• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Putin now command more nuke than Obama

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://m.sohu.com/n/404857592/?wscrid=1137_16


外媒:美报告称俄罗斯部署核弹头数量首超美国
10-04 12:53 新华网
20 放到桌面

2010年5月6日,“白杨-M”洲际弹道导弹车参加俄罗斯卫国战争胜利65周年阅兵式总彩排。(资料图片)
据参考消息10月4日报道 * 外媒称,俄罗斯战略核力量的运载工具和已部署核弹头数量自21世纪以来首次与美国旗鼓相当。

据俄罗斯《导报》10月3日报道,根据美国国务院公布的美俄战略武器交换信息,截至9月1日,美国和俄罗斯分别拥有核武运载工具912件和911件,已部署核弹头1642枚和1643枚。

俄军事专家帕维尔·波德维格表示,已部署弹头和运载工具增加的原因是俄海军近年来开始装备携带“布拉瓦”多弹头导弹的955型核潜艇。此外,三弹头的“亚尔斯”洲际导弹开始替代停止部署的“白杨-M”单弹头导弹。他认为,到2018年俄美第三阶段削减战略武器条约的某些限制生效时,俄美战略核力量将保持对等。同时,21世纪头10年俄核力量的削减速度比美国更快,因为俄销毁退役运载工具的速度更快。

前俄罗斯国防部官员认为,俄核弹头数量赶上美国的另一个原因是“白杨”导弹销毁速度放慢。不过,这些导弹仍将在2018年前被销毁,届时美国又将在核弹头数量上获得一点优势。

据美国《华盛顿时报》网站10月1日报道,美国国务院公布的有关国家武器装备最新数量统计结果显示,俄罗斯部署的核弹头数量首次超过美国。

10月1日公布的相关信息一览表称,俄目前在洲际弹道导弹、潜射弹道导弹和重型轰炸机上共部署了1643枚核弹头,美国则共部署1642枚核弹头。

基于《新削减战略武器条约》的要求在9月1日作出的相关报告而得到的俄罗斯核弹头计数结果比上一次在3月1日宣布的数量增加了131枚。美国报告说,该国在同一时期核弹头数量增加了57枚。尚不清楚为何两国部署的核弹头数量都出现增长。

在运载系统方面,最新出炉的信息一览表揭示出目前俄罗斯的武器库情况—已部署的洲际弹道导弹、地下井发射的弹道导弹以及重型轰炸机总数为528,比之前的498有所增加。

前五角大楼战略武器专家马克·施奈德说,最新得出的信息一览表证实了俄在签署《新削减战略武器条约》时仍希望加强该国已部署的核武库力量。

施奈德说:“俄罗斯核武库力量的增强似乎反映出该国在武装两艘新的"北极风"级弹道导弹潜艇。”


搜狐新闻
APP
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nukes are useless and waste of taxpayers monies if you don't use them!!

Wrong. Dead Wrong!

Would be soon inevittable to use almost ALL of them.

Distress and desperation levels in many nuke powers are getting into extreme irreversibly.

There is no way of any limited half way nuke war, nothing other than all out is possible.
 
Last edited:

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.inquisitr.com/1516084/vl...both-countries-believe-theyll-win-cold-war-2/






Posted in: Politics Posted: October 3, 2014
Vladimir Putin Has Russia’s Nuclear Weapons Surpassing The U.S. Already, Both Countries Believe They’ll Win Cold War 2

Vladimir Putin has made no secret of the fact that he intends on having Russia’s nuclear weapons surpass the United States in capability. But apparently the Russians have already won the arms race in sheer numbers, if not in capabilities. But some experts are warning that both Russia and the U.S. believe they can win a Cold War 2, which may cause harm to bother countries in the long run.


In a related report by the Inquisitr, the thousands of Russians who marched in the streets of Moscow last month claim Vladimir Putin represents the “war party.” Attempts at deescalating tensions have Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov suggesting the Kremlin and the White House should hit the reset button on relations, although he also blames the United States for making this difficult. In contrast, Russian chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov claims Putin is a bigger threat to the United States than ISIS or 1,000 al Qaeda terrorist groups. All the saber rattling has American writers living in Russia trying to remind the world that Putin is not the Russian people.

The fact that Russia’s nuclear weapons now outnumber U.S. nuclear weapons came to light when the U.S. State Department released documents about the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). Back in 2012, the U.S. had 1,722 nuclear weapons deployed, while Russia’s nuclear weapons were counted at 1,499 WMDs. As of 2014, the Obama administration has reduced the U.S. nuclear arsenal down to 1,642 nuclear weapons. In contrast, Vladimir Putin has increased Russia’s numbers up to 1,643, which means they barely hold the edge on numbers.

