• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

S$6.5m Insurance Scam : AIA's Former high-flying Agent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yip Hon
  • Start date Start date
Y

Yip Hon

Guest
>

http://sg.yfittopostblog.com/2010/10/10/clients-need-to-be-mindful-say-insurance-agents/

>


Know what you’re signing: insurance agents



By Ion Danker – October 10th, 2010



Insurance agents Yahoo! Singapore spoke to say that the latest multi-million dollar insurance scam involving an agent selling a non-existent insurance policy will negatively impact the image of agents.

But they also said a useful lesson can be learnt from the case — that clients need to be more mindful of what they are being sold and how to make payment.

In an ongoing high-profile case, a former high-flying agent from American International Assurance (AIA) is being sued by a semi-retired Indonesian businessman for selling him a fake insurance policy that cost a staggering S$6.5 million.

Mohd. Shaiful, 35, who has been in the industry for over five years, said the latest case will affect the image of agents.

“It will have a ripple effect and a lot of us will be affected by this bad publicity,” he said, before offering his take on the case.

“Clients need to be wary as to what they are getting into and in any circumstances where you want to take premiums which involves cash, always insist for an official receipt, and when making payment, never pay in cash or cash cheque. The cheque should have the name of the company on it.”

“When paying premiums of a certain amount, have your agent produce a letter of undertaking and if unsure, call the company to enquire for more details,” he added.

Another agent, John Peh, agreed and said “there will be repercussions felt by agents in the industry due to this incident.”

“If you’re uncomfortable before signing the documents, just say ‘no’ and call the company to find out more details,” he said.

Andy Chua, who has been in the industry for over 10 years, said that the latest incident will definitely create some fears among retail investors and insurance policy holders.

He added that he is confident measures are in place to look into the matter. “There is no need to be over concerned because since the Lehman Brothers issue, MAS have stepped up compliance within the FA industry but clients must still exercise some precautions when investing huge amounts.”

In the case reported by The Sunday Times, businessman Mr Ong Han Ling, 72, is taking his agent, Ms Sally Low Ai Ming, to court and is claiming about $3.6 million plus loss of use of his funds.

The $3.6 million is the amount left outstanding after the agent made restitution for some of the policy premiums. The police and insurance giant AIA are investigating claims.

But according to the paper, the 33-year-old Ms Low – who was sacked by AIA in September last year — is contesting his claims.

She claims that the fake insurance plan called the “AIA Thank You Policy” she sold him was part of an elaborate ploy conceived by Mr Ong to defraud AIA.

Ms Low – who was a former protege of AIA’s top-producing agent and ex-Taiwanese actress Mary Chen — claims she was merely an accomplice.

Mr Ong revealed in his suit that Ms Low became a trusted friend of his family after he and his wife Enny Ariandini Pramana, 71, started buying several policies from her in 2000.

In 2002, Ms Low reportedly told Mr Ong about a policy — called the “AIA Thank You Policy” — that was offered only to high net-worth clients, which required a single premium payment of about US$5 million.

The policyholder, in return, would receive annual fixed returns of 6 to 7 per cent, payable upon maturity of the policy in five years. This worked out to maturity sums of US$4.95 million plus $4.5 million.

Mr Ong said that he only found out from AIA that the policy did not exist after receiving a call from the company’s Singapore office when the maturity payouts were due in January 2008.

He claims that Ms Low had instead used the premium payment of US$5.06 million to buy four AIA policies under his name, his wife’s and their daughter’s names without their knowledge.

But in her defence, Ms Low alleged that it was Mr Ong who planned for them to defraud AIA and share half the gains when she approached him to buy more policies in 2002.

She said that the ploy was for her to sell the non-existent policy to Mr Ong and once this was exposed, AIA would be held responsible for Ms Low’s misdeed and would be obliged to compensate him for his losses – possibly honouring the maturity sums promised.

She also claims that by mid-2005, she regretted being part of the plan to cheat AIA and instead asked Mr Ong to give her a free hand in carrying out the investments with the money she received from him until 2007 in order to achieve returns that would match the amount he wanted to get from the plan to defraud AIA.

However, she was unable to do so due to the market downturn.

Ms Low alleges that as she did not fraudulently sell Mr Ong the “AIA Thank You policy”, she is not liable to pay or reimburse anything to him.

The latest insurance scandal has shocked industry watchers.

President of the Singapore Insurance Institute, Mr Stanley Jeremiah, told The Sunday Times he has never heard of an agent selling a non-existent product.

He said, “I’ve heard of agents who pocketed the premiums before disappearing or buying some other policy that the client didn’t agree to.”

When contacted, AIA told the same paper: “We are currently conducting an investigation into the matter, including the allegations as outlined in the court papers by our policyholder and the defence raised by our former agent.”

