• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

REIT has not hands in increased in rental ??????

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
12,510
Points
113
This is by far the joke for me.

It due to asset enhancement that your rental increase. It is not due to the shareholders receiving dividends

===========================================================================================================+



SINGAPORE: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have no impact on retail rents, which are being driven up by the malls' location and enhancements instead of their ownership.

This is according to a study conducted by the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI), following a growing perception that rental prices at retail malls acquired by REITs are rising at a faster rate.

After removing factors such as location and asset enhancement initiatives at malls, "we find that the rents in REIT-owned malls are not statistically different from rents in single-owner malls", the report said.

"Furthermore, among the malls that are acquired by REITs, we find no evidence to indicate that the rents in these malls increased as a result of the acquisition," it added.

The study, covering rental data from 35 REIT-owned malls and 76 single-owner malls between 2000 and 2013, followed inquiries over the impact of REITs during the Budget debate in March, when Workers' Party's Non-constituency MP Mr Yee Jenn Jong said that REITs are dominating the retail malls and are in a position to steeply raise rental prices.

"Nonetheless, (rental increase) appears to be largely driven by the better physical characteristics of the REIT-owned malls... like asset enhancements and distance to the nearest MRT station," the MTI report said. It added that further analysis will be conducted on whether acquisition by REITs has improved the performance of retailers to justify higher rental prices.
 
This is by far the joke for me.

It due to asset enhancement that your rental increase. It is not due to the shareholders receiving dividends

==============================================================
........

This is according to a study conducted by the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI), following a growing perception that rental prices at retail malls acquired by REITs are rising at a faster rate.

After removing factors such as location and asset enhancement initiatives at malls, "we find that the rents in REIT-owned malls are not statistically different from rents in single-owner malls", the
........

Is this meant to be an insult to the intelligence of the readers or an indication of the stupidity of the study team. A fool would know that REIT is setting the pace of rental increase for the single-owner mall to follow. REIT which controlled the majority of the malls basically cornered the retailers with their rental increases as they have no where else to go. The single-owners are no angel nor fool not to follow the increases.

I was amazed that I no longer find food and shopping in Japan expensive. A good authentic Japanese meal at the airport cost only about $16. Here, I would need to pay double the price and I will getting garbage quality. A bun in any Japan shopping mall is the same or cheaper than here. Really wonders where we are heading as quality is dropping but the cost keeps increasing.
 
Is this meant to be an insult to the intelligence of the readers or an indication of the stupidity of the study team. A fool would know that REIT is setting the pace of rental increase for the single-owner mall to follow. REIT which controlled the majority of the malls basically cornered the retailers with their rental increases as they have no where else to go. The single-owners are no angel nor fool not to follow the increases.

I was amazed that I no longer find food and shopping in Japan expensive. A good authentic Japanese meal at the airport cost only about $16. Here, I would need to pay double the price and I will getting garbage quality. A bun in any Japan shopping mall is the same or cheaper than here. Really wonders where we are heading as quality is dropping but the cost keeps increasing.

true.
japan gives more value for every dollar spent there.
i would estimate i spent 30-50% less in hokkaido than in spore - for every damn thing.
 
That's true. Rent is the number one killer of small businesses. Where I live, the rent increases after every HDB upgrading programme. Some shops close for good, or move away to a cheaper location. Others stay on by subletting half or two-third of their original shop space, and struggle to stay afloat.

On the topic of REITs, you're making the problem worse when you invest in REITs. Maybe if you're less of a dividend whore and have a little ethical consideration when it comes to making your investments, the situation may yet improve.
 
Yes, no single owner mall is going to sit around while the rent is rising. See the comment from one of its own GLC

DBS economist Irvin Seah, for instance, feels that Singapore has overdone what it set out to achieve and should backpedal. He believes that a sizeable amount of commercial and industrial property should come under government control, to serve as a benchmark for the market.

"Right now, what we have is an oligopolistic structure, with a small group of players in this market, which makes it prone to price rigging," he said.

"It is not so much about bringing prices down, but about ensuring that we have a lever on certain scarce resources (such as land). The Reit model may work in big countries with ample land but less so for land-scarce Singapore."

Is this meant to be an insult to the intelligence of the readers or an indication of the stupidity of the study team. A fool would know that REIT is setting the pace of rental increase for the single-owner mall to follow. REIT which controlled the majority of the malls basically cornered the retailers with their rental increases as they have no where else to go. The single-owners are no angel nor fool not to follow the increases.
.
 