Sen. James Inhofe, a Republican on the Senate Committee on Armed Services, wrote in Foreign Policy that he blames both President Obama and Vladimir Putin for the current situation.

“The White House was at best naïve to Russian duplicity; at worst, it was complicit,” Inhofe wrote. “Russia used the arms control process to reduce the threat posed by U.S. strategic nuclear forces, while simultaneously pursuing alternative nuclear capabilities — such as cruise missiles — in support of its military strategy and national security. The United States under President Obama, on the other hand, has tried to set a disarmament and nuclear nonproliferation example by reducing the role and numbers of nuclear weapons in U.S. strategy in the hope that the rest of the world would follow. It hasn’t. What’s harder to explain, is why we let them get away with it.”

In the same time frame, China’s nuclear weapons capabilities have also increased and the U.S. Navy has been discussing strategies to deal with any worst case scenario.

As the world seemingly enters Cold War 2, Paul J. Saunders, executive director of the Center for the National Interest, released a collection of essays from Russian and American experts about how each nation is treating the current Ukraine crisis. The overall conclusion seems to be that both countries believe they can realistically “win” the coming long-term confrontation.

“The overarching conclusion of the four papers is that both the U.S. and Russian governments are likely to believe that they possess acceptable policy options to not only confront one another but to impose significant costs on the other party if necessary,” writes Saunders, who warns that the “foundation of this judgment…is a failure to recognize the potential price that their own nation may pay in a direct conflict or (more likely) in a long-term adversarial relationship.”

While Vladimir Putin continues to pursue the goal of modernizing Russia’s nuclear weapons, the Russian people are already starting to pay the price of this global confrontation. Global investors pulled about $850 million out of the country in 2014 and the Russian economy increased by only 1.3 percent instead of the previously projected 3.9 percent. If tensions continue to escalate, the economic collateral damage may only become worse, never mind if Pope Francis’ version of World War 3 continues to spread.



Patrick Frye
Category: Politics
Tags: Cold War 2, Nuclear weapons, russia, Russia Nuclear Weapons, ukraine, Ukraine War, US Nuclear Weapons, Vladimir Putin, WMD
Love it? Share it!
16
Articles And Offers From The Web

by TaboolaSponsored LinksFrom the Web
 
Last edited:

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news...documents/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS



For the first time, Russia has more deployed nuclear warheads than U.S.
Report on case of Army Pfc. Bradley Manning identifies lapses in security, personnel procedures


AP10ThingsToSee - In this Friday, Sept. 26, 2014 photo, released by the U.S. Air Force, a U.S Air Force KC-10 Extender refuels an F-22 Raptor fighter aircraft prior to strike operations in Syria. The F-22s, making their combat debut, were ... more >
By Bill Gertz - The Washington Times - Wednesday, October 1, 2014
For the first time, Russia, which is in the midst of a major strategic nuclear modernization, has more deployed nuclear warheads than the United States, according to the latest numbers released by*the*State Department.

Russia now has 1,643 warheads deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The United States has 1,642, said the fact sheet released Wednesday.

Ads by Adblade
Web Offers

8 Hot Restaurants Owned By Celebrities

10 ideas for a great first date

Funniest Vine Compilation of 2014
The warhead count for the Russians, based the Sept. 1 report required*under the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), shows an increase of 131 warheads since the last declaration on March 1. The U.S. reported a warhead increase of 57 during the same period. It is not clear why the warhead numbers increased.

PHOTOS: BOOM! U.S. military turns terror targets to rubble

The treaty limits each side to 1,550 deployed warheads, 700 deployed missiles and bombers and 800 deployed and non-deployed launchers.

On New START delivery systems, the latest fact sheet reveals that the current Russian arsenal of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles, silo-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers is 528, up from 498.


An investigative report on the case of Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, who ... more*>
Mark Schneider, a former Pentagon strategic weapons specialist, said the latest fact sheet confirms Russian officials’ promises during New START ratification to increase their deployed nuclear arsenal.
 
Last edited:

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
For once and for all, this is possitively identifying Russia as the world #1 nuke super-power. Not the bankrupt USA any longer.


