• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Promiscuous SCDF horny slut make police report over leaked sex video with different men.

Valium

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.tnp.sg/news/singapore/fe...-leaked-online

https://forums.fuckwarezone.com.sg/images/statusicon/wol_error.gifThis image has been resized.Click to view original image



Investigations ongoing into how her private videos were allegedly stolen and posted by a former partner online

The police are investigating a series of sex videos that began circulating online last month.

Some of the clips - most lasting less than a minute each - feature a female officer in a Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) uniform.

An SCDF spokesman told The New Paper that the officer has lodged a police report, and it is providing her with counselling support.

"SCDF is aware of several private videos of a female officer posted online," he said.

"As police investigations are ongoing, we are unable to comment further."

Descriptions and titles of the videos uploaded onto sex forums and pornographic sites mentioned the SCDF and the woman's particulars.

The woman is identified in some of the videos as her face can be clearly seen.

The videos allegedly feature different men, though they cannot be identified as their faces cannot be seen.

TNP understands the SCDF officer's phone was allegedly hacked and the private videos were stolen, and that the person who posted the videos online was her former sexual partner.

Some of the clips have since been taken down.

POSSIBLE OFFENCES
Mr James Ow Yong of Kalco Law said several offences may have been committed in this case.

The person who hacked the woman's phone could face a charge of unauthorised access to computer material.

It is an offence under the Computer Misuse Act and carries a jail term of up to two years, or a fine of up to $5,000, or both.

Anyone who disseminates the videos, including sharing them through reposts, may be committing an offence of transmitting an obscene video through electronic means, an offence under the Penal Code.

Mr Ow Yong said each video could constitute one separate charge, and upon conviction, offenders may be jailed for up to three months, or fined, or both, for each charge.

He added that sharing the woman's details may also be an offence under harassment laws.

"One who publicises the woman's particulars could be prosecuted under harassment laws if such conduct is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing or likely to cause the woman harassment, alarm or distress," he said.

"In such an event, one could face a fine of up to $5,000, or imprisonment of up to six months, or both.
 

Valium

Alfrescian
Loyal
One who publicises the woman's particulars could be prosecuted under harassment laws if such conduct is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing or likely to cause the woman harassment, alarm or distress," he said.

Let me get this right.

This fucking slut made multiple porn videos of herself with different cocks in her cheebye.

This fucking slut's phone kena "hacked". Ya right.

It's illegal to mention this slut's name or to spread her videos?

Fuck this scdf slut and her fucking village cheebye.

Fuck you ugly slut Rachel!
This slut is getting fucked in her own station wearing uniform.
 
Last edited:

Valium

Alfrescian
Loyal
CLUES
Rachel
Jie wei
Ugly slut
34 videos
455 MB
SCDF uniform
5/6 different men

All recorded with her own phone.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
The party who started this chain of offences is none other than the person(s) who made the the recording in the first place and it is clearly stated in the films act that it is an offence punishable with a huge fine and/or imprisonment.

So why are they going after everyone except the source of the problem?

https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/FA1981#pr29-

Offences involving dealings in obscene films 29.—(1) Any person who makes or reproduces any obscene film (whether or not for the purposes of exhibition or distribution to any other person), knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(2) Any person who imports any obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(3) Any person who distributes, or has in his possession for the purposes of distributing, to any other person an obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $80,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(4) Any person who exhibits or has in his possession for the purposes of exhibiting to any other person an obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
Possession of obscene films 30.—(1) Any person who has in his possession any obscene film shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $20,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(2) Any person who has in his possession any obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $80,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
The party who started this chain of offences is none other than the person(s) who made the the recording in the first place and it is clearly stated in the films act that it is an offence punishable with a huge fine and/or imprisonment.

So why are they going after everyone except the source of the problem?

https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/FA1981#pr29-

Offences involving dealings in obscene films 29.—(1) Any person who makes or reproduces any obscene film (whether or not for the purposes of exhibition or distribution to any other person), knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(2) Any person who imports any obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(3) Any person who distributes, or has in his possession for the purposes of distributing, to any other person an obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $80,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(4) Any person who exhibits or has in his possession for the purposes of exhibiting to any other person an obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $100,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
Possession of obscene films 30.—(1) Any person who has in his possession any obscene film shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $20,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.
[10/98]
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(2) Any person who has in his possession any obscene film knowing or having reasonable cause to believe the film to be obscene shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction —
(a)to a fine not exceeding $40,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both; and
[Act 25 of 2018 wef 29/04/2019]
(b)in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $80,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to both.
KNN boss correct KNN just like @ginfreely ownself take naked long dark nipple then threatened to leeport polis KNN this type of people should be punished heavily to deter such behaviours KNN
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"Jie Wei Chan Rachel"

Looks like all of the videos were uploaded to kissjav dot com and then quickly deleted.

The video thumbnails are still available. She's ugly! :laugh:

Ugly = lower standards for men = any dick will do.

1.jpg


1.jpg


1.jpg


1.jpg


1.jpg
 
Top