Ah Neh out of cash to arm race with Ah Tiong lah.
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-03-23/doc-ifysnevk9141432.shtml
印度被劝应放下面子顺应中国崛起大势 搞好对华关系
印度被劝应放下面子顺应中国崛起大势 搞好对华关系
0
来源：环球网
原标题：印应放下面子顺应中国崛起大势与我搞好关系
楚柳：印度朝野对华大辩论氛围积极
（作者是中印问题研究学者）
近日，一场中印关系史上少见的对华政策大辩论正在印度全面展开。此次大辩论参与面广，政界、军界、商界以及媒体、智库等朝野人士均不同程度卷入；议题丰富，既有战略和政治安全层面的讨论，亦有对经贸、人文等领域交流合作的期许；重点突出，通过回顾与前瞻中印关系发展，就如何看中国、如何看印度、如何看两国关系未来走向进行再思考。
涉华舆论：两种积极论调
此次大辩论中，涉华积极平衡、客观理性的声音有所增多。以下两种论调值得重视：
一是机遇论。主张视中国发展为机遇，积极支持双边关系改善。印知名学者库尔卡尼等认为，中国发展经验对印有重要借鉴意义，为包括印在内的周边国家带来巨大机遇。印是亚投行第二大出资国和最大资金使用国，用好亚投行资金，参与“一带一路”倡议，有助于印改善自身基础设施和地区互联互通建设。印中同为金砖国家和上合成员国，在全球化、自由贸易、气变等问题上共同利益增多。十九大和两会召开后，中国在习主席领导下保持政策延续性，有利于实现“两个百年”长远奋斗目标，也为中印关系发展增加了确定性。中印关系改善将为印发展创造更多有利内外条件，印中应携手共创“亚洲世纪”。
二是平衡论。认为印对华认知应更加客观平衡，既要合作又要防范。《印度教徒报》等媒体评论称，当前中国地区和国际影响力快速增长，与中国对抗既不利于印自身发展，也将使印东西两线受压，不符合印利益。美并非可靠合作伙伴，印也不能把鸡蛋放在一个篮子里。印需同包括中国在内的大国开展合作，并在不同地区机制间寻求平衡。同时，中国实力增长使印周边外交压力倍增，印应增强自身国防和经济实力，重点拓展海上安全合作，坚决维护国家安全和利益。
中印关系：三大积极变化
本轮印对华政策大辩论之所以出现更多客观理性声音，与当前中印关系总体积极向好、回暖升温的大背景有关，也反映出中印关系三大变化：
一是战略态势之变。
当前印中实力差距不断扩大，中国GDP总额是印的5倍多。印媒自己也感叹中国GDP增长6.5%，相当于印GDP增长40%。印短期内赶超中国无望，自身实力与影响力均难与中国比肩。中国外交战略更加主动进取，积极引领全球化方向，推动周边区域合作与和平发展，彰显大国风范，亦使印相形见绌。
尽管不少声音视中国发展与战略进取为挑战，但更多有识之士认为印应顺应世界发展和中国崛起大势，重视审视并调整对华政策，“放下面子”与中国搞好关系，以合作取代对抗。印中是搬不走的邻居，印不能放弃发展对华关系带来的机遇，更无法承受与华对抗所需付出的代价。
二是政府导向之变。去年9月中印领导人厦门会晤为两国关系发展作出重要战略引领，此后两国政府均致力于积极引导中印关系翻旧页、开新篇。莫迪政府希稳定中印关系，提升印大国地位。近期印政府持续释放发展对华关系积极信号：官方人士不断透露印总理、外长、防长等访华消息；发布禁止官员参与达赖集团活动指令，促其改变所谓纪念活动地点，对涉藏政策纠偏；要求隶属国防部的防务与分析研究所推迟召开“全球视角下的印中关系”研讨会，避免以印中新平衡为主题的会议出现涉华消极言论；官方涉华表态总体基调积极，强调合作沟通。中国政府在对印关系上主动作为、开拓进取初见成效。时任国务委员杨洁篪、王毅外长去年12月分别访印，引导中印关系回稳向好。两国就涉藏、边界、马尔代夫政局等问题保持沟通，增进互信。王毅外长在两会记者会上有关中印要“龙象共舞，而非龙象争斗”的表态在印引发积极反响。
三是舆论环境之变。去年洞朗对峙事件使印涉华舆论环境一度恶化，负面舆论“一边倒”。自中印关系转圜以来，在两国政府积极引导下，两国关系发展的舆论环境也有所好转，印涉华舆论总体基调有所回调。印政商学界有识之士开始反思对华政策负面效应，纷纷建言献策，主张从长远战略考量和维护自身利益出发，稳定并发展对华关系。舆论环境改善与政府政策导向一定程度上呈现出相互促进的态势。
未来走向：塑造积极态势
当然也要看到，此次大辩论依然有不少疑华惧华噪音。这些论调难以跳出地缘政治和冷战思维的窠臼，视中国为印大国崛起竞争对手，渲染中国战略和军事“威胁论”，指责印政府对华示弱、绥靖，主张与美日联手平抑中国影响力。中国政府对此应有充分认识，在加强对印关系积极引导的同时，也应防止印方在消极力量鼓动下出现反弹和新的问题。
