- Joined
- Jul 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,463
- Points
- 113
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh313 title="AddThis utility frame" height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh49.html#iit=1313620150041&cb=0&ab=-&dh=www.sammyboy.com&dr=&du=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sammyboy.com%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D2&dt=Rich%20text%20editor%2C%20vB_Editor_001_editor%2C%20press%20ALT%200%20for%20help.&inst=1&lng=en-us&pc=men&pub=ra-4de3727223ff01db&ssl=0&sid=4e4c40b4aff0fe6f&srd=1&srf=0.02&srp=0.2&srx=0.5&ver=250&xck=0&rev=103325&ct=1&xd=1" width=1 name=_atssh313 frameborder="0"></IFRAME>
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh12 title="AddThis utility frame" height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh49.html#iit=1313620084515&cb=0&ab=-&dh=www.sammyboy.com&dr=&du=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sammyboy.com%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D2&dt=Rich text editor%2C vB_Editor_001_editor%2C press ALT 0 for help.&inst=1&lng=en-us&pc=men&pub=ra-4de3727223ff01db&ssl=0&sid=4e4c4073c60a5686&srd=1&srf=0.02&srp=0.2&srx=0.5&ver=250&xck=0&rev=103325&ct=1&xd=1" frameBorder=0 width=1 name=_atssh12></IFRAME>
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh722 title="AddThis utility frame" height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh49.html#iit=1313620016209&cb=0&ab=-&dh=www.sammyboy.com&dr=&du=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sammyboy.com%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D2&dt=Rich text editor%2C vB_Editor_001_editor%2C press ALT 0 for help.&inst=1&lng=en-us&pc=men&pub=ra-4de3727223ff01db&ssl=0&sid=4e4c4030e8b118b9&srd=1&srf=0.02&srp=0.2&srx=0.5&ver=250&xck=0&rev=103325&ct=1&xd=1" frameBorder=0 width=1 name=_atssh722></IFRAME>
Why charge twice for the same sanitation service?
Letter from Chin Kee Thou
04:46 AM Aug 17, 2011
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> var fontIndex = 2; var fontSize = new Array('0.63em', '0.69em', '0.75em', '0.88em', '1em', '1.13em'); </SCRIPT>
SEWAGE disposal has come a long way from the days of the bored hole or pit latrine and the bucket system.
My first encounter with the bored-hole latrine was in the early 1970s, during my National Service. It was not only cheap and efficient, with no disposal fee, but also provided nutrients to the surrounding vegetation.
The bucket system was common then in the city. Night soil carriers were employed and they transported the buckets in specially constructed night soil trucks, with many locked compartments resembling today's safe deposit boxes.
The utility bill would include a removal fee known as night refuse fee.
With urbanisation and development of Singapore's kampungs, we resettled into high-rise flats fitted with toilet bowls. A sanitary appliance fee for disposal of sewage was imposed for each toilet bowl, in replacement of the night refuse fee.
Later on, a waterborne fee was added and stays on to date. Can the authority clarify on the double fee for sanitation service?
Both are fees levied for the same purpose - to offset the cost of treating used water and for the operation and maintenance of the public sewerage system - but charged in two ways, based on the number of sanitary fittings and the volume of water used.
<!-- Related Photo, Media and Articles--><!--End of Related Photo Media and Articles--><!--Facebook--><!--Facebook--><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};</SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4de3727223ff01db"></SCRIPT><!-- AddThis Button END -->
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh12 title="AddThis utility frame" height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh49.html#iit=1313620084515&cb=0&ab=-&dh=www.sammyboy.com&dr=&du=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sammyboy.com%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D2&dt=Rich text editor%2C vB_Editor_001_editor%2C press ALT 0 for help.&inst=1&lng=en-us&pc=men&pub=ra-4de3727223ff01db&ssl=0&sid=4e4c4073c60a5686&srd=1&srf=0.02&srp=0.2&srx=0.5&ver=250&xck=0&rev=103325&ct=1&xd=1" frameBorder=0 width=1 name=_atssh12></IFRAME>
<IFRAME style="Z-INDEX: 100000; POSITION: absolute; BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 1px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 1px; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; TOP: 0px; LEFT: 0px" id=_atssh722 title="AddThis utility frame" height=1 src="//s7.addthis.com/static/r07/sh49.html#iit=1313620016209&cb=0&ab=-&dh=www.sammyboy.com&dr=&du=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sammyboy.com%2Fnewthread.php%3Fdo%3Dpostthread%26f%3D2&dt=Rich text editor%2C vB_Editor_001_editor%2C press ALT 0 for help.&inst=1&lng=en-us&pc=men&pub=ra-4de3727223ff01db&ssl=0&sid=4e4c4030e8b118b9&srd=1&srf=0.02&srp=0.2&srx=0.5&ver=250&xck=0&rev=103325&ct=1&xd=1" frameBorder=0 width=1 name=_atssh722></IFRAME>
Why charge twice for the same sanitation service?
Letter from Chin Kee Thou
04:46 AM Aug 17, 2011
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript> var fontIndex = 2; var fontSize = new Array('0.63em', '0.69em', '0.75em', '0.88em', '1em', '1.13em'); </SCRIPT>
SEWAGE disposal has come a long way from the days of the bored hole or pit latrine and the bucket system.
My first encounter with the bored-hole latrine was in the early 1970s, during my National Service. It was not only cheap and efficient, with no disposal fee, but also provided nutrients to the surrounding vegetation.
The bucket system was common then in the city. Night soil carriers were employed and they transported the buckets in specially constructed night soil trucks, with many locked compartments resembling today's safe deposit boxes.
The utility bill would include a removal fee known as night refuse fee.
With urbanisation and development of Singapore's kampungs, we resettled into high-rise flats fitted with toilet bowls. A sanitary appliance fee for disposal of sewage was imposed for each toilet bowl, in replacement of the night refuse fee.
Later on, a waterborne fee was added and stays on to date. Can the authority clarify on the double fee for sanitation service?
Both are fees levied for the same purpose - to offset the cost of treating used water and for the operation and maintenance of the public sewerage system - but charged in two ways, based on the number of sanitary fittings and the volume of water used.
<!-- Related Photo, Media and Articles--><!--End of Related Photo Media and Articles--><!--Facebook--><!--Facebook--><!-- AddThis Button BEGIN -->
<SCRIPT type=text/javascript>var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};</SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-4de3727223ff01db"></SCRIPT><!-- AddThis Button END -->