MTI is doing what MOM does - very selective.

http://mypaper.sg/business/split-reits-impact-business-20140307
Published on Mar 07, 2014
Split on Reits' impact on business
LEE MEIXIAN THE BUSINESS TIMES
CALLS in Parliament for the Government to rein in industrial and commercial rents or reverse JTC's land divestment programme to "buy back some of the Reits" have sparked mixed responses from market watchers, with some in agreement and others cautioning against tinkering with free market principles.

A decade ago, JTC divested most of its industrial property, saying at the time that the move would create a more open and vibrant market by giving the private sector more freedom to operate flexibly to accommodate industry needs.

However, on Tuesday, during the Budget debate, Member of Parliament Inderjit Singh (Ang Mo Kio GRC) called the divestment "a mistaken policy".

"The Government lost the ability to influence rental prices, resulting in developers and investors (including Reits) making the money - this is passive income and not productive income benefiting the investors," he said.

It's a debate that has been cropping up in recent years as businesses reel from rising costs. Some economists agree that Singapore has over-embraced its free market approach and needs to recalibrate, especially with the proliferation of real-estate investment trusts (Reits).

DBS economist Irvin Seah, for instance, feels that Singapore has overdone what it set out to achieve and should backpedal. He believes that a sizeable amount of commercial and industrial property should come under government control, to serve as a benchmark for the market.

"Right now, what we have is an oligopolistic structure, with a small group of players in this market, which makes it prone to price rigging," he said.

"It is not so much about bringing prices down, but about ensuring that we have a lever on certain scarce resources (such as land). The Reit model may work in big countries with ample land but less so for land-scarce Singapore."

Yet others found Mr Singh's suggestion too "drastic" and "excessive". They warned against being too quick to point fingers at Reits as the culprit for rising business rents. Rather, they suggested that it could be a case of supply lagging demand.

CIMB economist Song Seng Wun said: "Everyone forgot while squabbling on the ground level as to who's to blame, but if you take a few steps back, it is because there is plenty of demand for space out there. Economics 101: this allows landlords to yank up rentals."

In this case, solving the supply problem may prove more effective. Patience is also needed because physical completion of properties takes time, he said.

It may even be a good problem to have if landlords have no difficulty finding tenants for commercial and industrial spaces as this may mean Singapore has been successful in attracting businesses that want to expand here, he added.

Several commercial and industrial Reits that BT contacted did not want to comment, but an industry player who declined to be named said that Reits themselves also face the same problems of rising costs that tenants face, including labour (for security guards and cleaners, for instance), land rents and property taxes, which help to justify rent adjustments.

That is not to say that profit is not on Reit managers' minds when they revise rents. It is the landlords' playground now, and they are motivated to maximise their return on investment, given that they are listed vehicles and answerable to unitholders, said the industry player.

This leads them to raise rents when they think the market can take it, while taking care not to tip the balance, lest their tenants pull down their shutters and leave, which is not in their interests.

For Reits, the question is "how much can you push prices before businesses need a breather?", noted Mr Song.

On Monday, Nominated MP R. Dhinakaran also warned of the danger of the speculative element in commercial and industrial property.

"An asset value being pushed higher by several times makes little sense with no significant underlying change to the value offered to (the) tenant... If the asset value is fuelled by trading on a speculative basis without any underlying benefit changing (such as higher traffic for the tenant), it is bound to disrupt economics for the operating business," he said.

But the industry player pointed out that JTC has tightened conditions on lease assignments to discourage "flipping" - such as implementing longer prohibition periods before sellers can sell the property, as well as a longer minimum occupation period for anchor tenants in sale and leaseback programmes.

[email protected]
 
Is this meant to be an insult to the intelligence of the readers or an indication of the stupidity of the study team. A fool would know that REIT is setting the pace of rental increase for the single-owner mall to follow. REIT which controlled the majority of the malls basically cornered the retailers with their rental increases as they have no where else to go. The single-owners are no angel nor fool not to follow the increases.

I was amazed that I no longer find food and shopping in Japan expensive. A good authentic Japanese meal at the airport cost only about $16. Here, I would need to pay double the price and I will getting garbage quality. A bun in any Japan shopping mall is the same or cheaper than here. Really wonders where we are heading as quality is dropping but the cost keeps increasing.

statisticians will create a study to prove a desired outcome/result.
 
