-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Pete Hegseth fucks Chan Chun Sing! Stop focusing on Conferences and Shangri La and instead focus on more Power!
- Thread starter in3deep
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 24,967
- Points
- 113
Tell Chan Chun Sing and PAP that we need more white collar jobs for S'poreans - not more useless SkillsFuture courses that equip unemployed PMETs for a future of continued unemployment and underemployment.
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2022
- Messages
- 2,624
- Points
- 113
What USA DefSec and WarSec Pete Hegseth was saying is that the rest of Humankind, especially the smaller Nations, should grow their military defense capabilities. Dialogues do help to achieve peace, but at the end of the day, the truism of Peace applies naturally - Peace is an oxymoron as it must be defended, not by hot air but by arms and sacrifices.
Specifically, with an Expansionist China whom claimed both Taiwan and the 9 dotted lines demarking the entire South China Seas as theirs, ASEAN should band together and improve such capabilities for defense and deterrence to any potential enemy whom may not just stake entire territorial claims, but even change the way of life of other Nations into their failed Communist political systems.
Such methods had been proven when China marched into Tibet, Hong Kong and Xinjiang. For sure, the Thais would not want to give up on their Buddhism way of life, or Philippines their democratic systems, or Muslim Malaysia and Indonesia give up on Islam way of life......
1. China is a great Nation and should be respected. We Singapore respect China, for its ability to control the masses, their innovative people whom are capable of learning and improving upon current tech and science, of its abilities to uplift 1.4 billion population lives.
However, should China continue with its expansionist aims, then its neighbors would have no choice but to band together to defend our way of life......
The US - Iran war have many lessons for Humankind to learn from, and one of such is how one's Nation's defense capabilities must be enhanced, and we ASEAN should not end up like the Gulf Nations when expansionist TWISTED ISLAMIC republic of Iran conquered Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Libya and then showed their true colors by bombing the SOVEREIGN Gulf Nations outright, when those Sovereign Nations have the right as Nation States to decide their defense policies.
As their military were not strong, they did nothing but sadly saw their military and civilian infrastructures such as water, transport and oil resources bombed, despite the terrorist IRGC claims that ONLY US military bases were targeted.
2. In such a scenario, Singapore, being only a small Nation, would be the 1st to be bombed with missiles in a policy of - killing the chicken to frighten the monkeys.
Singapore is just a piece of rock, BUT it is the People whom had made, maintained and evolved Singapore with our way of life for our todays, AND we Singaporeans are spread out widely across the region and World, with biz and families.
We will return to Singapore, along with those whom survived, and rebuild it to what it was before and better.......
However, for the aggressor, they WILL be destroyed on several fronts and will cease to exist, thru neighbors UPGRADING of DEFENCE CAPABILITIES and REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCES.
May such a scenario never happen, but prevention and deterrence are better than cure, as the Gulf Nations realized today....Let us all Humankind...live and let live....we can only evolve better in peace time and uplift lives across the world while wars will only destroy all.....
Specifically, with an Expansionist China whom claimed both Taiwan and the 9 dotted lines demarking the entire South China Seas as theirs, ASEAN should band together and improve such capabilities for defense and deterrence to any potential enemy whom may not just stake entire territorial claims, but even change the way of life of other Nations into their failed Communist political systems.
Such methods had been proven when China marched into Tibet, Hong Kong and Xinjiang. For sure, the Thais would not want to give up on their Buddhism way of life, or Philippines their democratic systems, or Muslim Malaysia and Indonesia give up on Islam way of life......
1. China is a great Nation and should be respected. We Singapore respect China, for its ability to control the masses, their innovative people whom are capable of learning and improving upon current tech and science, of its abilities to uplift 1.4 billion population lives.
However, should China continue with its expansionist aims, then its neighbors would have no choice but to band together to defend our way of life......
The US - Iran war have many lessons for Humankind to learn from, and one of such is how one's Nation's defense capabilities must be enhanced, and we ASEAN should not end up like the Gulf Nations when expansionist TWISTED ISLAMIC republic of Iran conquered Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Libya and then showed their true colors by bombing the SOVEREIGN Gulf Nations outright, when those Sovereign Nations have the right as Nation States to decide their defense policies.
As their military were not strong, they did nothing but sadly saw their military and civilian infrastructures such as water, transport and oil resources bombed, despite the terrorist IRGC claims that ONLY US military bases were targeted.