:rolleyes::cool::cool::cool::cool:
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
155543712.jpg





3m14-image244.jpg



bulava1.jpg



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSM-56_Bulava

RSM-56 Bulava
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is about the Russian ballistic missile. For the ceremonial mace of the same name, see Bulawa.
R-30 (RSM-56) Bulava [1]
Bulava.png
Bulava missile variants
Type SLBM
Place of origin Russia
Service history
In service 10 January 2013[2]
Used by Russian Navy
Production history
Designer Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology
Manufacturer Votkinsk Plant State Production Association
Specifications
Weight 36.8 t (36.2 long tons; 40.6 short tons)
Length 11.5 m (38 ft) (without warhead)
12.1 m (40 ft) (launch container)
Diameter 2 m (6 ft 7 in) (missile)
2.1 m (6 ft 11 in) (launch container)
Warhead 6 (can carry 10) re-entry vehicles with a yield of 150 kt each.[3]
Engine three stage, solid propellant and liquid fuel
Operational
range
10,000 km (6,200 mi)
[4][5]
Guidance
system
inertial, possibly with stellar sensor and/or GLONASS update
Launch
platform
Borei-class submarines
Typhoon-class submarine Dmitri Donskoi

The Bulava (Russian: Булава, lit. "mace"; designation RSM-56, NATO reporting name SS-NX-32, GRAU index 3M30) is a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) developed for the Russian Navy and deployed in 2013 on the new Borei class of ballistic missile nuclear submarines. It is intended as the future cornerstone of Russia's nuclear triad, and is the most expensive weapons project in the country.[6] The weapon takes its name from bulava, a Russian word for mace.

Designed by Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology, development of the missile was launched in the late 1990s as a replacement for the R-39 solid-fuel SLBM.[5] It is expected that the first three Borei-class submarines will carry 16 missiles, while the following five vessels will carry 20 missiles. Development and deployment of the Bulava missile within the Russian Navy is not affected by the enforcement of the new START treaty.[7]

The missile's flight test programme was problematic. Until 2009, there were 6 failures in 13 flight tests and one failure during ground test, blamed mostly on substandard components. After a failure in December 2009, further tests were put on hold and a probe was conducted to find out the reasons for the failures. Testing was resumed on 7 October 2010 with a launch from the Typhoon-class submarine Dmitri Donskoi in the White Sea; the warheads successfully hit their targets at the Kura Test Range in the Russian Far East.[8] Seven launches have been conducted since the probe, all successful. On 28 June 2011, the missile was launched for the first time from its standard carrier, Borei-class submarine Yury Dolgorukiy, and on 27 August 2011 the first full-range (over 9,000 km (5,600 mi)) flight test was conducted. After this successful launch, the start of serial production of Bulava missiles in the same configuration was announced on 28 June 2011. A successful salvo launch on 23 December 2011 concluded the flight test programme. The missile was officially approved for service on 27 December 2011,[9] and was reported to be commissioned aboard the Yuri Dolgorukiy on 10 January 2013. The missile did however continue to fail in the summer of 2013 and was not operational as of November 2013.[10]

Contents

1 Description
2 Development history
2.1 Inception
2.2 First tests
2.3 Troubles
2.3.1 Explanations for the failures
2.3.2 Effects on the military
2.3.3 Debate about the program
2.3.4 Probe
2.4 2010 tests
2.5 2011 tests and deployment
2.6 2012 tests and deployment
2.7 2013 deployment
3 Timetable
4 Service
5 References
6 External links

Description

The Bulava missile was developed by Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology under the leadership of chief designer Yury Solomonov. Although it utilizes some engineering solutions used for the recent Topol-M ICBM, the new missile has been developed virtually from scratch.[11] Bulava is both lighter and more sophisticated than the Topol-M. The two missiles are expected to have comparable ranges, and similar CEP and warhead configurations.

The missile has three stages; the first and second stages use solid fuel propellant, while the third stage uses a liquid fuel to allow high maneuverability during warhead separation. The missile can be launched from an inclined position, allowing a submarine to fire them while moving. It has a low flight trajectory, and due to this could be classified as a quasi-ballistic missile.[12] The missile possesses advanced defense capabilities making it resistant to missile-defense systems. Among its abilities are evasive maneuvering, mid-course countermeasures and decoys, and a warhead fully shielded against both physical and electromagnetic pulse damage. The Bulava is designed to be capable of surviving a nuclear blast at a minimum distance of 500 metres (1,600 ft).[citation needed]

The Bulava's advanced technology allows it to carry up to 10 hypersonic, individually guided, maneuverable warheads with a yield of 100–150 kt each.[12]

Borei-class submarines carrying Bulava missiles are expected to be an integral part of the Russian nuclear triad until 2040.[13]
 
Last edited:

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://barentsobserver.com/en/security/2014/09/successful-bulava-missile-launch-white-sea-10-09

Successful Bulava missile launch from the White Sea

"Vladimir Monomakh" outside Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk. (Photo: from news.mail.ru)

Russia’s strategic nuclear-powered submarine «Vladimir Monomakh» has for the first time launched a Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile. According to official sources, the missile hit its target on the Kamchatka Peninsula in the Far East.
By
Trude Pettersen
September 10, 2014
Location
Related
First Borey sub gets Bulava missiles
Russia to resume Bulava tests

The launch was made from underwater position in the White Sea on Wednesday morning. The parameters of the missile trajectory were normal and the warheads successfully arrived at the Kura test site on Kamchatka, General Major Igor Konashenkov says to ITAR-TASS.

