• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sex Perv coming to a clinic near you!

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's pretty rich to say that they sought out "vulnerable patients".

Those women were willing participants. One of them only revolted because she found that she had become the butt of WhatsApp jokes, and could not tolerate the violation of her dignity. The violation of her pussy was never an issue prior to that.

You are right. The woman is a willing subject. But when she is a butt of jokes, her dignity got violated in a very different way.
Violating her pussy is all right, she enjoys it.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Doctors accused of having sex with patients have agreed not to contact female patients outside of work: SMC
Dr Chan Herng Nieng (left) and Dr Julian Ong Kian Peng.

Dr Chan Herng Nieng (left) and Dr Julian Ong Kian Peng.PHOTOS: ST FILE
PUBLISHED
APR 22, 2020, 4:21 PM SGT
FACEBOOKTWITTER

Salma Khalik
Senior Health Correspondent

SINGAPORE - The Singapore Medical Council (SMC) said it has asked the two doctors accused of taking advantage of vulnerable patients for sex to refrain from contacting their female patients outside of work.

A woman had complained to the SMC, the medical watchdog, in June 2018 that Dr Chan Herng Nieng, a psychiatrist, and Dr Julian Ong, a surgeon, had taken advantage of vulnerable female patients and colleagues "to satisfy their immoral desires".

Dr Ong sued the woman for defamation but lost his case on April 3. The district court judge said the woman's statements were justified and awarded her costs.
In a statement on Wednesday (April 22), the SMC said: "When the judgment from the defamation suit was brought to the SMC's attention in April 2020, the SMC had acted immediately to secure signed undertakings from both Dr Chan and Dr Ong to refrain from contacting female patients for purposes outside the scope of their medical practice, pending the completion of the disciplinary process against them."

It is not stated when the SMC took this action.
On Monday, Parkway withdrew Dr Ong's accreditation, so he can no longer use the group's four hospitals - Gleneagles, Mount Elizabeth, Mount Elizabeth Novena and Parkway East - and facilities for his patients, pending the outcome of the complaint.


An article in this paper had mentioned that the SMC had seven sex-related complaints against doctors in 2018, of which four had been carried over from 2017. Only one had been dealt with in 2018 while the other six were carried over to 2019.

The SMC said: "Of the seven cases pertaining to sexual offences mentioned in the ST article, three have been concluded and four are ongoing. In the four that are ongoing, the SMC has taken precautionary measures to protect the patients."
It explained that it "has a standing policy to put in place safeguards to protect patients of doctors being investigated for sexual offences", as the "protection of patients is SMC's utmost priority".
Related Story
Surgeon loses defamation suit as judge upholds woman's claim that he took advantage of vulnerable patients
Related Story
Parkway Group suspends accreditation of doctor who lost defamation suit
Related Story
Doctors sharing patient information for sex: Disciplinary watchdog must do better
It added that its Complaints Committee is already investigating the complaint made against both Dr Chan and Dr Ong.
It also said it "continues to work closely with the Ministry of Health (MOH) and medical professional bodies to implement the recommendations made by the MOH Workgroup to improve its disciplinary processes and to minimise delays in dealing with complaints".
 

melzp

Alfrescian
Loyal
SMC is behaving like NUS/NTU in those toilets' video peep.

Furthermore, SMC do not make it compulsory for Drs' names to be
displayed at clinic front; be it FT or PT. I protested that public hv the
right whom they are consulting.
 

porcaputtana

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's just normal behavior for this group of people.
SMC is behaving like NUS/NTU in those toilets' video peep.

Furthermore, SMC do not make it compulsory for Drs' names to be
displayed at clinic front; be it FT or PT. I protested that public hv the
right whom they are consulting.
Julian Ong supposed to disclose to all patients that he is a certified sex pervert.

That should be prominently displayed in neon lights outside every HC Surgical Clinic and in bold on his business card.

MBBS, FRCS, M.Med, Board Certified Sex Pervert
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
It is bad taste for a doctor to have sex with a patient. Doctors should fuck nurses and lawyers should fuck paralegals. Never fuck your customers: rule number 1 of business.
 
Top