Ravi Philemon: All TOC did was report Lee Wei Ling’s accusation – and *that* is considered defamation?

[micromachine]

How can PM Lee Hsien Loong suggest that since he had presented his side of the story in Parliament with full cabinet support, that ought to settle the issue once and for all?

I echo Dr Tan Cheng Bock who recently said:

DPM Heng (Swee Keat) also said I contradicted myself when I cited the example of the debate in Parliament of 38 Oxley Rise as an example of lack of transparency. His idea of transparency is to have it debated in Parliament surrounded by an overwhelming majority of his own party members with no right of reply from the other parties. Lee Hsien Yang was not in the house to explain his position. Was this even the right place for this debate? Where is the transparency and accountability? It shows that his very understanding of transparency is deeply flawed. This is very troubling.​

Singaporeans are still very much clueless about who is telling the truth and who is not. Or, who is hiding facts and who is unraveling them. We will be none the wiser unless a proper judicial verdict is pronounced with all the evidence presented, and after appeals have been filed.

More at https://tinyurI.com/y25rg829

 

[batman1]

Pinky look so insecure.

 

[laksaboy]

Lee Hsien Loong is the tinpot dictator of a totalitarian shithole. What's this, lese majeste?

 

[glockman]

Voters really need to wise up, stop fucking around and put our country on the right path again. So many things are wrong, one needs to be a fucking retard to not know.

 

[bobby]

Is this a personal suit? Then why got letter issued by PMO?

 

[mojito]

Is this a personal suit? Then why got letter issued by PMO?

This is call clean wage.

 

[chucky]

Sometimes looks can be deceiving, but not in his case.

Pinky look so insecure.

 

[micromachine]

Lee Hsien Loong is the tinpot dictator of a totalitarian shithole. What's this, lese majeste?

what's wrong with emulating the thai king?