• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

S Pass workers may face tightening measures: Tan Chuan-Jin

Newasia

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE: Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin said there will be no U-turn on the tightening of foreign worker inflow into Singapore.

He hinted that foreign workers in the S Pass category may face further tightening measures as early as the first quarter of 2013.

S Pass holders are mid-level workers earning at least S$2,000 a month.

Statistics from the Manpower Ministry showed that the number of S Pass holders rose from nearly 114,000 last year to about 128,000, as of June this year.

For the first half of this year, the number of Employment Pass holders dipped from 175,400 to 174,700.

Mr Tan said it is likely that companies are using S Passes to bring in more junior-level professionals, managers and executives (PMEs).

He said: "I've mentioned before the S Pass is a sector we are not totally comfortable with, because there's a lot of transference of Employment Passes into S Passes and we are now exploring measures to perhaps tighten that segment."

Speaking at the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) convention on Thursday, Mr Tan explained the government is neither trying to close the tap completely nor reducing the current numbers.

"The tap was turned on and running in the past, at a fairly fast-flowing rate," said Mr Tan.

"The tap continues to run, but what we've done is to actually turn the tap to move at a much slower pace that we think is sustainable."

The government has always been moderating the increases to a sustainable rate, one that enables businesses to grow, he said.

Mr Tan said his ministry will continue to listen to feedback from businesses and exercise flexibility where possible, as long as it does not compromise Singapore's long term objectives.

He also assured businesses the government will manage the pace of manpower tightening carefully.

Mr Tan noted that if tightening is too aggressive, many businesses will fold and if it is too slow, the economy will lose the momentum for change, so a careful balance is needed.

To moderate the impact on companies, the government makes incremental changes and announce these changes early and provide time for companies to adjust.

Mr Tan also explained why the government tightened foreign worker supply.

He said Singapore cannot continue to rely on low-cost foreign labour to grow the economy.

The price advantage that companies offer cannot be based just on lower cost, as Singapore cannot out-compete its neighbours, who will always have more ready access to low-cost labour.

Mr Tan also said over-reliance on low-cost labour imposes hidden costs on the economy and on the society.

It reduces motivation to innovate, raise productivity and move up the value chain.

Mr Chan Chong Beng, the president of Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (ASME) said: "If (companies) want to survive, these are the realities they have to face. Asking for more workers is out of date."

He added: "So I think SMEs should give up that idea and look forward to the next level of support that the government can give and look very carefully again to productivity because this is the only way for them to survive in time to come."

Mr Tan said the government will continue to support SMEs to grow by being more productive.

Early findings from a recent study commissioned by the National Productivity and Continuing Education Council (NPCEC) involving 263 SMEs showed many know what kind of support is available.

While more than nine on 10 SMEs polled were aware of the government productivity drive, only slightly more than one in 10 said they eventually benefit the schemes.

Some of the reasons cited include having to deal with a tedious application process.

Mr Tan said over the next few months, the government will look at how to administer such schemes better.

Mr Chan said productivity schemes should be made simpler to understand and wanted to see more government support.

"Most of the SMEs do not have cash to go into a grant and many a time they have to fork out the money," said Mr Chan.

"So, the government should also look into areas in which how the SMEs can be helped financially to kick start any grants that they have."

- CNA/ck/xq
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Mr Chan Chong Beng, the president of Association of Small and Medium Enterprises (ASME) said: "If (companies) want to survive, these are the realities they have to face. Asking for more workers is out of date."

I am shocked he actually said that. He adopted a very reconciliatory tone.

Sounds good though. Wonder if there is more than meets the eye.
 
Last edited:

watchman8

Alfrescian
Loyal
what a joke. The same was said last year and earlier this year. Yet the total net immigration inflow continues unabated.

VOTE TAN CHUAN JIN OUT !!!
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
128,000 S-pass holders earning at least $2,000.00 pm ??? !!! PAP cockroaches Suddenly wake up from slumber.Now u wonder,128,000 jobs of Singapore Citizens replaced by Foreigners ??? U mean these type of jobs Singaporeans cannot do ? too stupid to do ? KNNCCB to the PAP !!! KNNCCB to the NTUC !!! KNNCCB to the 60 %!! KNNCCB to the Singapore Employers !!!
 

ginfreely

Alfrescian
Loyal
.......................

Mr Tan noted that if tightening is too aggressive, many businesses will fold and if it is too slow, the economy will lose the momentum for change, so a careful balance is needed.

........................

Mr Tan also said over-reliance on low-cost labour imposes hidden costs on the economy and on the society.

It reduces motivation to innovate, raise productivity and move up the value chain.

If business need to rely on low cost labour to survive, they should fold up. Now then say, takes them so long to realise abundant availability of low cost labour reduce the employers' motivation to innovate and raise productivity.
 

