- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=2]PM Lee, is there a cover-up by EMA?[/h]
October 26th, 2012 |
Author: Contributions
[Letter was copied to TRE]
Good Morning Mr Lee Hsien Loong,
We believed you are our members of parliament in AMK GRC itself. Therefore we
would like to lodge a Very Strong Complaint with regard to “Safety Issues ”
created by your govt’s agency called “Energy Market Authority (EMA)” in
collaboration with their agent called “S.P.P.G.”, which has today damaged our
home very badly vis a vis their “Unilaterally a.k.a. Illegal Implantation of
their Huge And Dangerous Metallised Electrical Pylon Weighing 150 KG Goss Weight
onto our home” thus causing sinking ground problems, cracked perimeter walls,
cracked up floor tilings and deep horizontal impregnated cracks found inside our
rear verandah’s drains!
For the record, all these damages to our home are indeed being found hardly
two to three feet away from their aforesaid EMA’s huge electrical metallised
pylon itself! This is despite our two times on site meetings that we had indeed
highlighted to all the 3 govt’s agencies that in the event their Huge Electrical
Metallised Pylon were to topple over onto either The Church of Saint Vincent De
Paul or onto our home’s itself especially it is being parked hardly 6 feet away
from my daughter’s room. Could you imagine for a moment the kind of Huge Damages
again their Huge Metallised Electrical Pylon would have had impacted on us
all!?
Despite our numerous attempts to resolve following Safety Issues amicably
with both S.P.P.G. and EMA, today, they had simply used their purported P.E.’s
reports against us by just talking through BCA’s staffs that their Implantation
of aforesaid Huge Metallised Electrical Pylon is safe!? This is despite Clear
Cut Evidences by way of Various Photographic Evidences Taken by BCA’s staff,
EMA’s staff and S.P.P.G.’s staff on site meeting on the 7th July 2012 at 3.00
p.m. itself! Kindly peruse attached 9 clear pictures which are indeed self
explanatory!? We would also like to state categorically again that during above
mentioned on site meeting with your 3 govt’s agencies, the S.P.P.G.’s appointed
P.E. said in a very loud and clear voices that the aforesaid huge electrical
pylon could be, Quote: “Partially Responsible For The Sinking Ground’s Effect
Itself!” Un-quote!
We have been trying to asked BCA for their kind assistance in retrieving a
copy of the S.P.P.G. purportedly appointed P.E.’s report not once but twice in a
row, but since more than two months have passed, S.P.P.G. has indeed adamantly
refused to copy to us Members of the Public since!? Kindly peruse following
attached various e-mailed correspondences with your govt’s 3 agencies for a
clearer pictures.
We Strongly Believed our Singapore’s govt had prided themselves Greatly with
regards Transparency on all matters and issues related to Public’s Safety And
Concerns ! Therefore, we are Extremely Upset And Frustrated on why there is a
Huge Cover Ups by S.P.P.G. in collaboration with their principal called EMA? We
would like to Very Sincerely Request your authority to enquire onto both EMA and
S.P.P.G. on Why Their Total Non-Transparency on their Purported P.E.’s reports
to be scrutinized by us, Members of the Public Concerned Since? If there are
indeed really nothing adverse, hidden agendas or clandestine “about their
purported P.E.’s reports that said otherwise against both” S.P.P.G. and EMA
itself, why can’t they copy to us ? This non-transparency actions had indeed
shown that both S.P.P.G. and EMA “were indeed hiding something clandestine with
their purported P.E.’s reports that cannot be seen by us Members of the Public
Concerned ! ?
We shall be most grateful if you could urgently investigate onto above
mentioned ” Safety Issues instituted by both EMA and S.P.P.G. and kindly advise
us via return e-mail ! ? ”
Kind Regards,
.
Mr. And Mrs. Samuel Y. S. Lim And Family Members
N.B. Incidentally we believed more than two months ago, we saw Mr. Teo Chee
Hean on Channel 5’s TV news that he had had indeed advised all the govt’s public
civil servants to uphold ” First Class Civil Services ” to us, Members of the
Public, but to-date, not only have we encountered Extremely Bad Callous
Attitudes from LTA’s bus licensing dept but now S.P.P.G. + E.M.A. also !
