great and deserving leaders resolve conflicts by talking and solving issues with other leaders in private (without involving everybody else and the public), not go on mainstream media to rile up all to stand “united” with them smelling their farts and badbreath. if they can’t resolve issues of national importance mano a mano without going pubic, how can they leave “face” room for other leaders to negotiate and react? by going pubic without working it out face to face, how are they going to justify their constant pubic rattling and rants in ongoing and future issues? do they mean everytime there’s a national or international issue, talk to press and shitizens and ask for support, sympathy, solutions and ideas before having some guts, putting neck on the line, getting on the phone and talking directly to other parties? or do they simply send emails (of protest) with the usual bureaucratic and clerical templates. if like that, may as well pay them as clerks, and not as multi-million dollar ministars.