但从总体看，此次印对华政策大辩论，对推动中印关系发展具有积极正面意义。中方应对印调整对华政策、推动两国关系重回正轨的努力表示欢迎，呼吁印方相向而行，塑造并巩固双边关系积极发展势头。一是加强战略互信。与印方加强战略沟通，增进共识，争取相互理解、相互支持，避免相互猜忌、相互消耗。二是推动共同发展。强调中印双方应视对方发展为机遇而非挑战，是伙伴而非对手，合作共赢，共谋发展。三是妥善管控分歧。尊重彼此关切，照顾彼此利益，通过对话解决分歧，管控敏感问题，消除误解和疑虑。
在笔者封笔时，看到新闻联播播放习主席应约同印度总理莫迪通电话的消息。这是中印关系发展的又一积极迹象，也将引导印度朝野对华政策大辩论释放更多积极信号，有利于塑造中印关系未来发展积极态势。
http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-03-23/doc-ifyspkiw7782201.shtml
印高官：“亦敌亦友”体现中印智慧 值得世界学习
2018年03月23日 09:18
环球网
0
印度报业托拉斯3月22日文章，原题：阿克巴鲁丁说世界可以学习印中“亦敌亦友”关系 印度驻联合国最高外交官赛义德·阿克巴鲁丁表示，印度和中国是“亦敌亦友”关系，两国尽管存在分歧但仍然相互合作，全世界都应该学习这种关系。
“在好莱坞，有一个已变得相当流行的热词。我认为那就是‘亦敌亦友’。那也是印度与中国的关系。我们与他们（中国）接触，我们也与他们竞争。在一些领域，我们与他们共同合作，但在（另外）一些领域，我们尊重彼此间的分歧并继续前行”，本周二印度常驻联合国代表阿克巴鲁丁表示。
当天，这位印度资深外交官在美国乔治敦大学回答学生提问时表示，印度已在中国发起的亚投行等发展倡议上与中国合作，但对“一带一路”倡议持保留态度。去年，由于担心500亿美元的中巴经济走廊项目涉及其主权问题，印度没有参加中国举办的引人瞩目的“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛。
不过在阿克巴鲁丁看来，虽然中国和印度是“亦敌亦友”，但其他国家能从中印两国之间的这种关系中学到经验。“或许其他国家能从我们（两国）关系中学到的是，尽管两国有着世界上尚未最终划定的最长边界，但最近40年来那条边界上没有出现任何人员伤亡”，他说。而这显示了中印两国政府和人民的智慧。（丁雨晴译）
India was advised to lay down the subordinates to comply with the rising trend of China and do a good job of relations with China.
India was advised to lay down the subordinates to comply with the rising trend of China and do a good job of relations with China.
0
Source: Global Network
Original title: India should be placed in accordance with China's rising trend and I have a good relationship
Chu Liu: India’s opposition to China’s great atmosphere
(The author is a Sino-Indian research scholar)
In recent days, a rare debate on China’s policy in the history of China-India relations is being unveiled in India. The broad debate involved a wide range of participation. Political, military, business, and media and think tanks were all involved in varying degrees. The topics were varied, ranging from strategic and political security discussions, to exchanges and cooperation in economy, trade, humanities, and other fields. We hope to focus on this issue. Through the review and forward-looking development of China-India relations, we will rethink how to look at China, how to look at India, and how to see the future direction of bilateral relations.