.
Editor’s note: We have asked EMA for comments also.
[Letter was copied to TRE]
Good Morning Mr Lee Hsien Loong,
We believed you are our members of parliament in AMK GRC itself. Therefore we
would like to lodge a Very Strong Complaint with regard to “Safety Issues ”
created by your govt’s agency called “Energy Market Authority (EMA)” in
collaboration with their agent called “S.P.P.G.”, which has today damaged our
home very badly vis a vis their “Unilaterally a.k.a. Illegal Implantation of
their Huge And Dangerous Metallised Electrical Pylon Weighing 150 KG Goss Weight
onto our home” thus causing sinking ground problems, cracked perimeter walls,
cracked up floor tilings and deep horizontal impregnated cracks found inside our
rear verandah’s drains!
For the record, all these damages to our home are indeed being found hardly
two to three feet away from their aforesaid EMA’s huge electrical metallised
pylon itself! This is despite our two times on site meetings that we had indeed
highlighted to all the 3 govt’s agencies that in the event their Huge Electrical
Metallised Pylon were to topple over onto either The Church of Saint Vincent De
Paul or onto our home’s itself especially it is being parked hardly 6 feet away
from my daughter’s room. Could you imagine for a moment the kind of Huge Damages
again their Huge Metallised Electrical Pylon would have had impacted on us
all!?
Despite our numerous attempts to resolve following Safety Issues amicably
with both S.P.P.G. and EMA, today, they had simply used their purported P.E.’s
reports against us by just talking through BCA’s staffs that their Implantation
of aforesaid Huge Metallised Electrical Pylon is safe!? This is despite Clear
Cut Evidences by way of Various Photographic Evidences Taken by BCA’s staff,
EMA’s staff and S.P.P.G.’s staff on site meeting on the 7th July 2012 at 3.00
p.m. itself! Kindly peruse attached 9 clear pictures which are indeed self
explanatory!? We would also like to state categorically again that during above
mentioned on site meeting with your 3 govt’s agencies, the S.P.P.G.’s appointed
P.E. said in a very loud and clear voices that the aforesaid huge electrical
pylon could be, Quote: “Partially Responsible For The Sinking Ground’s Effect
Itself!” Un-quote!
We have been trying to asked BCA for their kind assistance in retrieving a
copy of the S.P.P.G. purportedly appointed P.E.’s report not once but twice in a
row, but since more than two months have passed, S.P.P.G. has indeed adamantly
refused to copy to us Members of the Public since!? Kindly peruse following
attached various e-mailed correspondences with your govt’s 3 agencies for a
clearer pictures.
We Strongly Believed our Singapore’s govt had prided themselves Greatly with
regards Transparency on all matters and issues related to Public’s Safety And
Concerns ! Therefore, we are Extremely Upset And Frustrated on why there is a
Huge Cover Ups by S.P.P.G. in collaboration with their principal called EMA? We
would like to Very Sincerely Request your authority to enquire onto both EMA and
S.P.P.G. on Why Their Total Non-Transparency on their Purported P.E.’s reports
to be scrutinized by us, Members of the Public Concerned Since? If there are
indeed really nothing adverse, hidden agendas or clandestine “about their
purported P.E.’s reports that said otherwise against both” S.P.P.G. and EMA
itself, why can’t they copy to us ? This non-transparency actions had indeed
shown that both S.P.P.G. and EMA “were indeed hiding something clandestine with
their purported P.E.’s reports that cannot be seen by us Members of the Public
Concerned ! ?
We shall be most grateful if you could urgently investigate onto above
mentioned ” Safety Issues instituted by both EMA and S.P.P.G. and kindly advise
us via return e-mail ! ? ”
Kind Regards,
.
Mr. And Mrs. Samuel Y. S. Lim And Family Members
N.B. Incidentally we believed more than two months ago, we saw Mr. Teo Chee
Hean on Channel 5’s TV news that he had had indeed advised all the govt’s public
civil servants to uphold ” First Class Civil Services ” to us, Members of the
Public, but to-date, not only have we encountered Extremely Bad Callous
Attitudes from LTA’s bus licensing dept but now S.P.P.G. + E.M.A. also !
.
Editor’s note: We have asked EMA for comments also.
