Serious PAP MOE Good Minister Ye Kung Issues POFMA Against Oppie Fat Fuck Lim Tean For Lying! Stop Telling Lies, Lim Tean!!!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
36,768
Points
113
wlib50.jpg


SINGAPORE - Opposition politician and lawyer Lim Tean was asked by the Ministry of Education on Monday (Dec 16) to correct a post on his Facebook page, which the ministry says had implied that the Government was spending more on foreign students than Singapore students.

The Government's fact-checking website Factually on Monday (Dec 16) cited two of Mr Lim's statements: “the total pot available to Singaporean students [is] $167 million compared to the $238 million that is spent on foreign students” and “PAP spends $167 million on Grants & Bursaries for Singaporeans, but $238 million on foreign students??”.

It said that the statements imply that the Education Ministry spends less on Singaporean students than on foreign students and called the statements false and misleading.

Education Minister Ong Ye Kung has asked the Protection from Falsehoods and Manipulation Act office to issue the correction directions to Mr Lim, who is the People's Voice party chief.

Factually website said: "The Ministry of Education’s annual budget is $13 billion, almost all of which is spent on Singapore citizens. The $167 million cited by Mr Lim refers only to bursaries for Singaporean tertiary students, and grossly understates MOE’s total spending on Singaporean citizens for education."

The figures of $167 million and $238 million are not comparable, the Government said.


"The more appropriate comparison should be nearly $13 billion spent on Singaporean students to provide subsidised education for all Singaporean students at all levels, as against the $238 million attributed to foreign students referred to by Mr Lim Tean, which is less than 2 per cent of the total education budget," the Government added.

It noted that much of MOE’s budget goes towards costs to provide education for Singaporean students, such as infrastructure, facilities, laboratories, faculty and teachers, which are either fixed or non-variable costs up to the medium term. "A large part of the $238 million attributed to foreign students comprises these fixed and non-variable costs that we have to incur anyway, whether or not we admit a small proportion of foreign students (currently 5 per cent) in the system."

The correction direction requires Mr Lim to carry, in full, a correction notice at the top of both Facebook posts.

Mr Lim was secretary-general of the National Solidarity Party between 2015 and 2017 before founding People's Voice.

When contacted, he described the Government's response as "absurd" and said that he was considering his legal options.

He said: "Anyone who read my post and the series of posts I made on this subject last week would have been under no mistaken impression that I was discussing the amount of money spent on grants and scholarships and not the overall spending on all Singaporean students.

"It is clear to me that Pofma is being used by this Government ahead of the upcoming general election to silence its opponents and chill public discussion of unpopular government policies."

This is the fourth time the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (Pofma) has been used since it came into force on Oct 2.

On Saturday, Manpower Minister Josephine Teo issued correction directions to two Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Facebook posts and an online article alleging that more local professionals, managers, executives and technicians were being retrenched due to foreign competition.

SDP put up the correction notes on Sunday but also posted an online letter citing news sources that it claims back up its allegations. It has also said it will apply to cancel the correction directions.

In November, Minister for Finance Heng Swee Keat asked opposition party member Brad Bowyer to put up a correction notice on his Facebook post which accused the Government of making bad investment decisions through Temasek and GIC. Mr Bowyer complied.

In another incident last month, Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam directed website States Times Review to attach the Government’s correction notice after the website said a person was arrested in an incident involving a spoof student union Facebook page referring to People’s Action Party member Rachel Ong’s alleged religious affiliations.

After Mr Alex Tan Zhi Xiang, the States Times Review editor, refused to do so, the Government issued the directive to Facebook instead, which later complied by putting up the note – “Facebook is legally required to tell you that the Singapore Government says this post has false information.”

https://www.straitstimes.com/politi...ions-alongside-facebook-posts-on-moe-spending
 
Why are we spending $238m on foreign students? This $238m should be used on Singaporeans, not foreigners. Even $1m spent on foreign students is not acceptable. Why should such a BIG SUM of Singapore's money be spent on foreign people instead of Singaporeans?
 
just curious how much all Foreign Students
contribute to our GDP ?
 
POFMA is something not even George Orwell dreamt of for 1984.
 
It's disappointing how oppies and samsters buy lim tean's lies so easily without doing any fact checking.
 
I think Everyday u wake up sure got one minister issue POFMA to someone .
Pride of PAP !
 
For the record, Lim Tean is not fat. Perhaps a little bit on the plump side. :biggrin:
 
how can you take the entire MOE annual budget and compare against the amount spent on foreign students, of course look good lah......the entire budget includes payroll, maintenance, admin etc etc....these are all used for the foreigners as well as long as MOE is "sponsoring" their stay here...
 
Make POFMA your bitch today!

Since pap likes to hide behind a cloud of ambiguity by publishing abstract figures such as:
https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2019/12/17/roy-ngerng-questions-moes-non-transparency-on-bursaries/
MOE claims: “$238M [is] attributed to foreign students” and “$167M … refers only to bursaries for Singaporean tertiary students”.

1. What is the amount of bursaries for other Singaporean non-tertiary students?
2. Why didn’t the PAP government provide this figure in its so-called clarification?
3. Do these “foreign students” get bursaries too?
4. How much bursaries do they get?
5. And what other forms of funding do they receive?

The MOE says that “$167M and $238M are therefore not comparable”, then why not provide comparable figures?

Let's say Lim Tean publish a set of MOE's bursaries, scholarships, and tuition grants breakdown figures that is derived from his own assumption.
Under POFMA, MOE have to correct those breakdown figures to show the "true" facts thus providing the micro details of where these funds goes to.


Don't play by pap abstract and ambiguous rules of just providing an ambiguous amounts without any details breakdown of these big figures.

Want to know a state secret?
Lim Tean could also publish hoching salary as sgd $300k per day since it's a state secret, hoching salary could only be derived through his own assumption.
Under POFMA, pap have to correct this with hoching salary. No more state secret.

Why pap dare not POFMA Philip Ang?

https://likedatosocanmeh.wordpress.com/

Philip Ang don't play by pap rules, he publications is done with thorough research and pap's abstract and ambiguous figures are broken down with details.
If pap POFMA Philip Ang, then pap have to provide all the details and figures of pap's abstract and ambiguous publications with the "true facts".
Play pap at their own game.

Just come up with your own breakdown figures derived through his own assumption and let POFMA fill in the "true" figures for you.

Make POFMA your bitch today!
 
Back
Top