2. In such a scenario, Singapore, being only a small Nation, would be the 1st to be bombed with missiles in a policy of - killing the chicken to frighten the monkeys.
Singapore is just a piece of rock, BUT it is the People whom had made, maintained and evolved Singapore with our way of life for our todays, AND we Singaporeans are spread out widely across the region and World, with biz and families.
We will return to Singapore, along with those whom survived, and rebuild it to what it was before and better.......
However, for the aggressor, they WILL be destroyed on several fronts and will cease to exist, thru neighbors UPGRADING of DEFENCE CAPABILITIES and REGIONAL/INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCES.
May such a scenario never happen, but prevention and deterrence are better than cure, as the Gulf Nations realized today....Let us all Humankind...live and let live....we can only evolve better in peace time and uplift lives across the world while wars will only destroy all.....
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
- Messages
- 36,595
- Points
- 113
US captain can fuck SAF Major General?
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 21,400
- Points
- 113
Who is more JLB?
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
- Messages
- 36,595
- Points
- 113
Compare their achievements not bank accounts that one the sinkie sure win hands down
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 114,089
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 9,411
- Points
- 113
Comparing the compensation of U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth with Singapore’s Coordinating Minister for Public Services and Minister for Defence, Chan Chun Sing, highlights two entirely different structural philosophies on how a nation-state values and compensates top-tier executive leadership.
To examine these figures side-by-side from a local perspective, all financial components are evaluated in Singapore Dollars (SGD), using an operational exchange rate of **1 USD = 1.35 SGD**.
Pete Hegseth’s official public compensation as the head of the Pentagon is strictly bound by the U.S.
statutory framework under Level I of the Executive Schedule. This legally caps his annual federal salary at **S$338,310** (US250,600).
The American political structure intentionally implements a flat, non-negotiable pay cap with absolutely no performance-based bonuses, individual incentives, or national growth variables.
However, this low baseline public wage sits in sharp contrast to the massive monetization potential available in the broader U.S. political-media ecosystem. Prior to stepping into public office, financial disclosures indicated Hegseth pulled in roughly **S2.3 million annually** from private network broadcasting contracts and book advances.
In the American context, public service at the Cabinet level is treated as a temporary financial sacrifice that is ultimately flanked by highly lucrative corporate boards, speaking tours, and private media avenues once an official departs from office.
Conversely, Minister Chan Chun Sing’s compensation operates under a benchmark-driven "clean wage" model designed to mirror market realities while eliminating hidden pipelines of post-tenure corporate enrichment.
The baseline "Norm" salary for an entry-level MR4 Singapore Cabinet Minister is structured at **S$1,100,000**, which consists of a 65% fixed base and a 35% variable structure incorporating performance bonuses and national economic indicators.
Given Minister Chan’s extensive seniority, status as a former Chief of Army, and dual portfolio as Coordinating Minister for Public Services alongside Defence, his true positioning on the ministerial scale is expected to place him well above this baseline.
This framework explicitly pegs ministerial compensation to the median income of the top 1,000 Singaporean citizen earners, adjusted downward by a 40% public service discount. Every dollar is accounted for transparently, taxed directly, and leaves no room for auxiliary corporate income, private directorships, or post-office commercialization of government titles while serving the state.
From an analytical and economic viewpoint, these structures present distinct governance trade-offs regarding how institutional talent is retained.
The Singapore system views competitive political compensation as a necessary defense mechanism against systemic corruption and talent drain, deliberately competing with private sector banking, law, and corporate leadership to recruit top minds like Minister Chan upfront.
The state pays a premium immediately to guarantee complete focus, insulate its leadership from external commercial influence, and make public administration a viable career choice for elite professionals without imposing a severe financial penalty on their households.
In contrast, the United States pays its top defense official a comparatively modest civil service wage but implicitly relies on a revolving-door model where an official's personal brand equity outside of government heavily subsidizes their public tenure.
While the U.S. system keeps taxpayer-funded political salaries artificially low to ease public scrutiny, it shifts the financial reward to the private sector before and after office, creating an ecosystem heavily dependent on media influence and corporate transition networks. - Gemini.
To examine these figures side-by-side from a local perspective, all financial components are evaluated in Singapore Dollars (SGD), using an operational exchange rate of **1 USD = 1.35 SGD**.