It said it could not provide more details because legal proceedings are under way.



>
 
>

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_588900.html

>


Oct 10, 2010


S$6.5m insurance scam

'First of its kind' case spins web of deceit that includes fake policy and forged signatures


By Lorna Tan, Senior Correspondent



Police and insurance giant AIA are investigating claims by a businessman that his insurance agent sold him a non-existent insurance policy that cost a whopping S$6.5 million. -- ST PHOTO: AIDAH RAUF




THE police and insurance giant AIA are investigating claims by a semi-retired Indonesian businessman that his insurance agent sold him a non-existent insurance policy that cost a whopping US$5 million (S$6.5 million).

The sensational case, which industry experts say is the first of its kind in Singapore, is currently before the courts.

The businessman, Mr Ong Han Ling, 72, is suing the agent, Ms Sally Low Ai Ming, for about $3.6 million plus loss of use of his funds. The $3.6 million is the amount left outstanding after the agent made restitution for some of the policy premiums.

In her defence, 33-year-old Ms Low, who was sacked by AIA in September last year, has alleged that the fake insurance plan - called the 'AIA Thank You Policy' - was part of an elaborate ploy conceived by Mr Ong to defraud AIA. She claimed she was merely an accomplice.

The Sunday Times obtained legal documents filed by both parties and they revealed intriguing claims that included a fake policy schedule and forged letters from AIA officials such as Mr Mark O'Dell, then the insurer's general manager in Singapore


In his suit, Mr Ong said that the trouble began when he and his wife Enny Ariandini Pramana, 71, bought several policies from Ms Low, from 2000. Over time, Ms Low became a trusted friend to the Ong family and visited their home in Scotts Road regularly, he added.


Unique circumstances


Mr Stanley Jeremiah, president of the Singapore Insurance Institute, said that he has never heard of an agent selling a non-existent product.

'I've heard of agents who pocketed the premiums before disappearing or buying some other policy that the client didn't agree to.'



>
 
hi bro avendi , would appreciate very much your


analysis of the food chain in this scam here ...


many thank you
 
>

http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/sub/news/story/0,4574,407798,00.html?

>

Business Times - 11 Oct 2010


AIA Group IPO gets strong early demand




Fund managers attribute this to attractive pricing of the mega offer

(HONG KONG) American International Group Inc has received strong demand for the mega IPO of its Asian life insurance business, AIA Group Ltd, with the offer covered more than five times in the first week, sources with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

AIG is aiming to raise up to US$20.5 billion, including a rare upsize option, by listing AIA on the Hong Kong stock exchange, according to a term sheet obtained by Reuters earlier last week.

The offer was launched on Tuesday and the strong early demand is attributed to attractive pricing, with some fund managers describing the valuation as appealing.

AIG revived the IPO following the collapse of Prudential plc's takeover of AIA, after the British insurer cut its offer price to US$30.4 billion bowing to shareholder's demand, However, the IPO values the company at little more than Pru's final offer, despite rising stock markets.

AIA, a pan-Asian life insurer, has 23 million in-force policies and an embedded value of US$22 billion at the end of May 2010. It operates in 15 Asian markets and is forecast to earn a pre-tax operating profit of not less than US$2 billion for fiscal year ending November 2010.

Embedded value is a measure commonly used to gauge the value of insurance companies and includes the present value of future profit from long-term insurance contracts.

Sources also said that AIG is highly likely to exercise the upsize option given the robust demand for the offer. The sources were not authorised to speak to media about the IPO.

An AIA spokeswoman declined to comment.

However, final decision on whether to exercise the upsize option will be based on the final demand and the price. Bankers have previously told Reuters that AIG is keen to sell as big a stake as possible in the IPO.

The bailed out insurer is required to maintain at least a 30 per cent stake in AIA for one year of the listing and, if the upsize option was taken in full, AIG would be left with a 32.9 per cent stake following the IPO.

The offer is expected to be priced on Oct 21/22 and the shares would start trading on Oct 29.

Unlike many other foreign insurers, AIA has 100 per cent ownership of its entities in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.

AIA is set to be the biggest ever life insurance IPO and the second-biggest global IPO in 2010, if it successfully raises the targeted amount.

AIG is raising funds to pay back some of the financial aid it received from the US government during the financial crisis.

AIG is offering 5.9 billion shares in an indicative range of HK$18.38-19.68 each, to raise up to US$14.9 billion under the basic offer, the term sheet showed.

At the offering price range, AIA is valued at 1.2 to 1.3 times 2010 basis embedded value estimated by bookrunners, according to the term sheet.