This is the first time “Vladimir Monomakh” launches a Bulava missile. The submarine was launched from Sevmash shipyard in December 2012, started mooring tests in January 2013 and has been conducting sea trials in the White Sea since June 2014.

Russia has not launched any Bulava missiles since September 2013, when “Alexandr Nevsky” fired its first test missile. The launch was unsuccessful and resulted in a halt of all trials of new submarines until the missile system could be further tested. The incident had been caused by production flaws, according to the commission investigating the failed launch.

Test launches of the Bulava have been experiencing significant problems since the start of the project. Of the 19 or 20 test launches that have been done since 2004, eight have been officially declared unsuccessful. However, some analysts suggest that in reality the number of failures is considerably higher. Russia has one rebuilt Typhoon class submarine it uses as test platform for the Bulava missiles. The nearly forty years old “Dmitry Donskoy” is the world’s largest submarine and the only vessel testing the missile system from 2004 until “Yury Dolgoruky” launched its first missile in June 2011.

“Vladimir Monomakh” is the third of a total of eight Borey class submarines that Russia plans to build by 2020. The first submarine of the class, “Yury Dolgoruky”, was taken into service in the Northern Fleet in January 2013 after twelve years of construction.

Both “Vladimir Monomakh” and the next submarine of the class, ”Alexandr Nevsky” will probably be put into service in the Pacific Fleet and have base in Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka .

The construction of “Vladimir Monomakh” started in 2006. It is originally based on an Akula class hull from 1992. The submarine is 170 meters long, can go 29 knots submerged, it has a crew of 107 and will be equipped with 16 Bulava missiles, which each can carry ten nuclear warheads.

The fourth and fifth vessel in the Borey class, “Knyaz Vladimir” and “Knyaz Oleg” are under construction at the Sevmash shipyard in Severodvinsk. The first one of these two was laid donw in July 2012, the second in July 2014.

View the discussion thread.
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://www.ibtimes.com/russia-fires-nuclear-missile-hits-target-3500-miles-away-1684390


Russia Fires Nuclear Missile, Hits Target 3,500 Miles Away

By Dennis Lynch@neato_itsdennis on September 10 2014 12:00 PM


rtr43u8z.jpg

Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with top officials representing Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and the European Union in Minsk, Aug. 26, 2014. Putin said the crisis in Ukraine could not be solved by a further military escalation or without dialogue with representatives of the country's Russian-speaking eastern regions. Reuters/Alexei Druzhinin/RIA Novosti/Kremlin

Russia successfully tested its latest Bulava intercontinental nuclear missile Wednesday amid rising tensions with NATO over the conflict in Ukraine. The nearly 37-ton missile was launched from Russia’s new submarine, the Vladimir Monomakh, as part of its sea trials. Deputy Defense Minister Yuriy Borisov said a total of five test launches are planned.

The Vladimir Monomakh, named after a medieval prince, fired the inter-continental ballistic missile from the White Sea near Russia’s border with Finland and hit its target nearly 3,500 miles away on the Kamchatka peninsula north of Japan. The Russian Navy's head, Adm. Viktor Chirkov, was aboard the Vladimir Monomakh for the launch.

The Borei-class Vladimir Monomakh can carry up to 16 Bulava missiles, which can each carry up to 10 nuclear warheads. The Bulava missiles have a range of 5,000 miles and can reportedly cause a blast 100 times larger than the atomic bombs the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Bulava system has been plagued with troubles, including at least eight unsuccessful test-fires. Borei-class submarines have to successfully test fire Bulava missiles to be accepted by the Russian Navy.
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://barentsobserver.com/en/security/2014/10/more-100-new-nukes-northern-waters-02-10

More than 100 new nukes in northern waters


submissilelaunch_1.jpg


Latest data exchange on nuclear weapons held by Russia and the United States shows the first Post-Soviet increase in numbers of strategic warheads sailing the Barents- and White Sea.
By
Thomas Nilsen
October 02, 2014
Related
Russia builds huge nuclear missile depot in Severomorsk
More nukes on Kola
Carl Bildt: - Withdraw tactical nukes from Kola

The Bureau of Arms Control with the U.S. Department of State released the latest exchange of data under the New START treaty with Russia on October 1st.