Everyone knows that land is scarce in Singapore. It carries a high premium. If Goh Keng Swee, Hon Sui Sen and Ngiam did not offer cheap rental thru the Govt regulated JTC , no small and medium sized businesses would have survived. And Singapore would not have grown so much faster.

Imagine if in the 60s and 70s we allowed Capitaland and Mapletree who are all GLCs run our industrial estates?
 
See the title of the article below.

Singapore REITs Yield World’s Best Returns: Southeast Asia
By Pooja Thakur Sep 5, 2012 2:29 AM GMT+0100 0 Comments Email Print
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Save

Singapore’s real estate investment trusts, the best performing in the world this year, are luring investors after a shopping spree for properties across Asia gives them a broader stream of rental income.
Singapore’s real estate investment trusts, the best performing in the world this year, are luring investors after a shopping spree for properties across Asia gives them a broader stream of rental income.

Singapore’s $38 billion REIT market has returned an average 37 percent in 2012, twice the gains in the U.S., U.K. and Japan, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Australia, the largest REIT market in the Asia-Pacific region with $86 billion, advanced 24 percent.

Growth among Singapore REITs was led by asset acquisitions and rental appreciation, with total rental revenue increasing 5.8 percent annually between 2008 and 2011, according to property broker CBRE Group Inc. In the first half, Singapore REITs were the second-most active purchasers after Japan in Asia, buying assets in Australia, China, Japan, Malaysia and South Korea, and accounting for 33 percent of acquisitions by the region’s REITs since 2009, CBRE said.

“Singapore remains amongst the last few AAA rated economies,” Priyaranjan Kumar, Singapore-based regional director of the capital markets group at broker Cushman & Wakefield, said in an interview. “Its real estate market has received unprecedented attention from most investors as it’s seen to offer a good proxy for the increasingly recognized strength of the Asian consumer.”


Photographer: Munshi Ahmed/Bloomberg
An elevated view shows the buildings in Singapore's skyline.
The gap between their yield and interest rates is double that in Australia, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Property trusts in the island-state offer an average 413 basis- point income return premium relative to 10-year government bonds, while in Australia they average 192 basis points, data compiled by Bloomberg showed. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

Game Change

Singapore’s REITs have a dividend yield of 6.47 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That compares with to 4.97 percent in Hong Kong and 5.01 percent in Australia.

Economic growth in the Southeast Asian island-nation across the Johor Strait from Malaysia will probably accelerate to 3.9 percent next year from 2.7 percent in 2012, the International Monetary Fund forecast in its World Economic Outlook report in April. The advanced economies, including the U.S. and U.K., are estimated to expand 2 percent in 2013.

“The game has changed from capital appreciation to capital preservation,” Tim Gibson, a Singapore-based fund manager for Asia-Pacific property equities at Henderson Global Investors, said.

Budget Surplus

Singapore boasts the world’s biggest budget surplus relative to economic output, adding to demand for its currency as Europe’s fiscal woes roil global markets, the IMF said. The Singapore dollar is the best performer this year after the Philippine peso among the 11 most-traded Asian currencies tracked by Bloomberg. Singapore is one of seven nations with AAA ratings and stable outlooks from Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings.

Tax incentives, which include exemptions on foreign income received by Singapore-listed REITs and distributing at least 90 percent of their income as dividends to unit holders, also helped boost demand.

Singapore offers a pipeline of assets from developers, a fair regulatory environment and a base of international investors and quality sponsors, Jason Kern, Hong Kong-based managing director and head of real estate and lodging advisory for Asia-Pacific at HSBC Holdings Plc, said in an interview. A sponsor is a developer with a stake in the REIT and whose properties form the trust’s pipeline of assets to be purchased.

Outperforming Stocks

“Coming out of the global financial crisis, investors have focused on transparent, predictable markets with sustainable income profiles,” Cushman’s Kumar said.

Singapore REITs also have a liquid secondary market, low transaction costs, and low leverage compared with Japan and other large REIT markets, Kumar added.

Four of the top 10 best-performing REITs with assets of more than $250 million in the region are from Singapore, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Including dividend yields, Frasers Commercial Trust (FCOT) has returned 58 percent this year, AIMS AMP Capital Industrial REIT 48 percent, and Keppel Land Ltd.’s K-REIT Asia (KREIT) 46 percent.

