• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP begging employers for scraps for Sinkies...

garlic

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
3,521
Points
113
"The government has warned foreign managers that they should not marginalise qualified local candidates in order to hire and promote their own kind.

Minister of State for Manpower Tan Chuan-Jin announced on Monday new guidelines targeting discriminatory practices against Singaporeans such as job advertisements indicating that foreigners are preferred and the preferential hiring of foreigners over suitable Singaporeans.

These new guidelines were drawn up in response to the high number of cases -- 51 in the first nine months of this year -- of unfair treatment based on nationality lodged with the Tripartite Alliance for Fair Employment Practices (Tafep), reported The Straits Times.

Here are three case studies on why Singaporeans are lodging complaints of preferential treatment:
Case study 1: Foreigners hire fellow countrymen - A Singaporean complains that a foreign manager in her IT firm prefers his own countrymen to qualified Singaporeans. Management tells Tafep that it had trouble finding suitable local candidates, but later admits some departments have seen an increased representation from a particular country in recent years. Company then agrees to hire and develop Singaporeans as its workforce core.
Case study 2: Discriminatory practices by an employment agency - An employment agency specialising in foreign recruitment raves about why foreign workers are better than Singaporeans in an e-mail to clients. The agency corrects its e-mail and pledges not to do so again after Tafep steps in. Manager involved is counselled and makes a public apology while staff are sent for relevant training. Manpower Ministry issues a written warning to the agency after conducting its own investigations.
Case study 3: Over-reliance on foreigners - A chief executive was swamped by complaints from his local staff about the company hiring too many foreigners from a certain country. CEO was surprised of this practice as he was not aware of it. Many employees left for another company which hired less foreigners.
Tan, who was speaking at a tripartism forum, stressed that while foreigners are still welcome to work in Singapore, the core of a company's workforce must remain Singaporean.

The Member of Parliament for Marine Parade group representation constituency said that even though the government is tightening its grip on importing foreign labour, employers on the ground must still be watchful over their actions as many Singaporeans have expressed displeasure over discriminatory practices in their workplace.

“Let me emphasise that discriminatory practices have no place in Singapore,” he said. He added that companies have a responsibility “to attract, recruit and develop Singaporeans so that Singaporeans remain at the core of our workforce”.

When asked why laws were not drawn to fight discrimination, Tan replied that this issue isn’t straightforward. He said that employers’ mindsets must be changed to tackle the problem, and it’s better done through moral suasion.

He added that anti-discrimination laws would reduce flexibility in the labour market, which is a strength for Singapore, the same paper reported.

Tan, however, assured that the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) will act against employers who refuse to eliminate discrimination.

MOM will work with consult employers to resolve issues, but if that doesn’t work, the ministry will have to use other methods, such as slapping demerit points on employment agencies.

In addition, Tafep will hold workshops to educate employers and ease them into the new guidelines.

Labour chief Lim Swee Say and employers’ group chief Stephen Lee both support the new guidelines.

Lee, president of the Singapore National Employers Federation, said that firms having Singaporeans as their workforce core enforces their competitiveness in the long-term as foreign workers tend to be more mobile.

He also pointed that Singapore’s foreign worker cap, which stands at one-third of the three-million-strong workforce, is one of the world’s highest. Lee also said that companies must nurture Singaporeans as their core.

“If you replace your core with all foreigners because of short-term expediency, then I start to question the viability of the company in the long run,” Lee said.

Lim, NTUC secretary-general, said that employers need to change their mindsets. Some employers don’t think Singaporeans are willing to take on low-level jobs, while not possessing the ability to take on high-skilled ones.

Many Singaporeans also complain that employers are not willing to pay better for low-level jobs, while not doing enough to help them move up to higher-level ones."


http://sg.news.yahoo.com/don-t-hire--promote-at-expense-of-s-poreans--govt-to-foreign-managers.html
 
a bit too late....many ft employers have already done what they are doing...their own kind....singaporeans seeking jobs in their own turf....terrible....it must be a big problem for a leader to come out in the open to say such a thing....how long have singaporeans been suffering in silence....suffering suffering suffering....limkopi no job no income no nothing...just fart here and fart there.....
 
"When asked why laws were not drawn to fight discrimination, Tan replied that this issue isn’t straightforward. He said that employers’ mindsets must be changed to tackle the problem, and it’s better done through moral suasion.

