• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Raymond Ng has actually won a defamation case! Gets awarded one dollar. Judge deems his reputation undeserving of protection.

Insouciant

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
29,417
Points
113


Raymond Ng has actually won a defamation case! Gets awarded one dollar. Judge deems his reputation undeserving of protection.​


r/SingaporeRaw - Raymond Ng has actually won a defamation case! Gets awarded one dollar. Judge deems his reputation undeserving of protection.


The funniest outcome ever.
 


Did Raymon Ng actually win in SGDC 136?​

Ah yes. Another triumphant legal victory.

Let’s take a closer look.

Step 1: Win by Default (i.e. Nobody Showed Up)​

The defendant didn’t appear.

So the court did what courts do:

  • Entered default judgment
  • Treated the claim as uncontested
Which, in plain English, means:

Not exactly a courtroom showdown. More like winning a match because your opponent didn’t turn up.

Step 2: The Big Payday​

After all that…

The damages awarded were:

Yes. One dollar.

Not “symbolic victory” in the triumphant sense. More like:

Step 3: The “This Doesn’t Add Up” Moment​

The claim:

  • Reputation destroyed
  • Career affected
  • Family relationships impacted
All because of this one Facebook share.

The court’s response?

Judicial-speak for:

Step 4: The Reputation Issue​

This is where it gets unusually sharp.

The court didn’t just say:

  • “We don’t see much damage”
It went further:

That’s not routine. Courts don’t usually go there unless something is seriously off.

Between:

  • exaggerated claims
  • credibility issues
  • surrounding context
…the judge basically concluded:

Step 5: The RICE Media Backstory​

Also relevant:

  • There was an earlier lawsuit against RICE Media
  • It was dismissed
  • Due to failure to comply with discovery
Which the court here noted—with some visible impatience.

Not exactly the foundation of a strong case.

Step 6: Final Judicial Mood​

The closing line says it all:

That’s not subtle.

So What Was This “Win”?​

Let’s translate the narrative:

  • Yes, there was a default judgment
  • No, the court did not validate the alleged harm
  • No, the court did not award meaningful damages
  • Yes, the court questioned credibility
  • Yes, the court effectively said this case shouldn’t have been brought

Final Observation​

This is the legal equivalent of:

Winning by forfeit,
asking for a trophy,
and being handed a receipt for $1.
 
Back
Top