By comparison, China Life Insurance Co Ltd, China's No 1 life insurer, traded at 2.4 times forecast 2010 embedded value, while No 2 life insurer Ping An Insurance (Group) Co of China Ltd traded at 2.6 times forecast 2010 embedded value, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report. -- Reuters



Copyright © 2010 Singapore



>
 
.

October 4, 2010, 5.55 am (Singapore time)



AIG cut AIA IPO value to court investors
NEW YORK - AIG has lowered its valuation for the planned initial public offering of its Asian life insurance business, AIA, to secure a US$1 billion commitment from the Kuwait Investment Authority and other cornerstone investors, the Financial Times reported on Sunday.


American International Group had initially aimed to sell shares in AIA at a level that would value the company at US$35 billion to US$37 billion, but cut the valuation in order to get Kuwait's sovereign wealth fund on board, the newspaper said, citing people familiar with the matter.

The sovereign wealth fund signed up to the IPO on the basis that AIA would be valued between US$30 billion and US$32 billion, according to the report.

Other big investors, including a number of Hong Kong tycoons, have also signed up for cornerstone stakes, the report said. In exchange for getting a fixed amount of the offering, the cornerstone investors will be subject to a six-month lock-up on their shares.

Khazanah, the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund, will also take a small stake.

Sources with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters last month that AIG had secured approval from the Hong Kong stock exchange for the IPO. AIA's management team was in advanced talks with several Middle Eastern and Asian sovereign funds to sell cornerstone stakes in AIA, sources told Reuters previously. -- REUTERS
 
.

Business Times - 11 Oct 2010


AIA Group IPO gets strong early demand





Fund managers attribute this to attractive pricing of the mega offer

(HONG KONG) American International Group Inc has received strong demand for the mega IPO of its Asian life insurance business, AIA Group Ltd, with the offer covered more than five times in the first week, sources with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

AIG is aiming to raise up to US$20.5 billion, including a rare upsize option, by listing AIA on the Hong Kong stock exchange, according to a term sheet obtained by Reuters earlier last week.

The offer was launched on Tuesday and the strong early demand is attributed to attractive pricing, with some fund managers describing the valuation as appealing.

AIG revived the IPO following the collapse of Prudential plc's takeover of AIA, after the British insurer cut its offer price to US$30.4 billion bowing to shareholder's demand, However, the IPO values the company at little more than Pru's final offer, despite rising stock markets.

AIA, a pan-Asian life insurer, has 23 million in-force policies and an embedded value of US$22 billion at the end of May 2010. It operates in 15 Asian markets and is forecast to earn a pre-tax operating profit of not less than US$2 billion for fiscal year ending November 2010.

Embedded value is a measure commonly used to gauge the value of insurance companies and includes the present value of future profit from long-term insurance contracts.

Sources also said that AIG is highly likely to exercise the upsize option given the robust demand for the offer. The sources were not authorised to speak to media about the IPO.

An AIA spokeswoman declined to comment.

However, final decision on whether to exercise the upsize option will be based on the final demand and the price. Bankers have previously told Reuters that AIG is keen to sell as big a stake as possible in the IPO.

The bailed out insurer is required to maintain at least a 30 per cent stake in AIA for one year of the listing and, if the upsize option was taken in full, AIG would be left with a 32.9 per cent stake following the IPO.

The offer is expected to be priced on Oct 21/22 and the shares would start trading on Oct 29.

Unlike many other foreign insurers, AIA has 100 per cent ownership of its entities in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam.

AIA is set to be the biggest ever life insurance IPO and the second-biggest global IPO in 2010, if it successfully raises the targeted amount.

AIG is raising funds to pay back some of the financial aid it received from the US government during the financial crisis.

AIG is offering 5.9 billion shares in an indicative range of HK$18.38-19.68 each, to raise up to US$14.9 billion under the basic offer, the term sheet showed.

At the offering price range, AIA is valued at 1.2 to 1.3 times 2010 basis embedded value estimated by bookrunners, according to the term sheet.

By comparison, China Life Insurance Co Ltd, China's No 1 life insurer, traded at 2.4 times forecast 2010 embedded value, while No 2 life insurer Ping An Insurance (Group) Co of China Ltd traded at 2.6 times forecast 2010 embedded value, according to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report. -- Reuters



Copyright © 2010 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. All rights reserved.


.
 
what is brother stanley trying to say :confused:



>

Unique circumstances

Mr Stanley Jeremiah, president of the Singapore Insurance Institute, said that he has never heard of an agent selling a non-existent product.

'I've heard of agents who pocketed the premiums before disappearing or buying some other policy that the client didn't agree to.'



>
 
The Name by itself tells you that the company is Unreliable - AmericanI A.
Great Eastern Sound better.
 
Back
Top