Got pic of this fucktard lackey dog?
Post and shame him and his family publicly
The issue is CSJ has been proven to b dishonest. As pap has won defamation suits against him. So with such a 'history' csj has little hope of winning.
In response, Mr Foo noted that the real wages of low-income Singaporeans have grown by 10 per cent in the past decade, "unlike the stagnation often seen elsewhere".
Both Chee and Foo are entitled to express opinions. Everyone has a different opinion of how the Singapore system generally scores. Unless Chee is going into specifics, unless he claims Singapore only has one hospital and one polytechnic, you are free to disagree but not label with words like "dishonest".
Even if you go into specifics, you cannot absolve from general descriptions unless your specifics cover all topics. Foo only tackled housing and GLCs. Did he talk about the overcrowded trains caused by privatisation of transport companies which was a failure of the transport system? Did he talk about shortage of hospital beds which is a failure from privatising healthcare?
why PAP does not file defamation against dr chee soon juan?
if no defamation is filed, I belive Dr Chee Soon Juan article in WSJ is true and factual
Highly educated dog.
All the education to learn how to wag his tail and bark.
The issue is CSJ has been proven to b dishonest. As pap has won defamation suits against him. So with such a 'history' csj has little hope of winning.
Only sinkieland diplomats are use for domestic politics. Where on earth do u see US ambassador overseas writing an article to refute a republican politician?
1 percent increase annually ...that is less than inflation. And the Fool is shouting proudly! This fool is a $68-million man. The next WP government should strip all these PAP sycophants of their pension.
For info., pic as shown below:
![]()
![]()
I just want to point out that having a HDB flat while servicing a 30 year loan cannot be classified as home ownership. By virtue of the loan, the bank owns the flat until it is paid up.
This argument is arbitary because even if you hold the title deed, you still don't own it.
If the property, meaning title deed is in your name, you own it. If this was not the case, the banks cannot go after you for delinquent payments. The bank has claim on the property you own through a collateral known as the mortgage. The bank does not own the property. The only time they do own it is when they foreclose on you and take possession. But they always try to avoid that if possible. They are not in the property management business. Therefore the loan does not entitle the bank to ownership.
crony's words not believable
His is a disgrace to the Hainanese clan...u don't believe ask another Hainanese...Ngiam Tong Dow...
/QUOTE]
Why NTD? Just ask the greatest Hainanese in S'pore - GMS.