• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Please don't bully Raeesah Khan (Khan or not? PAP IB pls don't disturb!)

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Albert Tay's posting didn't age that well now. Albert said "Fuck you, Shanmugam, PAP and the Singapore Police Force."

Lol.... really?


Better archive for future reference.

albert tay.png
 

LexLuthor

Alfrescian
Loyal
The hardcore oppies don't fuck care if she is telling the truth or untruth. However, WP is not going after the hardcore oppies. They want the middle ground voters, and these group will be hard to please if Raeesah is still around. :thumbsdown:
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Khan was naïve to think that the rape victim would have the guts to back her up; she didn't know how almighty is the PAP.

What Khan said was true but the victim just did not dare to go public. Thus Khan had no choice but to publicly retract her statements.

After Khan apologized in Parliament, millionaire minister Indianee, faking empathy, spared her not, repeating everything Khan had said prior. What is the point of that but to tear down Khan completely.

You can't trust sinkees to stand up for themselves, so don't bother standing up for them.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
The hardcore oppies don't fuck care if she is telling the truth or untruth. However, WP is not going after the hardcore oppies. They want the middle ground voters, and these group will be hard to please if Raeesah is still around. :thumbsdown:
Middle ground voters? U mean those who actually have brains and cognitive reasoning? Everyone knows a dud when they see one. And .... oh boy this Raeesah Khan is certainly one stupid broad.
 

orh mee suah

Alfrescian
Loyal
At the moment, I assumed that she's out to ruin the opposition party's reputation.
AS she is/was also an activist who helps victims of sexual abuse, some people can look at her anecdote from another angle and treat it as a fiction based on true events and not label her a liar.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
At the moment, I assumed that she's out to ruin the opposition party's reputation.
AS she is/was also an activist who helps victims of sexual abuse, some people can look at her anecdote from another angle and treat it as a fiction based on true events and not label her a liar.

Any time u hear the word activist, you know they are shit.

Activist = Troublemaker aka Shit Stirrer
 

ChristJohnny

Alfrescian
Loyal
Making mistake or sprout nonsence are different from lying.
Some crimes will land in jail while others will cause you to be hang. There is a distinction.

Race and IQ
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
I’ve seen people being sacked for much less severe matters.

Lying in parliament on 3 separate occasions? That’s far more serious.
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
Victims of these cases just like to move on with life ,esp have family ,married,n worse is the husband Don know abt this,the victim will.not back her up as nothing to gain but lost alot in life,so that why rapist n mata all can act blur to it.but really, salute those victims that stand out to get the offender.She should think twice before telling this as most victims will not testify
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
The moral of the story is: Indians just cannot be trusted.

How about this lovable sibling duo? :rolleyes:

Subhas Nair, brother of influencer Preetipls, charged after claiming govt treats Chinese people 'differently'​


Wan Ting Koh
Wan Ting Koh
·Senior Reporter
Mon, 1 November 2021, 10:20 am·3-min read


Subhas Nair and sister Preeti Nair arriving at the State Courts on 1 November.  (PHOTO: Yahoo News Singapore/Nick Tan)

Subhas Nair and sister Preeti Nair arriving at the State Courts on 1 November. (PHOTO: Yahoo News Singapore/Nick Tan)

SINGAPORE — Subhas Nair, the brother of social media personality Preetipls, was charged in the State Courts on Monday (1 November) with four counts of attempting to promote feelings of ill-will between different groups on grounds of religion and race.

The charges relate to incidents that took place between 2019 and 2020. Subhas, 28, appeared in court with sister Preeti Nair. He donned a shirt with the face of Nagaenthran a/l K Dharmalingam, a convicted drug mule on death row for 10 November.

Subhas, whose full name is Subhas Govin Prabhakar Nair, was originally given a two-year conditional warning for a "racially-charged rap video" on 29 July 2019 which was said to have attempted to promote ill-will between the Chinese and other races. The video, titled “K. MUTHUSAMY – Preetipls & Subhas (F*** It Up – Iggy Azalea & Kash Doll Remix)”, was posted on YouTube and allegedly contained the spoken words “Chinese people always out here f***ing it up”.

The warning, given by the police on 14 August 2019, was issued on the condition that the 28-year-old did not reoffend within the next two years. However, Subhas is said to have offended thrice last year.

On 25 July 2020, Subhas allegedly posted remarks on his Instagram account in response to a video of Chinese Christians who had made hateful comments against another community. “He allegedly commented that Malay Muslims who make the same hateful comments would be treated differently by the authorities compared to the Chinese Christians,” according to a Singapore Police Force release.

According to Subhas' charge sheet, his comment was, “If two Malay Muslims made a video promoting Islam and saying the kind of hateful things these Chinese Christians said, ISD (Internal Security Department) would have been at the door before they even hit ‘upload’.”

On 15 October 2020, in relation to the alleged murder of an Indian man at Orchard Towers on 2 July 2019, Subhas purportedly claimed that one of the Chinese accused persons involved received lenient treatment by the authorities due to his race. He allegedly posted on Instagram, “Calling out racism and Chinese privilege = two year conditional warning and smear campaign in the media. Actually conspiring to murder an Indian man = Half the sentence and ‘You’re having a baby soon right? Boy or girl?’ Do you actually think a brown person would get asked these type of questions? This place is just not for us

On 11 March this year, Subhas allegedly promoted ill-will between Chinese and Indians by exhibiting a cartoon drawing of his 15 October 2020 social media post during an indoor stage performance at The Substation.

His charge sheets states that between 8.30pm and 9.30pm, Subhas displayed a cartoon during a stage play titled, "TABULA RASA – ALBUM EXPLORATION", with the same words from his 15 October Instagram post.

In addition to these incidents, Subhas was charged over the 2019 video - which he made with his sister Preeti - as he had breached the conditions of his conditional warning.

Subhas was represented by lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam, who asked for an adjournment to make representations. He was offered a plea deal by the prosecution but did not indicate if he would accept it.

He was released on bail and his case will be mentioned in court on 29 November.

A person who is convicted of the offence of promoting ill-will between different groups on grounds of religion or race faces a jail term of up to three years, or a fine, or both.
 

coogans

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Thanks for your daft observations and inputs you quitter, now please fuckoff.

Khan was naïve to think that the rape victim would have the guts to back her up; she didn't know how almighty is the PAP.

What Khan said was true but the victim just did not dare to go public. Thus Khan had no choice but to publicly retract her statements.

After Khan apologized in Parliament, millionaire minister Indianee, faking empathy, spared her not, repeating everything Khan had said prior. What is the point of that but to tear down Khan completely.

You can't trust sinkees to stand up for themselves, so don't bother standing up for them.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
What Khan said was true but the victim just did not dare to go public. Thus Khan had no choice but to publicly retract her statements.
You are missing the point. She lied that she accompanied the victim to the police station. For all we know the victim doesn’t even exist.
 

Kee Chew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Khan was naïve to think that the rape victim would have the guts to back her up; she didn't know how almighty is the PAP.

What Khan said was true but the victim just did not dare to go public. Thus Khan had no choice but to publicly retract her statements.

After Khan apologized in Parliament, millionaire minister Indianee, faking empathy, spared her not, repeating everything Khan had said prior. What is the point of that but to tear down Khan completely.

You can't trust sinkees to stand up for themselves, so don't bother standing up for them.


i still Khan will show hand now.

no choice liao.
 
Top