• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PM lawyers should show the proof

god_zeus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
2,247
Points
48
instead of just scaring pple with their letters
 
Last edited:
The letter only work in Sillypore.
In other country like Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan...............useless
 
Most of the Sinkie when saw lawyer letter. They will urinate in their pant. Really don't understand why. Become more educated but when see a paper with few letter all just hid.
 
Don't forget that in Spore the Lees have NEVER ever lost a case. :eek:
 
Most of the Sinkie when saw lawyer letter. They will urinate in their pant. Really don't understand why. Become more educated but when see a paper with few letter all just hid.

Because Sinkies have witnessed what happened to CSJ, JBJ, TLH etc.
Once the Lees sue you, you're fucked.
Certainly, you can apply for legal counsel (assuming there's a lawyer brave enough to represent you), but even if the chances of winning are hypothetically 50-50, in a long drawn legal attrition battle, you'll lose due to a lack of resources.

In essence, this is hooliganism. Instead, of sending thugs to rough you up or mess up your property, they step on your head in court.
 
Don't forget that in Spore the Lees have NEVER ever lost a case. :eek:

That's because they got their favourite Bayi the Senior Counsel Davinder Singh to do the dirty job for them in court.. No one can fight the Royal FamiLEE.. They own the Kangaroo Court..
 
Last edited:
Don't forget that in Spore the Lees have NEVER ever lost a case. :eek:

So does it mean that to be word class/1st class/international class (like their beloved Table Tennis Team/Youth Olympics), they should also sue all these foreigners in their country of domicile eg Wall St Journal in USA.
This is to remove once and for all remarks like the above.
I am waiting for the day when our top legal brains like Mr Davinder Singh,SC and our top legal firms like the distinguish firm of Drew & Napier pits their legal skills against top lawyers from USA and UK in the laws of defamation.Show the rest we are 1st world and punch above our weight in the legal arena.
 
Last edited:
So does it mean that to be word class/1st class/international class (like their beloved Table Tennis Team/Youth Olympics), they should also sue all these foreigners in their country of domicile eg Wall St Journal in USA.........

I doubt the world cares about what goes on in Spore. The PAP has bought them off with our billions.

One has to wonder if Ho Ching is really that stupid to lose all those billions. Was some of it siphoned into some secret account :confused:
 
I doubt the world cares about what goes on in Spore. The PAP has bought them off with our billions.

One has to wonder if Ho Ching is really that stupid to lose all those billions. Was some of it siphoned into some secret account :confused:


So is yours a fair comment with no actual malice I assume

In the United States, the traditional privilege of "fair comment" is seen as a protection for robust, even outrageous published or spoken opinions about public officials and public figures. Fair comment is defined as a "common law defense [that] guarantees the freedom of the press to express statements on matters of public interest, as long as the statements are not made with ill will, spite, or with the intent to harm the plaintiff"....
The defense of "fair comment" in the U.S. since 1964 has largely been replaced by the ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), (U.S. Supreme Court). This case relied on the issue of actual malice, which involves the defendant making a statement known at the time to be false, or which was made with a "reckless disregard" of whether the statement was true or false. If "actual malice" cannot be shown, the defense of "fair comment" is then superseded by the broader protection of the failure by the plaintiff to show "actual malice."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_comment
 
Last edited:
So is yours a fair comment with no actual malice I assume

I think it's a fair observation & I'm sure many Sporeans have similar concerns & questions. Of course the Lee's control the courts & they can sue anyone with impunity.
They may win a court case, but not the support of the "lesser mortals".

We've all seen this before & it gets tiresome.
 
instead of just scaring pple with their letters

dun insult human being by label sinkies as people.

Should be:

instead of just scaring sinkies easily with their letters.
 
Last edited:
Don't forget that in Spore the Lees have NEVER ever lost a case. :eek:

LKY case against the fomer president Devan Nair..he lost that one.
The Canadian court throw the case out..

Thats the only case i know that LKY did not win...
 
Because Sinkies have witnessed what happened to CSJ, JBJ, TLH etc.
Once the Lees sue you, you're fucked.
Certainly, you can apply for legal counsel (assuming there's a lawyer brave enough to represent you), but even if the chances of winning are hypothetically 50-50, in a long drawn legal attrition battle, you'll lose due to a lack of resources.

In essence, this is hooliganism. Instead, of sending thugs to rough you up or mess up your property, they step on your head in court.

Chiam See Tong won TWICE against PAP
 
Back
Top