• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PRC say PAP model of Temasek owning GLCs is fucked up and will not follow it.

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
23,837
Points
113
Chinese official warns SOE reformers against following in Singapore's Temasek footsteps

As government agencies jockey for power in the overhaul of state firms, one senior official has spoken out against following in Singapore's footsteps, saying the Temasek model goes against the spirit of marketisation.

In an online commentary on Tencent Finance, Peng Jianguo, deputy chief of the research centre of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission - which oversees SOEs - wrote that the Singaporean model of setting up a government-owned investment company would not work in China.
He said the Temasek model "does not conform with China's reform direction".

The sole shareholder of Singapore's state investment firm, Temasek, is the city state's Ministry of Finance.

Sources in the decision-making process said earlier that when the shake-up of mainland state firms was complete, two new sets of companies would operate in much the same way as Temasek by channelling funds to SOEs and pressuring them to turn a profit.

But Peng said China's state economy was much bigger than Singapore's and state firms must be supervised by a state-asset investor rather than a government department. "We must not take a U-turn on reform," he wrote.

Peng said that after the reforms central government-owned conglomerates could be grouped into three categories: not-for-profit companies could remain the same; commercial firms with national security or strategic importance could be restructured into state-owned capital investment companies; and commercial enterprises could become state-owned capital operating companies.

All three could stay under the management of a state-assets supervision body, he said.

A separate article on Tencent Finance quoted anonymous sources as saying the Finance Ministry wanted to adopt the Temasek model and be in charge of all state-owned assets but Sasac was vying for the same role as the investor of state assets.

Beijing on Sunday detailed plans to reform SOEs, including the introduction of "mixed ownership" by bringing in private investment to revive inefficient state firms. At a Communist Party top reform steering group meeting chaired by President Xi Jinping yesterday, political leaders agreed that more private capital should be injected into state-owned enterprises.
 
China should replace Xi Jinping immediately. His anti corruption campaign are scaring businesses from making deals with the gahmen agencies. The moment Xi steps down, economy will revive from the pressure built up after years of suppression.
 
State controlled businesses stifle market growth!

That senior official is right!
 
What would the commies know about making money honestly. :rolleyes:
 
Chinese official warns SOE reformers against following in Singapore's Temasek footsteps

As government agencies jockey for power in the overhaul of state firms, one senior official has spoken out against following in Singapore's footsteps, saying the Temasek model goes against the spirit of marketisation.

Singapore's Temasek model was to dominate the local market, privatize the profits and socialize the costs. Good for the PAP aristocrats and elites, bad for the people who have to pay more.
 
Singapore's Temasek model was to dominate the local market, privatize the profits and socialize the costs. Good for the PAP aristocrats and elites, bad for the people who have to pay more.
According to a little bird from the West, the total remuneration for the wife of the Dragon will increase to 40 million USD as her husband has a strong mandate from the electorate to rule Sinkieland for another 5 years.
 
China obviously has studied the Temasek model before making the statements above, and deciding not to follow it. The Chinese are corrupt and money minded. This part is true. But also they are very practical. If something makes sense to them, if something can make money for them, they will beg, borrow, copy or steal it. The fact that they are not following the Temasek models indicates they have identified the serious flaws in it. The main flaw is that the way Temasek is set up, there is not enough oversight and check and balances. That is why Temasek can lose billions of $ and the salaries of its management team are not transparent. Such a system implemented in china is suicidal. The management would simply steal every thing.
 
State controlled businesses stifle market growth!

That senior official is right!

Some 2 to 3 years back, i read an article that shows some figures..( may have varied)

US government control about 1.3 % of the economy

Australia/Malaysia...about 17 %

Singapore government controls an astonishing 55%

NTUC is a classic example.. they are in every business..from cradle to grave. ( oh..my favourite AMK MP, Yeo guat kwang has 64 job titles to ensure their own people are in control of many businesses and companies )

So you see how stifling it is and it kills enterprise..and so it is no surprise that they set up an Entrepreneurial award to remedy this.
 
Some 2 to 3 years back, i read an article that shows some figures..( may have varied)

US government control about 1.3 % of the economy

Australia/Malaysia...about 17 %

Singapore government controls an astonishing 55%

NTUC is a classic example.. they are in every business..from cradle to grave. ( oh..my favourite AMK MP, Yeo guat kwang has 64 job titles to ensure their own people are in control of many businesses and companies )

So you see how stifling it is and it kills enterprise..and so it is no surprise that they set up an Entrepreneurial award to remedy this.

No wonder gdp growth and foreigner is number one.when u have a country run by businesses and businessman.
 
No wonder gdp growth and foreigner is number one.when u have a country run by businesses and businessman.

Yes, its simple numbers. 5.5 million population gives more revenues to GLCs when everyone has to use SMRT, Singpower, rent/buy property, use handphones, etc. 6.9 million population will even give them more and of course, 10 million is jackpot for them.
 
Back
Top