Kinana

Alfrescian
Loyal
Not a good idea at all from PAP.
Investments will dry up and inflation will soar as a result of such a cut back.
 

akunei

Alfrescian
Loyal
128,000 S-pass holders earning at least $2,000.00 pm ??? !!! PAP cockroaches Suddenly wake up from slumber.Now u wonder,128,000 jobs of Singapore Citizens replaced by Foreigners ??? U mean these type of jobs Singaporeans cannot do ? too stupid to do ? KNNCCB to the PAP !!! KNNCCB to the NTUC !!! KNNCCB to the 60 %!! KNNCCB to the Singapore Employers !!!

KNNCCB to batman1!
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
All S-Pass should be cancelled immediately. Only foreigners making a minimum of $15k basic per month be allowed in. That will reduced foreigners in the country by 90 percent. The PAP won't do it because foreigners boost their income.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
You got to fine tune your foreign worker policy. Don't have a blanket quota for each sector. Each and every industry must be fine tune

Other is to stop PMET take away job for local.
 

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Reducing the tap by 0.00001% is still a reduction and can be used to trumpet that we actually are reducing the flow.

Only idiots deserve this kind of govt.
 

Valdez

Alfrescian
Loyal
All S-Pass should be cancelled immediately. Only foreigners making a minimum of $15k basic per month be allowed in. That will reduced foreigners in the country by 90 percent. The PAP won't do it because foreigners boost their income.

Wah don t be too happy. Many companies will pack up and leave Singapore maybe forever. Singaporeans will be jobless as there will be fewer companies may be left with GLCs. Less people means less incentives to build more shops and malls, restaurants etc.... Growth will be affected. Investors lack the confidence to invest here. Singapore not like other countries like Malaysia or Thailand with big population and natural resources and land. There will be less taxes for Singapore to collect. Less subsidies for housing,health, transport... Just look at Japan. It's become a nation of retirees as the young and able move abroad as very little employment opportunities there.

The biggest beneficiaries are Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar maybe even Philippines. They must be laughing and waiting for Singapore companies to move there and provide employment for their citizens. No need for them to become hated FTs in Singapore when jobs are being in their own countries.

Bad bad news for Singapore.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wah don t be too happy. Many companies will pack up and leave Singapore maybe forever. Singaporeans will be jobless as there will be fewer companies may be left with GLCs. Less people means less incentives to build more shops and malls, restaurants etc.... Growth will be affected. Investors lack the confidence to invest here. Singapore not like other countries like Malaysia or Thailand with big population and natural resources and land. There will be less taxes for Singapore to collect. Less subsidies for housing,health, transport... Just look at Japan. It's become a nation of retirees as the young and able move abroad as very little employment opportunities there.

The biggest beneficiaries are Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar maybe even Philippines. They must be laughing and waiting for Singapore companies to move there and provide employment for their citizens. No need for them to become hated FTs in Singapore when jobs are being in their own countries.

Bad bad news for Singapore.

You still believe in the PAP crap? In the past, the PAP said sinkapore needs foreign expertise. So, we took a good in a good number of expats. Then, they changed their story. Sinkapore needs cheap labour for construction and factories. Latest bs is that Sinkapore needs foreigns PMET. If we need all these foreigners, why are there so many jobless sinkee PMET?

What's the point of having growth when thousands of well-educated sinkees are impoverished? With so many foreigners around, that's why inflation is 5 percent! At this rate, sinkees will soon only be able to afford tofu and kiam chye for meals!

I wasn't aware there are subsidies for housing, health, transport ...if these subsidies exist, it must be based on the PAP's definition of subsidy which is an inflation of many times the actual cost and then tell you that you have to pay the actual cost plus a profit margin. That's why 'subsidized' HDB flats cost $500k, hospital stays cost ten of thousands dollars. Only brain-dead sinkees buy the PAP's definition of subsidy.

Sinkapore is supposed to be a developed country, yet we are competing against Malaysia, Thailand etc. The government has not delivered on the economy if we can't grow without using cheap foreign labour. We voted for a government that serves the people, not one that generates incomes for foreigners.

Take the bullet which would be short term pain and move up the value chain. The current model is not working and will only put sinkees in dire straits.
 

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Mr Tan noted that if tightening is too aggressive, many businesses will fold and if it is too slow, the economy will lose the momentum for change, so a careful balance is needed.

This is the usual BS they try to feed us whenever this issue comes up. Is folding up a really bad option? PAP delibrately raised salaries and CPF rates at one time to indirectly force smaller non-mechanised companies to the nearby neighbouts, saying that we want to rise up the food chain. You believe that many of these SMEs will move to Malaysia (uncertain politics), Indonesia (look at the almost uncontrollable workforce there), Thailand (with the language and nationalistic issues)?

If these SMEs who have been fed the opium of cheap labour in recent years have not thought about expanding, what will make them expand or move now?
 
Top