Agree
I note
Do note
It is a mischievous position to take and the gullible fall for it.
Try to post as if you are not talking down to someone like a manipulative motherfucker.
And don't pretend to knock the pap when you are planning to drop a bombshell on the opposition before the next GE, just like you tried to do before GE 2011.
http://singsupplies.com/showthread.php?89550-The-Chen-Show-Mao-Affair
I don't know why ah screw always needs to bring in gullible people and blur fucks like the constant need to put someone else down
Both were in the same year in RI.
1. One came from much poorer family background compared to the other
2. One made an impression in school and one did not.
3. One mixed well with his school cohort and one did not.
4. One did his NS in the Army and the other did it in the Police
5. One mixed well with his NS mates and the other was quiet and aloof
6. One speaks well in public and the other does not.
7. One connects easily with the people and the other struggles.
8. One had to hold a national conversation to find out the country's issues, while the other presumably walked the ground, went online and formed views.
Guess which is which. Becareful and think thru.
Ps. Courtesy of an RI boy after a recent reunion who watched both his classmates go thru life.
My intimate sources reveal that had it not been for his rather advanced age, HSK would have been an automatic shoo-in to be the next seatwarmer PM.
Instead, we now have two general clowns jostling for power and recognition in order to succeed the throne.
Heng Swee Kiat's old man was Wang Sa? one half of famous comedic duo.
Wang Sa's son is in ISD.
Wang Sa's son is in ISD.
My intimate sources reveal that had it not been for his rather advanced age, HSK would have been an automatic shoo-in to be the next seatwarmer PM.
Why should we believe you that what you said is true and representative of either of these 2 persons? Just because you are scroobal?
Yes, A Soh. Driving a nice car with an old car plate. SBB if I am right.
He could have joined the MIW in the late 90s when he was invited. HSK does not strike me as an ambitious man. Wasn't so when he was in the SPF. Not sure if he's a changed man now.
You are either new or blur or both.
whore
Its bullshit central for people to fantasise whatever they want to say or claim.
He could have joined the MIW in the late 90s when he was invited. HSK does not strike me as an ambitious man. Wasn't so when he was in the SPF. Not sure if he's a changed man now.
Both were in the same year in RI.
1. One came from much poorer family background compared to the other
2. One made an impression in school and one did not.
3. One mixed well with his school cohort and one did not.
4. One did his NS in the Army and the other did it in the Police
5. One mixed well with his NS mates and the other was quiet and aloof
6. One speaks well in public and the other does not.
7. One connects easily with the people and the other struggles.
8. One had to hold a national conversation to find out the country's issues, while the other presumably walked the ground, went online and formed views.
Guess which is which. Becareful and think thru.
Ps. Courtesy of an RI boy after a recent reunion who watched both his classmates go thru life.