The paradox about China: two positive arguments
In this great debate, the voice of active balance and objective rationality in China has increased. The following two arguments deserve attention:
The first is the opportunity theory. He advocated China's development as an opportunity and actively supported the improvement of bilateral relations. Well-known scholars such as Kurkani and others believe that China's development experience has important implications for India and brings huge opportunities for neighboring countries including India. India is the second largest investor and largest fund-contributing country in the AIIB. Using the AIIB funds to participate in the “Belt and Road Initiative” will help India improve its own infrastructure and regional interconnection and interoperability. Both India and China are BRICS countries and SCO member states, and their common interests have increased on such issues as globalization, free trade and change. After the convocation of the 19th and the Ninth Congress, China’s continued policy continuity under President Xi’s leadership was conducive to the realization of the “two hundred years” long-term goal, and it also added certainty to the development of China-India relations. The improvement of China-India relations will create more favorable internal and external conditions for Indian development. India and China should join hands in creating the "Asian Century."
The second is balance theory. It is believed that the cognition of India and China should be more objectively balanced, and it is necessary to cooperate and guard against it. The “Hindu” and other media commented that the current rapid increase of regional and international influence in China and the confrontation with China are not conducive to India’s own development, but will also put pressure on India and the West, and do not meet India’s interests. The United States is not a reliable partner, and India cannot put eggs in a basket. India needs to cooperate with major countries, including China, and seek balance between different regional mechanisms. At the same time, the growth of China’s strength has doubled the diplomatic pressure surrounding India. India should strengthen its own national defense and economic strength, focus on expanding maritime security cooperation, and resolutely safeguard national security and interests.
China-India Relations: Three Positive Changes
The reason why the current round of India-China policy debate has more objective and rational voices is related to the current overall positive trend in the Sino-Indian relations and the warming up and warming. It also reflects the three major changes in China-India relations:
The first is the change of strategic situation. The current gap between Indian and Chinese strengths has continued to widen. China’s total GDP is more than five times that of India. The printing media themselves also lamented that China's GDP grew by 6.5%, which is equivalent to India's GDP growth of 40%. India is expected to catch up with China in the short term and its own strength and influence are difficult to compete with China. China’s diplomatic strategy is more proactive and aggressive. It has actively led the direction of globalization, promoted cooperation and peaceful development in the surrounding regions, and demonstrated the style of a big country. It also drew the world’s attention. Although many voices regard China’s development and strategic progress as challenges, more people of insight think that India should respond to the development of the world and the rising trend of China, attach importance to reviewing and adjusting its China policy, and “putting it aside” to make a good relationship with China. Cooperation replaces confrontation. India and China are neighbors that cannot be moved. India cannot abandon the opportunities brought about by the development of its relations with China, and it is even more difficult for it to bear the cost of confrontation with China.
The second is the change of government orientation. The September meeting between the leaders of China and India in Xiamen made an important strategic lead for the development of bilateral relations. Since then, both governments have committed themselves to actively guiding China-India relations to turning pages and opening new chapters. The Modi government hopes to stabilize China-India relations and enhance its status as a big country in India. Recently, the Indian government has continued to release positive signals for the development of relations with China: Officials continue to disclose news of Indian Prime Minister, foreign ministers, and foreign ministers visiting China; issued directives prohibiting officials from participating in activities of the Dalai Clique, and promoting the change in the so-called commemorative events and the policy concerning Tibet. Corrective action; requested the Defense and Analysis Institute under the Ministry of National Defense to delay the convening of a “Global Perspective on India-China Relations” seminar to avoid negative comments from China on the subject of the New Balance between India and China; the overall tone of the official statement concerning China is positive. Emphasize cooperation and communication. The Chinese government has achieved initial success in its relations with India. At the time, Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi and Foreign Minister Wang Yi visited India in December last year to steer the Sino-Indian relations back to stability. The two countries maintain communication on issues concerning Tibet, the borders, and the political situation in the Maldives and increase mutual trust. Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the press conference of the two associations expressed their positive reaction to India's position that China and India are to "dance the dragon as a dance, rather than the dragon elephant fight."
The third is the change in the public opinion environment. Last year, the incident involving the Donglang incident made the environment of India's public opinion about India worsen. The negative public opinion was “one-sided”. Since the transition of Sino-Indian relations, under the active guidance of the governments of the two countries, the public opinion environment for the development of the relations between the two countries has also improved, and the overall tone of India-China public opinion has been pulled back. The people of insight in the Indian government and business circles began to reflect on the negative effects of China's policies. They have offered suggestions and suggestions, and advocated that from the perspective of long-term strategic considerations and safeguarding their own interests, they should stabilize and develop relations with China. Public opinion environmental improvement and government policy guidance have shown mutual promotion to some extent.