Compared to October 1st 2013, Russia’s number of both deployed nuclear warheads and deployed launchers has increased substantially. The number of deployed ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles), SLBMs (Submarine Launched Ballistic Missiles) and Heavy Bombers (Tu-95 and Tu-160) increased from 473 in the autumn 2013 to 528 this autumn.

The increase in deployed nuclear warheads was 243, from 1,400 a year ago to 1,643 today.

The numbers listed in the U.S. fact sheet do not specify where and which launchers that are the reason for the increase. But, as reported by BarentsObserver this spring, the Northern fleet’s newest strategic missile submarine, the “Yury Dolgoruky”, got its full set of Bulava missiles in June. The submarine can carry 16 missiles and each Bulava-missile can hold up to six warheads, making up for a total of 96 warheads on that single submarine. It is, however, unlikely that “Yury Dolgoruky” has 16 missiles with full set of warheads. Normally a ballistic missile submarine carries one or more missiles without warheads, ready for test-launches like the one from the second new Borey-class submarine, the “Vladimir Monomakh” on September 10th, as reported by BarentsObserver.

Two submarines can hold 192 warheads
The blog-site Russian strategic nuclear forces, argues that it is most likely the two new Northern fleet submarines that make up for most of the increase in deployed strategic nuclear weapons in Russia over the last six months. Those two alone can hold 192 warheads, but since the increase, according to the official figures, is 131 since last information exchange in March, the two submarines are likely not fully loaded.

Russian Northern fleet Delta-IV submarine in surface position in the Barents Sea. (Photo: Thomas Nilsen)

The third Borey-class submarine, the “Aleksandr Nevsky” is still test-sailing from the yard in Severodvinsk and is therefore not included to the Northern fleet. In total, Russia will get eight new Borey-class submarines.

Russia’s other seabased launchers of ballistic missiles include six Delta-IV class submarines. They are sailing for the Northern fleet with homeport in Gadzhievo on the Barents Sea coast of the Kola Peninsula northwest of Murmansk.

Tactical nuclear weapons are not included in the exchange of information under the New START treaty and information about the amount of such warheads is uncertain.

Four out of five warheads at Kola
Senior Research Fellow with the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment, Kristian Åtland, says to BarentsObserver that if the figures are correct, it means that 81,5 percent of Russia’s sea-based strategic nuclear weapons are deployed at the Kola Peninsula.

“If this is correct, it means that the number of sea-based strategic nuclear warheads on Kola has increased by 32 percent since last year,” Kristian Åtland says.

“It also means that 81,5 percent of of Russia’s sea-based nuclear weapons, 422 out of 518, is deployed at naval bases on the Kola Peninsula and only 18,5 percent, are with the Pacific fleet,” he says.

The defence researcher, however, says this could change over time, since some of the Borey-class submarines are planned to be based with the Pacific fleet.

“There is no doubt that the long-lasting period of disarmament now has changed to rearmament,” says Kristian Åtland.

Lavrov: Investment is long-overdue
Interviewed by RT last week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov argues that the investment in military hardware is a long-overdue modernization and not a sign of a looming new arms race.

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. (Photo: Thomas Nilsen)

“I don’t think we are on the verge of a new arms race. At least, Russia definitely won’t be part of it. In our case, it’s just that the time has come for us to modernize our nuclear and conventional arsenals,” Lavrov said and continued:

“We have a long-term armament program, which takes into account our economic situation and, of course, the need to have efficient and modern defensive capabilities to protect our national interest.”
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
Putin is world #1 nuke power

Xi Jin Ping is world #1 $CASH$ power

Obama is world # debts and burdens full of shits and dreams

HUAT AH!
 

nkfnkfnkf

Alfrescian
Loyal
of course. So build so many for what

There are too much number of humans on over populated planet all refusing to die and want to occupy and consume the limited resources left on the planet. Nuke is useful to settle this crisis. Compell huge number of the human populaton to die and leave behind the remaining resources.

Most practically effective and the most important. When nukes hits all arguments will stop. No more waste of time.
 

steffychun

Alfrescian
Loyal
There are too much number of humans on over populated planet all refusing to die and want to occupy and consume the limited resources left on the planet. Nuke is useful to settle this crisis. Compell huge number of the human populaton to die and leave behind the remaining resources.

Most practically effective and the most important. When nukes hits all arguments will stop. No more waste of time.

Then best to nuke Singapore. Stop FTs.
 
Top