Singapore REITs have outperformed the city-state’s benchmark Straits Times Index, which has climbed 13 percent this year. The 10-year government bond yield in Singapore was 1.38 percent as of Aug. 29. Adjusted for inflation, Singaporean savers currently receive a negative real return on their savings of 4.79 percent.

Market Recovery

The REIT market in the Asia-Pacific region is worth $205 billion, more than before the global financial crisis, according to the Asia Pacific Real Estate Association. European REITs are below the levels before the crisis, while North America, the world’s largest REIT market, has seen assets climb 82 percent from December 2007, the data showed.

Singapore is the region’s third-largest REIT market after Australia and Japan’s $45 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The real estate market in Singapore recovered sharply after the first quarter of 2009, with prime rents and capital values increasing in excess of 60 percent over lows during the global financial crisis, according to New York-based Cushman.

Total investment turnover for Asian REITs reached US$7 billion during the first six months of the year, a 14 percent decline from the second half of 2011, on concerns over the eurozone debt crisis and the weaker outlook for the regional economy, Los Angeles-based CBRE said.

More Selective

“Although Asian REITs are expected to remain in buying mode, they will likely turn more selective towards future acquisitions, with yield enhancement and insulation from the global economic slowdown emerging as important criteria,” CBRE analysts Ada Choi and Leo Chung wrote in a report on Asia’s REIT market last month.

Earnings growth, or distribution per unit of Singapore REITs, will slow to 4 percent in the two years ending 2014, with the previous highs of a 13 percent growth rate between 2006 and 2008 appearing unachievable, Singapore-based analysts, led by Derek Tan, at DBS Group Holdings Ltd. said in an Aug. 21 note. Maturing portfolios will add to slowing growth, Tan said.

The outlook for Singapore’s commercial-leasing segment is becoming more challenging and the funding environment is likely to become more volatile over the next two years, Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Wee Khim Loy said in a note on Aug. 2. A dislocation in the credit markets may cause significant financial stress because the trusts rely on bank funding, the rating company said. Leverage levels of most office REITs could become weak if property values decline by as much as 10 percent, it said, maintaining a negative outlook for the office segment.

Uncertain Outlook

Still, Singapore REITs are well placed to weather tight operating conditions as the trusts have increased their financial flexibility and diversified their funding sources, the rating company said.

There remains ample room for future growth in REITs as prime rents remain 25 percent to 30 percent off their peak in the second quarter of 2008, Kumar said. At current yields, Singapore REITs are attractive for investors looking for total returns, he said.

“There are a lot of uncertainties in terms of economic outlook, so investors are actually looking for stability, defensive earnings,” Eddy Loh, a Singapore-based equity strategist for Asia at Barclays Plc, said in a phone interview. “Coupled with the fact that we still have a very low interest rate environment and the dividend yields for some of these REITs can go up 6 percent to 7 percent that seems to be very attractive to investors actually.” Loh is advising clients to bet on industrial and retail REITs.

REIT IPOs

The three-month Singapore Interbank Offered Rate is at an all-time low of just under 0.4 percent, compared with a peak of 3.56 percent in 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The performance of real estate trusts is prompting a flurry of initial share sales by REITs that may top $2 billion, with as many as six companies planning to list their assets, according to HSBC’s Kern. That’s the most since 2010 when Singapore REITs raised $4.13 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Ascendas Hospitality Trust (ASHT) raised about S$459 million ($369 million) in July, while Far East Organization, Singapore’s biggest closely held developer, drew S$717.6 million in an initial share sale of a hotel trust last month.

“If we think we are five years through a lost decade from a global economic standpoint, then we will see money flowing into REITs as people will continue to chase yields,” Gibson said. “Unless we see interest rates increasing at any point in time, then that will stop the party, but I don’t think you need to be dancing too close to the door just yet.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Pooja Thakur in Singapore at [email protected]
 
RUN consistently avoids shopping malls that reduced the water pressure in toilets for handwashing after they are taken over by REITs.
:oIo:
wash hands also so miserable.
 
Amazing the streets of Singapore are paved with gold and here I am sitting at my shytty minimum wage job in pinoyland and Bollywood land.

There has to be someway I can benefit from this Disneyland shythole.
 
