- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,564
- Points
- 113
It is not surprising you had a sad childhood, given your spiteful nature.
On the contrary. I had a great childhood. Failing Chinese was a badge of honor in my days. :p
Reminder to SG peasant stock
- Thread starter Leongsam
- Start date
On the contrary. I had a great childhood. Failing Chinese was a badge of honor in my days. :p
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,824
- Points
- 0
That explains it! Time to get Leongsam a shrink to get past his childhood trauma and we'll see less spiteful chinkie threads. 
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 647
- Points
- 0
Yes, it is a very ancient language that hasn't changed much. But whatever the language, you will find that there will always be something lost when you translate it into another language, hence the term, lost in translation. This is especially so when terms with subtle differences are translated into the same term in another language. As an example, both 怀念 and 想念 are translated to miss in English, yet the two terms clearly convey different meanings.
For someone who is truly bilingual or multilingual, he will understand that it is a loss to humanity when a language is lost. Just like it is a loss if a species of animal or plant became extinct (you may claim it is survival of the fittest but you can't deny it is a loss nonetheless and you may never even realise how big a loss it is). I view the diversity of languages as something to be celebrated. My only regret is that the average human brain is not capable enough to handle vastly different languages easily.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,564
- Points
- 113
If everyone spoke the same language, the world would be a much better place.
Diversity divides.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 647
- Points
- 0
If everyone is of the same skin colour and spoke the same language, I will bet you anything that humankind will devise up another scheme to differentiate among the people.
Homogeneity will never be the solution to the problem of "scarce" resources. "Scarce" because not everyone agrees on the quantity defined as scarce.
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2008
- Messages
- 65,564
- Points
- 113
I will bet you anything that humankind will devise up another scheme to differentiate among the people.
They already have that. It's called "religion".
Diversity divides and diversity aids the natural selection. So don't diss it.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2008
- Messages
- 647
- Points
- 0
They already have that. It's called "religion".
Precisely, not to mention that even people of the same faith are killing each other because they belong to different denominations of the faith.
As I have said, diversity is not the cause of conflict, the desire for conflict is built into our genes, diversity or no diversity. The earlier we understand this, the earlier we become more rational about our phobias towards each other. In fact, I believe the Chinese are more advanced than other civilisations in understanding this. The only problem is that conflict avoidance is not a very smart strategy if no one else is practising it.
Last edited:
