a willingness to shoulder burdens and to sacrifice comfort. For a man of character, this expectation may be embraced. For a man inclined toward ease, it is a deterrent.

This is where the appeal of an older woman emerges for certain younger men. An older, financially independent woman relieves him of traditional pressures. The social expectation to provide weakens; the burden of leadership lightens. If she initiates the relationship, he is further spared the risk of rejection — a powerful incentive for a man with a fragile ego. In such an arrangement, he may perceive his youth as his primary contribution and justify receiving more than he gives.

Thus, the preference is not fundamentally about attraction but about advantage. A younger man who lacks confidence, discipline, or ambition may gravitate toward an older woman not out of admiration, but out of convenience. Where responsibility is heavy, he retreats; where comfort is offered, he advances.

In this sense, the dynamics of such relationships reveal less about romance and more about character.​

@Tragedeigh KYM ? :rolleyes:
You are 李白 today on 大年初一,everything you say also is 可以 :laugh:
 
A man is governed less by his heart than by his mind. Before he commits to a relationship, he calculates. He weighs effort against reward, sacrifice against return. Emotion may draw him in, but reason determines whether he stays. Only when the perceived advantages outweigh the costs does he commit himself.

In conventional relationships, an older man with a younger woman is expected to provide — financially, emotionally, and socially. Such a role demands responsibility, discipline, and sustained effort. It requires a willingness to shoulder burdens and to sacrifice comfort. For a man of character, this expectation may be embraced. For a man inclined toward ease, it is a deterrent.

This is where the appeal of an older woman emerges for certain younger men. An older, financially independent woman relieves him of traditional pressures. The social expectation to provide weakens; the burden of leadership lightens. If she initiates the relationship, he is further spared the risk of rejection — a powerful incentive for a man with a fragile ego. In such an arrangement, he may perceive his youth as his primary contribution and justify receiving more than he gives.

Thus, the preference is not fundamentally about attraction but about advantage. A younger man who lacks confidence, discipline, or ambition may gravitate toward an older woman not out of admiration, but out of convenience. Where responsibility is heavy, he retreats; where comfort is offered, he advances.

In this sense, the dynamics of such relationships reveal less about romance and more about character.​

This sounds like text generated by AI. Good luck to the people who seek life advice from AI or debate philosophy/spirituality topics with AI. Eventually you will not know what it means to be a human. :cool:
 
This sounds like text generated by AI. Good luck to the people who seek life advice from AI or debate philosophy/spirituality topics with AI. Eventually you will not know what it means to be a human. :cool:

Love AI! :D

Here are several ready-to-use chunks of premium-grade corporate doublespeak for SammyBoy Inc. Feel free to copy-paste them into earnings calls, press releases, investor decks, or LinkedIn thought-leadership posts:

1.
“At SammyBoy Inc., we remain steadfastly committed to relentlessly driving best-in-class, next-generation value creation across our entire ecosystem by leveraging our unique, purpose-driven synergies and proprietary paradigm-shifting frameworks that position us at the absolute forefront of transformative industry leadership.”

2.
“SammyBoy Inc. continues to execute with unwavering excellence on our clearly articulated strategic imperatives, delivering unmatched operational agility while optimizing holistic stakeholder outcomes through continuous, data-informed evolution of our differentiated core competencies.”

3.
“We are proud to reaffirm that SammyBoy Inc. maintains its industry-leading posture by proactively aligning cutting-edge innovation pipelines with best-practice scalability vectors, thereby ensuring sustained, above-market momentum in an increasingly dynamic competitive landscape.”

4.
“Through the disciplined application of our world-class talent density and our proprietary acceleration methodology, SammyBoy Inc. consistently outperforms peer benchmarks while simultaneously redefining the boundaries of what’s possible in customer-centric excellence and future-proof enterprise resilience.”

5.
“SammyBoy Inc. proudly operates at the intersection of uncompromising quality and relentless forward velocity, harnessing our distinctive end-to-end ecosystem orchestration capabilities to generate superior, long-duration enterprise value for all constituents in every market vertical we touch.”

6.
“Our unwavering focus on agile, insight-led transformation enables SammyBoy Inc. to maintain pole position in the delivery of high-impact, outcome-oriented solutions that continuously raise the bar for category-defining performance and stakeholder-aligned growth trajectories.”

Bonus extra-pompous version (perfect for the chairman’s letter):

“As we look toward the horizon, SammyBoy Inc. stands unequivocally as the preeminent architect of tomorrow’s possibilities—continuously reimagining the art of the possible through our singular fusion of visionary stewardship, operational mastery, and unrelenting pursuit of category transcendence.”

All of these statements are 100% content-free while sounding extremely confident and expensive. Use liberally.
 
A man is governed less by his heart than by his mind. Before he commits to a relationship, he calculates. He weighs effort against reward, sacrifice against return. Emotion may draw him in, but reason determines whether he stays. Only when the perceived advantages outweigh the costs does he commit himself.

In conventional relationships, an older man with a younger woman is expected to provide — financially, emotionally, and socially. Such a role demands responsibility, discipline, and sustained effort. It requires a willingness to shoulder burdens and to sacrifice comfort. For a man of character, this expectation may be embraced. For a man inclined toward ease, it is a deterrent.

This is where the appeal of an older woman emerges for certain younger men. An older, financially independent woman relieves him of traditional pressures. The social expectation to provide weakens; the burden of leadership lightens. If she initiates the relationship, he is further spared the risk of rejection — a powerful incentive for a man with a fragile ego. In such an arrangement, he may perceive his youth as his primary contribution and justify receiving more than he gives.

Thus, the preference is not fundamentally about attraction but about advantage. A younger man who lacks confidence, discipline, or ambition may gravitate toward an older woman not out of admiration, but out of convenience. Where responsibility is heavy, he retreats; where comfort is offered, he advances.

In this sense, the dynamics of such relationships reveal less about romance and more about character.​

@Tragedeigh KYM ? :rolleyes:
No need to overthink please. If they are happy, it is good.
 
Back
Top