Future Trends: Creating a Positive Situation
Of course, we must also realize that there are still many doubts about the noise in this great debate. These arguments are difficult to jump out of the geopolitical and Cold War mentality, seeing China as a rising Indian rival, rendering China's strategy and military "threat theory," accusing the Indian government of showing weakness and appeasement, and arguing that the United States and Japan will join forces to stabilize China's influence. The Chinese government should have a full understanding of this. While strengthening the active guidance of India-India relations, it should also prevent the Indian side from appearing a rebound and new problems under the influence of negative forces.
However, on the whole, the current India-China policy debate has positive and positive significance in promoting the development of China-India relations. The Chinese side welcomes India's efforts to adjust its China policy and push the bilateral relations back on track, and urges the Indian side to move in the opposite direction to shape and consolidate the positive development momentum of bilateral relations. The first is to strengthen strategic mutual trust. Strengthen strategic communication with India, increase consensus, seek mutual understanding, support each other, and avoid mutual suspicion and consumption. The second is to promote common development. Emphasizing that both China and India should regard the development of the other party as an opportunity rather than a challenge. It is a partner, not an adversary, that wins cooperation and seeks common development. The third is to properly manage differences. Respect each other's concerns, take care of each other's interests, resolve differences through dialogue, manage sensitive issues, and eliminate misunderstandings and doubts.
When I was writing the pen, I saw the news that President Xi’s press conference hosted President Modi’s telephone conversation with Indian Prime Minister Modi. This is another positive sign for the development of China-India relations. It will also guide India’s opposition to the wilderness policy to release more positive signals and help shape the positive development of Sino-Indian relations in the future.
Http://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-03-23/doc-ifyspkiw7782201.shtml
Senior Officer of India: "Friends of Friends and Friends" Reflects China-India Wisdom It is Worth Learning in the World
March 23, 2018 09:18 Global Network
0
Indian Press Trust March 22 article, original title: Akbarrudin said the world can learn India's "friends and friends" relationship Sayyed Akbaruddin, India's highest diplomat in the United Nations, said that India China is an "adversary friend and friend" relationship. Despite differences, the two countries still cooperate with each other and the whole world should learn this relationship.
"In Hollywood, there is a hot word that has become quite popular. I think that is 'friends and friends.' That is also the relationship between India and China. We contact them (China) and we also compete with them. We cooperate with them in the field, but in (other) areas, we respect their differences and continue to move forward,” said Akbaruddin, the Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations on Tuesday.
On the same day, the senior Indian diplomat said in response to a student question from Georgetown University in the United States that India has cooperated with China on the development initiatives initiated by China such as the Asian Investment Bank, but has reservations about the "Belt and Road Initiative." Last year, due to concern that the US$50 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project related to its sovereignty, India did not participate in the eye-catching "Belt and Road" International Cooperation Summit organized by China.
However, in Ake Barrudin's view, although China and India are "enemy friends", other countries can learn from the relationship between China and India. "Maybe other countries can learn from our (two) relations that although the two countries have the longest border that has not yet been finalized in the world, there have been no casualties on that border for the past 40 years," he said. This shows the wisdom of the Chinese and Indian governments and peoples. (Translated by Ding Yuqing)
S400
防空系统
防空导弹
90年代以前，印度也购买过大量俄制武器. This set of equipment, in addition to a number of launch vehicles, what is included in the radar logistics support command, can be described as ready-to-use, "very intimate." The "Warszawa Daily" also mentioned a senior official of the Indian Army procurement delegation, saying that "buying these missiles is as simple as going to a restaurant for dinner." This may be to express that India does not lack money, or it may express its determination. Of course, this boldness is certainly welcome by Russia. Recommended reading: China's latest big project will be built, so that Americans are afraid, but the United States netizens comment super bright eye For details, please search WeChat public number: sinamilnews But to pay, there is a problem. According to the Warsaw Life News, in October 2017, when the two countries negotiated at the final stage before shipment, the Indian side suddenly mentioned that “it is difficult to pay the full amount because of economic problems. Is it possible to use loans or pay in installments? Way to settle.” The Russians’ response was resolute, either to pay off in a singleton, or not, without a third way, even to talk about it. [IMG] Before the 1990s, India also purchased a large quantity of Russian-made weapons. The attitude of the Russians may loosen up other countries, but it is probably not possible for India, although it is an "arms-buying old customer." The Russians clearly remember that this old customer also owed a lot of money to Russia because of arms purchases in the 1970s and 1980s. In the 1990s, the currency value of the Russian currency plunged, and India has come to this time to “complete early settlement of arrears,” which is not much different from the fact that the paper is also a piece of paper—this approach is tantamount to taking advantage of people’s dangers. This in turn owes money to the Indians. It is clearly impossible to have such a disgraceful history. (Author's signature: Military home))