He added that anti-discrimination laws would reduce flexibility in the labour market, which is a strength for Singapore, the same paper reported."

this is the root of the problem - no laws - guidelines are just that, meant as a guide only.
 
another obvious example of the PAP being locked away in their ivory towers. this forum has been discussing the non-resident indian invasion of the workplace for a long time. only now then they wake up their idea.

finally, we will see a reduction in the numer of NRIs - nuisance retarded (india) indians.

peace to all local singaporean indians. these comments are in no way directed at you.
 
Will Singaporean work for FT Ah Neh boss with most of them Ah Neh?
I doubt so ............Sinkie will resign in few month or worst 1st day after fine out all are Ah Neh next day dont turn up for work.
 
this a serious matter which should be addressed with great care and expediency. nanbeh ft employers get fts ...leaving the singaporeans in the cold....cleaning toilets and washing plates....sad boh.
 
"When asked why laws were not drawn to fight discrimination, Tan replied that this issue isn’t straightforward. He said that employers’ mindsets must be changed to tackle the problem, and it’s better done through moral suasion.

He added that anti-discrimination laws would reduce flexibility in the labour market, which is a strength for Singapore, the same paper reported."

this is the root of the problem - no laws - guidelines are just that, meant as a guide only.

Dear Frens, just my 2 cents, since the PAP has come out with such a statement..WP should hold them to account. And we in the internet community must constantly remind the PAP too. For example, when another case of discrimination surfaces, bring it up to the PAP,,,make them work for it, constantly put them on the defensive.

I realise that the PAP very weak in its arguments. WP MPs has put all the PAP on the defensive and they are reacting to the situation. PAP cant argue their way out, they are not worth the millions paid to them...as long as we continue just highlighting the facts,,PAP will continue to be on the defensive. That way 2016 will be a real watershed election
 
Too late....too little....and ineffective. 60% must be damn happy about the situation. :)
 
60% couldn't care less about the cogency of opposition's arguments.
 
When asked why laws were not drawn to fight discrimination, Tan replied that this issue isn’t straightforward. He said that employers’ mindsets must be changed to tackle the problem, and it’s better done through moral suasion.

everything is just for show ...u believe that singapore goverment really care ?
 
Lol, Sinkies must be really dense if they believe such hot air when the gates have been thrown open and hordes of the enemy are streaming through the gates every second.

The issue right now is to close the gates before doing anything else but even doing this now is way too late. The damage has been done and Sinkandpoor no longer belongs to Sinkies.
 
Dear Frens, just my 2 cents, since the PAP has come out with such a statement..WP should hold them to account. And we in the internet community must constantly remind the PAP too. For example, when another case of discrimination surfaces, bring it up to the PAP,,,make them work for it, constantly put them on the defensive.

I realise that the PAP very weak in its arguments. WP MPs has put all the PAP on the defensive and they are reacting to the situation. PAP cant argue their way out, they are not worth the millions paid to them...as long as we continue just highlighting the facts,,PAP will continue to be on the defensive. That way 2016 will be a real watershed election

That is why LTK's "co-driver" analogy is always right. The co-driver is there to slap and wake up the driver if he should fall asleep whilst on the wheels. And the fucking PAP had been sleeping for way too long because their mentality is "why work so much when we are already the highest paid ministers in this planet?"
 
Last edited:
The issue right now is to close the gates before doing anything else but even doing this now is way too late. The damage has been done and Sinkandpoor no longer belongs to Sinkies.

we're so screwed!!! WTF is NS for?
bro madmansg's mantra must be shared once again: NS IS KILLING SG!
 
lianbeng replies to thread, "papayas can simply sack those employers n close down their businesses mah.":mad:
 
hehehe... sinkies are like that.... so what.. sinkies' ball-lessness screwed themselves. totally deserve it sinkies...
 
There are many more Chinese from Malaysia and PRC here than from any other race. Why are they not releasing FT statistics by race and country?
 
lianbeng replies to thread, "papayas can simply sack those employers n close down their businesses mah.":mad:

Exactly. This is just an act by the scum in white to hoodwink Sinkies into believing that their welfare comes first. Sadly, the majority of Sinkies are functional retards who will just fall for it.
 
Back
Top