• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Outstanding Piece on Singapore by Lucky Tan

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
25,134
Points
83
Captures the essence of what this country is facing under this Govt.



Diary of A Singaporean Mind

Wednesday, January 02, 2013
Happy New Year : What 2013 may bring...
The year 2011 ended with a dramatic breakdown of our MRT system that woke everyone up to the urgent need to improve our public transport. On the last day of 2012, I took the circle line and was delayed for more than half an hour in the morning due to a "track fault". In the afternoon, there was a problem with the EW line when a breakdown occurred at Redhill MRT[Link]. On the same day, there was also a disruption on the NEL - what a way to end the year. I wrote about the problems with our transport system 6 years ago, identifying the privatisation of our public transport and the pressure for profit to please shareholders as factors that will lead to decline in service quality. Unless we can change the model, we will not see the dramatic improvement of service quality needed to lift the quality of life of most Singaporeans - with rising COE and more middleclass Singaporeans forced to take public transport, there will be rising dissatisfaction over unmet expectations The problems with our public transport system is perhaps emblematic of the socio-economic issues faced by Singapore in the recent and coming years. Our old solutions to problems become new problems and we find ourselves unable to solve the new class of problems because we applied old solutions for too long ignoring the deep and far reaching negative consequences.

“The problem with Singapore is that suddenly, we became a one-trick pony......Our one trick was bring in more cheap foreign labour; we will increase GDP every year. And that is true, but it’s not the only trick in the book — (yet) it became so convenient for us that we used it all the time.” - AWARE executive director Corinna Lim.[Link]

This year ended with Singapore nearly entering recession. Our growth has stagnated because of our high dependence on cheap foreign labour for growth . The govt introduced mild curbs to foreign imported labor but our economy needs high level of foreign imported labor to to keep our economy growing because we are "out of new tricks". The busineess community in the form of Singapore International Chamber of Commerce (SICC) and Singapore European Chamber of Commerce (SECC), claimed that Singapore will "lose its competive edge" unless the floodgates are again re-opened. The business lobby wants more of the old solution and to play the same one easy trick. No where else in the developed world do businesses enjoy such a liberal foreign worker policy yet the business lobby demands the floodgates stay open[Link]. The interests of the business lobby are not just narrow, they are short term in nature. In 2012, Singapore's economy was showing signs of overheating with inflation hitting 5.7% in Nov 2012[Link], business rentals, housing prices and COE breaking new records. If the Singapore had done what the business lobby wanted easing the curbs on foreign labor, we would have even higher inflation and the type of GDP growth that brings little benefit, if not negative effects, for ordinary Singaporeans.

In 2010, minimum wage [Link] was proposed as solutions for our income inequality and low wage worker problem. This was quickly rejected by the govt, govt-controlled union and the business lobby. Their claim was such schemes would lead to unemployment and it is undesirable to interfere with the free market. A pro-business govt with controlled unions and a business community just cannot get some of these bold but workable ideas through to solve a problem that will polarize our society and threaten us in the longer term. In 2011, the Hong Kong govt decided to adopt minimum wage legislation - the pro-business lobby there screamed that thousands of businesses would shut down, unemployment would rise, inflation would spin out of control and Hong Kong would become uncompetitive. The Hong Kong govt fortunately had enough resolve to overcome the resistance from the business lobby and boldly implemented the measure. The legislation pushed the wages of lowest paid workers by a whopping 28%. One year after implementation none of the deleterious effects has been seen - unemployment remained the same, inflation rate is lower than Singapore's and the Hong Kong economy kept growing. Economists generally conclude that the implementation is a success[Link]and the Hong Kong govt intends to increase minimum wage by another 7% in May next year[Hong Kong increases min wage] benefiting 320,000 workers.

There has been little progress in tackling the income gap which in now near dangerous levels[Link]. This year our GINI index (after govt transfers) did not improve from 2011 [Link]. Despite all the govt publicity surrounding GST vouchers, Workfare, U-Save etc, these transfers knock off only 0.02 from our GINI index which remains 0.452 after transfers (0.473 before transfers). Some countries reduce their GINI by 0.1 to 0.2 through govt transfers[Link]. Although the income gap did not get worse, maintaining it at these levels has harmful long term effects including increased poverty and allowing the growth of an permanent underclass to take hold. The govt limit what it does today to face the consequences of its inaction further down - the problem will become harder and more expensive to solve.

The issue is not whether we can solve any of these problems quickly - they have become entrenched and difficult - but Singaporeans need to know we can get on the right path. But 2012 is another year the PAP govt demonstrated that it cannot change fast enough to overcome the problems we face. The ideological shackles, the old formulas and the hard truths of one man, keeps the govt on a narrow path afraid to walk an alternate track on which solutions might lie. We are in a system that cause our people to be the unhappiest in the world[Singaporeans the unhappiest people in the world] yet the PAP govt is still trying to make do small tweaks and still constantly preach to us that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the system they have constructed. ..but the reality is we have the most unhappy people in the world who have been dis-empowered by a ruling elite whose interests over time have diverged from that of the common folks...how can it be that no major change is needed to address this?

The PAP today still uses propaganda, filters information and uses a considerable amount of spin to keep Singaporeans in a bubble of ignorance and acceptance of their system. But with alternate sources of information, more Singaporeans realize the flaws and unsustainability of the current system. 2013 like 2012 will see more Singaporeans turning against the system that is generating negative outcomes in the quality of life for an increasing number of people. Nothing improved in key areas that affected our quality of life in 2012 - housing became less affordable, COE for cars are at record levels, public transport saw no improvement, cost of healthcare kept rising and inflation is in excess of 5%. There is rising indebtedness in our society with consumer loans increasing 34% from $151.5 to $201.4 billion from 2010 to October 2012 since I last wrote about it [Link], and loan sharking has become epidemic in recent years with more than 65,000 cases in the last 4 years. Singaporeans have the highest debt to income ratio in the world[Personal Debt Bomb].