Pete Hegseth’s official public compensation as the head of the Pentagon is strictly bound by the U.S.
statutory framework under Level I of the Executive Schedule. This legally caps his annual federal salary at **S$338,310** (US250,600).
The American political structure intentionally implements a flat, non-negotiable pay cap with absolutely no performance-based bonuses, individual incentives, or national growth variables.
However, this low baseline public wage sits in sharp contrast to the massive monetization potential available in the broader U.S. political-media ecosystem. Prior to stepping into public office, financial disclosures indicated Hegseth pulled in roughly **S2.3 million annually** from private network broadcasting contracts and book advances.
In the American context, public service at the Cabinet level is treated as a temporary financial sacrifice that is ultimately flanked by highly lucrative corporate boards, speaking tours, and private media avenues once an official departs from office.
Conversely, Minister Chan Chun Sing’s compensation operates under a benchmark-driven "clean wage" model designed to mirror market realities while eliminating hidden pipelines of post-tenure corporate enrichment.
The baseline "Norm" salary for an entry-level MR4 Singapore Cabinet Minister is structured at **S$1,100,000**, which consists of a 65% fixed base and a 35% variable structure incorporating performance bonuses and national economic indicators.
Given Minister Chan’s extensive seniority, status as a former Chief of Army, and dual portfolio as Coordinating Minister for Public Services alongside Defence, his true positioning on the ministerial scale is expected to place him well above this baseline.
This framework explicitly pegs ministerial compensation to the median income of the top 1,000 Singaporean citizen earners, adjusted downward by a 40% public service discount. Every dollar is accounted for transparently, taxed directly, and leaves no room for auxiliary corporate income, private directorships, or post-office commercialization of government titles while serving the state.
From an analytical and economic viewpoint, these structures present distinct governance trade-offs regarding how institutional talent is retained.
The Singapore system views competitive political compensation as a necessary defense mechanism against systemic corruption and talent drain, deliberately competing with private sector banking, law, and corporate leadership to recruit top minds like Minister Chan upfront.
The state pays a premium immediately to guarantee complete focus, insulate its leadership from external commercial influence, and make public administration a viable career choice for elite professionals without imposing a severe financial penalty on their households.
In contrast, the United States pays its top defense official a comparatively modest civil service wage but implicitly relies on a revolving-door model where an official's personal brand equity outside of government heavily subsidizes their public tenure.
While the U.S. system keeps taxpayer-funded political salaries artificially low to ease public scrutiny, it shifts the financial reward to the private sector before and after office, creating an ecosystem heavily dependent on media influence and corporate transition networks. - Gemini.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
- Messages
- 36,595
- Points
- 113
Dun bullshit la
Sg institutionalised form of corruption championed only by pap.
Look at the state of sg you know it works or not lor
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
- Messages
- 9,411
- Points
- 113
gemini.
Peter Brian Hegseth serves as the U.S. Secretary of Defense, having been nominated by President Donald J. Trump and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in January 2025. In his official public capacity heading the Pentagon, his annual compensation is strictly capped under Level I of the Executive Schedule at a flat statutory rate of S338,310 (US250,600), with no performance or national bonuses permitted.
This public salary represents a substantial financial pivot from his prior private-sector career, where public financial disclosures reveal he commanded over S6.75 million (US5+ million) combined across 2023 and 2024 through media contracts, lucrative book advances, and high-profile speaking engagements.
Prior to his cabinet appointment, Hegseth spent a decade at Fox News Network from 2014 to 2024, most notably as a co-host for Fox and Friends Weekend, a role that paid him approximately S3.1 million (US2.3 million) annually over his final two years.
He is also a highly successful author of five books focusing on military culture and conservative politics, including the 2024 bestseller The War on Warriors, which secured an initial signing advance of S469,800 (US348,000) from HarperCollins, and Battle for the American Mind (2022), which generated a S202,500 (US150,000) advance along with subsequent ongoing royalty streams.
Hegseth’s foundational background is rooted in academic elite institutions and extensive military service. He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Politics from Princeton University in 2003, where he served as the publisher and editor-in-chief of The Princeton Tory, and later earned a Master of Public Policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 2013.
Commissioned as an Infantry Officer in the U.S. Army National Guard, Hegseth saw active-duty deployments conducting guard operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, serving as an Infantry Platoon Leader during Operation Iraqi Freedom, and operating as a Senior Counterinsurgency Instructor during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.