RUN consistently avoids shopping malls that reduced the water pressure in toilets for handwashing after they are taken over by REITs.
:oIo:
wash hands also so miserable.

Yeah, especially those taps that squirt out a little water for a split second when their sensor detects your hands. :rolleyes:
 
On the topic of REITs, you're making the problem worse when you invest in REITs. Maybe if you're less of a dividend whore and have a little ethical consideration when it comes to making your investments, the situation may yet improve.

Yes sir, Reits are not bonds. Capital loss/gain from Reits are much higher than bonds.
Just consider REITs as a dividend equity play.
 
Is this meant to be an insult to the intelligence of the readers or an indication of the stupidity of the study team. A fool would know that REIT is setting the pace of rental increase for the single-owner mall to follow. REIT which controlled the majority of the malls basically cornered the retailers with their rental increases as they have no where else to go. The single-owners are no angel nor fool not to follow the increases.

I was amazed that I no longer find food and shopping in Japan expensive. A good authentic Japanese meal at the airport cost only about $16. Here, I would need to pay double the price and I will getting garbage quality. A bun in any Japan shopping mall is the same or cheaper than here. Really wonders where we are heading as quality is dropping but the cost keeps increasing.


It is meant to insult our intellegence !
 
It is meant to insult our intellegence !

Here's some summary:
For US: Goldman said Fed will hike rate in mid-2015
For Malaysia: UOB said that rates will be increased by min. 25 to 50bp within a year
For Singapore: UOB Economic Treasury Research anticipates the 10Y S$ SOR, which is closely associated with 10Y SGS, to reach 2.55% by end-13, 2.65% by end-14 and 4.0% by end-15.

Some REITs are heavily geared and failed to achieve respectable organic growth (means they depend on borrowing money to expand their portfolio)
So, if interest rates are going to be higher in 2015, going forward, REITs will have limited upside.
 
Some REITs are heavily geared and failed to achieve respectable organic growth (means they depend on borrowing money to expand their portfolio)
So, if interest rates are going to be higher in 2015, going forward, REITs will have limited upside.

S’pore vulnerable to rise in US interest rates: Deutsche Bank
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore/s-pore-vulnerable-to-rise/1114058.html
Singapore's highly leveraged household and banking sector will face some difficulties when US interest rates go up, according to a study by Deutsche Bank, which covers 10 economies in Asia ex-Japan.
 
Bye, Singapore: the hottest new stopover cities for Australians
http://www.smh.com.au/travel/bye-si...er-cities-for-australians-20140522-38qzy.html

art-Dubai-203-620x349.jpg


We used to be a popular shopping destination for Bruneians, Aussies, Indonesians, Japanese tourists for big-ticket items.
High rentals and strong SGD have ruined singapore's reputation as a shopping paradise.
 
The issue is the USA gahmen will still want to keep the USD low to compete with china and get more fdi into the usa. If the usd goes up too much...the us economy will slow as their exports will take a hit...
 
This is by far the joke for me.

It due to asset enhancement that your rental increase. It is not due to the shareholders receiving dividends

===========================================================================================================+



SINGAPORE: Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) have no impact on retail rents, which are being driven up by the malls' location and enhancements instead of their ownership.

This is according to a study conducted by the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI), following a growing perception that rental prices at retail malls acquired by REITs are rising at a faster rate.

After removing factors such as location and asset enhancement initiatives at malls, "we find that the rents in REIT-owned malls are not statistically different from rents in single-owner malls", the report said.

"Furthermore, among the malls that are acquired by REITs, we find no evidence to indicate that the rents in these malls increased as a result of the acquisition," it added.

The study, covering rental data from 35 REIT-owned malls and 76 single-owner malls between 2000 and 2013, followed inquiries over the impact of REITs during the Budget debate in March, when Workers' Party's Non-constituency MP Mr Yee Jenn Jong said that REITs are dominating the retail malls and are in a position to steeply raise rental prices.

"Nonetheless, (rental increase) appears to be largely driven by the better physical characteristics of the REIT-owned malls... like asset enhancements and distance to the nearest MRT station," the MTI report said. It added that further analysis will be conducted on whether acquisition by REITs has improved the performance of retailers to justify higher rental prices.

Thats really really dumb. Its as good as saying COE has not increased cost of car ownership or FT has not caused Sinkies to be squeezed out of jobs...etc
 
Back
Top