• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Pay rise without higher productivity 'dangerous': Traitor PM

But ok to reward useless and greedy ministers millions for betraying the citizens. What amazing logic!


I agree with the PM. He's very astute when it comes to analysing complex issues thanks to his Cambridge education and his intelligence.
 
Leongsam said:
I agree with the PM. He's very astute when it comes to analysing complex issues thanks to his Cambridge education and his intelligence.

What has background to do with it?
 
I agree with PM Lee too.

However, my question is, every year Ministers and Civil Servants have got pay rise. Question is does it comes when proportional productivity?
 
pay rise to a bunch of dumb fuck sinkies is dangerous... should enslave them and wipe them
 
Why are we paying millions to the ministers Without proportionate productivity ?
Knnccb to the MIW !
Knnccb to the 60% !
 
Why are we paying millions to the ministers Without proportionate productivity ?
Knnccb to the MIW !
Knnccb to the 60% !


You are not paying them. They help themselves with the money becaus
Because they know sinkies are ball-less to deal with themm
 
So how does that explain Zorro?
 
jw5 said:
So how does that explain Zorro?

For some strata you don't equate salaries with productivity. You measure the perspiration.
 
Fare rise without higher productivity 'dangerous', applies to our subway too?
 
I agree with PM Lee too.

However, my question is, every year Ministers and Civil Servants have got pay rise. Question is does it comes when proportional productivity?

Depending on how you look at it, answer to that question is actually yes. Higher GDP every year, same number of ministar
 
Productivity? Since when has Lim Swee Say and Lim Boon Heng or a whole bunch of obscenely paid PAP has brought Singapore productivity to the next level? With ministers overpaying themselves without leading the productivity move how can they lecture Singaporeans who are grossly underpaid. Fuck PAP #!#$%^&*(!!!!!!
 
It is hard to increase productivity if we keep hiring cheap FW/FT from third world countries.
 
you are right on this one, and yes 60pc of sinkees are balls less

It is easier to fuck FT in your company if you have confident and flair of a superior beings. I just told an FT in my company either he perform his work with utmost standard or fuck off from the companies. Though my boss love cheap foreigners, but my words towards the FT send my boss to cloud nine. Next day, all these "FT" shrank whenever they saw me walking into the office with "an air". Give them the feelings that you don't play politics, but by the rules of upholding standards, and no FT is indispensible. I tell you, they will suck up to you in no time by calling you "yes sir", "yes madam"...you guess the nationality.
 
Last edited:
It makes no sense to increase productivity when wages are already artificially depressed.

To increase productivity would be to work for free.

In other words, become a slave.

And there's no point working so hard when they plan to discard you once you've outlived your usefulness.
Remember Boxer of Animal Farm.

boxer%20animal%20farm.jpg
 
I tell you, they will suck up to you in no time by calling you "yes sir", "yes madam"...you guess the nationality.

From my various friends' anecdotes, Pinoys and subcontinental Indians are the worst porlumpars. Their overtly ingratiating behavior would make even the most hardcore PAP grassroots volunteer blush in embarrassment.

Yes, exceptions to the norms exist. But that is why stereotypes exist: a fairly accurate assessment of certain trends inferred from previous experiences, so as to save you time and trouble from figuring people out individually.
 
i bet in a few years time your boss will replace you with cheaper FT. Just a matter of time.
 
i bet in a few years time your boss will replace you with cheaper FT. Just a matter of time.

By then, I will command heaven and hell in the companies under my ransom. Try and sack me if you dare and see what hell I can turn your company into and create an ambience that the boss himself will call quit. This is call dragging down the boat if you push me into the sea. Of course I don't encourage people to do that, but if you are innocent and have contributed substantially and responsibly and yet being ill-treated in this way in favour of FT (especially if your boss if FT), you should know your rights to do what is right.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top