His military service earned him numerous decorations, including two Bronze Star Medals, two Army Commendation Medals, a Joint Service Commendation Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert Infantryman Badge.
Following his active combat tours, he transitioned into political advocacy, serving as the Executive Director of Vets for Freedom from 2007 to 2011 to lobby for troop surges in Iraq, and later as the Chief Executive Officer of Concerned Veterans for America from 2012 to 2016, where he championed the restructuring of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Professionally, his certified financial asset disclosures indicate that his private wealth remains securely managed across a Fox News Cash Balance Plan, a SEP IRA, standard checking accounts at U.S. Bank, and structured public exchange-traded funds, including the Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund and the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, which he supplements via previous corporate speaking fees that ranged from S10,100 to S43,200 per event.
Peter Brian Hegseth serves as the U.S. Secretary of Defense, having been nominated by President Donald J. Trump and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in January 2025. In his official public capacity heading the Pentagon, his annual compensation is strictly capped under Level I of the Executive Schedule at a flat statutory rate of S338,310 (US250,600), with no performance or national bonuses permitted.
This public salary represents a substantial financial pivot from his prior private-sector career, where public financial disclosures reveal he commanded over S6.75 million (US5+ million) combined across 2023 and 2024 through media contracts, lucrative book advances, and high-profile speaking engagements.
Prior to his cabinet appointment, Hegseth spent a decade at Fox News Network from 2014 to 2024, most notably as a co-host for Fox and Friends Weekend, a role that paid him approximately S3.1 million (US2.3 million) annually over his final two years.
He is also a highly successful author of five books focusing on military culture and conservative politics, including the 2024 bestseller The War on Warriors, which secured an initial signing advance of S469,800 (US348,000) from HarperCollins, and Battle for the American Mind (2022), which generated a S202,500 (US150,000) advance along with subsequent ongoing royalty streams.
Hegseth’s foundational background is rooted in academic elite institutions and extensive military service. He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Politics from Princeton University in 2003, where he served as the publisher and editor-in-chief of The Princeton Tory, and later earned a Master of Public Policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 2013.
Commissioned as an Infantry Officer in the U.S. Army National Guard, Hegseth saw active-duty deployments conducting guard operations at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, serving as an Infantry Platoon Leader during Operation Iraqi Freedom, and operating as a Senior Counterinsurgency Instructor during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.
His military service earned him numerous decorations, including two Bronze Star Medals, two Army Commendation Medals, a Joint Service Commendation Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert Infantryman Badge.
Following his active combat tours, he transitioned into political advocacy, serving as the Executive Director of Vets for Freedom from 2007 to 2011 to lobby for troop surges in Iraq, and later as the Chief Executive Officer of Concerned Veterans for America from 2012 to 2016, where he championed the restructuring of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Professionally, his certified financial asset disclosures indicate that his private wealth remains securely managed across a Fox News Cash Balance Plan, a SEP IRA, standard checking accounts at U.S. Bank, and structured public exchange-traded funds, including the Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund and the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, which he supplements via previous corporate speaking fees that ranged from S10,100 to S43,200 per event.
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2018
- Messages
- 20,292
- Points
- 113
SAF Maj Gen is equivalent to Sgt worldwide.
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 96,389
- Points
- 113
Pete Hegseth should STFU
And charged for multiple murder of Caribbean boatmen. Two of whom survived murder attempt and taking US to court.
Plus US complicity in Gaza genocide and murder of iranian leaders. And uprovoked attack on Iran.
It is the US that should be leashed.
And charged for multiple murder of Caribbean boatmen. Two of whom survived murder attempt and taking US to court.
Plus US complicity in Gaza genocide and murder of iranian leaders. And uprovoked attack on Iran.
It is the US that should be leashed.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 24,967
- Points
- 113
The S'pore govt specialises in 'laundering' that makes everything 'whiter than white'.
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 25,173
- Points
- 113
Say is clean wage. But ministers some how have sweet heart deals when cum to selling their landed properties...
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2023
- Messages
- 24,967
- Points
- 113
"Whiter than white" sounds like money laundering.Say is clean wage. But ministers some how have sweet heart deals when cum to selling their landed properties...
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2010
- Messages
- 36,595
- Points
- 113
Pete is war hero
CCS is Boy Scout
Pete sexperience two wars, Venezula and onging Iran wars
CCS no war
Similar threads