After 2012, it is hard to be optimistic that the PAP govt will eventually be able to acquire a brave vision to lead us out of our problems and improve the quality of life of Singaporeans. The close link between the PAP and the network of businesses that form our GLCs has resulted in interests that diverged from those of ordinary Singaporeans. Policies have been unbalanced for many years will continue to remain unbalanced until Singaporeans acquire real power to effect changes in the system.
 
Mr Lucky Tan can be our President, also a 'Tan' :o:o:o
 
The PAP needs to be put out of existence. A split in the party will happen as the new fights the old.
 
Last edited:
Technically, it is reported Singapore is not in recession, but in reality, the economy is slipping into recession and the govt is not doing anything concrete to prevent it, just paying lip-service and raising taxes to take care of its revenue coffers but no wise and far-sighted vision is coming out of parliament nowadays to solve the following issues: healthcare costs, utility costs, transport costs, housing costs, employment, old age, etc, etc...

SIGH!
 
In 2010, minimum wage [Link] was proposed as solutions for our income inequality and low wage worker problem. This was quickly rejected by the govt, govt-controlled union and the business lobby. Their claim was such schemes would lead to unemployment and it is undesirable to interfere with the free market.

Why is the govt so against minimum wage? This is puzzling indeed.
 
Why is the govt so against minimum wage? This is puzzling indeed.
Could be something to do with maid salaries. How to legislate and yet leave out the maids? The entire sinkieland will have uproar against paying the maids more. We are talking about many sinkie employers who make a big fuss about give weekly day off to maids.
 
Could be something to do with maid salaries. How to legislate and yet leave out the maids? The entire sinkieland will have uproar against paying the maids more. We are talking about many sinkie employers who make a big fuss about give weekly day off to maids.
They probably see the problems in Taiwan which has problems with foreigner worker with the min wage.
 
Thanks for the article scroobal, how are you? My take on the issue. There are no strong UNION in Singapore plus the fact that Singaporean are a docile bunch of sheep. I've come to realised that the union movement is really a necessary evil that is needed to counter the big businesses. Singapore has become a big corporation. Talks about workers welfare, equality, "meritocracy", flies off in the eyes of business. Why should someone pay more for work, in terms of workers benefits if you can squeeze that extra more for yourself? Businesses will always exist in our economic structure, unions need to be there to protect workers. Unless there are no longer any need for businesses then we can talk about not needed unions.

PS: found out recently that the word "meritocracy" seems to be a Uniquely Singapore thing.
 
PS: found out recently that the word "meritocracy" seems to be a Uniquely Singapore thing.


This is from wiki. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritocracy

Although the concept has existed for centuries, the term meritocracy was first coined by British politician and sociologist, Michael Young in his 1958 satirical essay,[3][15][16][17][18] In this book the term had distinctly negative connotations as Young questioned both the legitimacy of the selection process used to become a member of this elite and the outcomes of being ruled by such a narrowly defined group.

"The Rise of the Meritocracy", which pictured the United Kingdom under the rule of a government favoring intelligence and aptitude (merit) above all else. The essay, written in the first-person by a fictional historical narrator in 2034, interweaves history from the politics of pre- and post-war Britain with those of fictional future events in the short (1960 onward) and long term (2020 onward).[19]

The essay was based upon the tendency of the then-current governments, in their striving toward intelligence, to ignore shortcomings and upon the failure of education systems to utilize correctly the gifted and talented members within their societies.[20]

Young's fictional narrator explains that, on the one hand, the greatest contributor to society is not the "stolid mass" or majority, but the "creative minority" or members of the "restless elite".[21] On the other hand, he claims that there are casualties of progress whose influence is underestimated and that, from such stolid adherence to natural science and intelligence, arises arrogance and complacency.[21] This problem is encapsulated in the phrase "Every selection of one is a rejection of many".[21]
 
Lucky is right. The standards of governance have fallen, the state stewardship is below par. Many Ministers and MPs in the govt are not the calibre that should be commanding millions of dollars in salary.

The flood of foreign cheap labour is blamed on Singaporeans not replacing themselves. yet nothing is done about the astronomical costs of housingso that young couples can have a roof quickly and affordably for setting up a family, the cost of living and inflation have outstripped earning powers of everybody except Ministers and those safely ensconced in GLCs, and businessmen who have cronies in the power elite, transport management systems are in disarray, the PM has a habit of hiding away somewhere when trouble arises, Ministries are manned by incompetent Ministers., TCs run by dirty politicians etc. legit demands for answers to AIM are theratened with defamation suits...

Basically, under the inept PAP, this country is going to the dogs.
 
Yes and under meritocratic states further down, you will see only Singapore in it. Makes you wonder that the idea is actually from a fictional book and we are all living in a fake society to begin with.
The most outstanding was by Ms Catherine Lim,made 373 days ago,God bless,amen
PAP incapable of reinventing itself: Catherine Lim
Yahoo! NewsroomBy Fann Sim | Yahoo! Newsroom – Sat, Jan 14, 2012
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/pap-is-inca...erine-lim.html
C.Lim predicted it one year ago,373 days to be exact,God bless,amen
 
Link doesn't work. But if you mean Singapore is a fake society. I've got the same feeling when I watched the Matrix like 10 years back. We live in pods, pidgeon hole, The many trees, garder city you see are all man-made, transplanted. We live under an authoritarian rule under one party. People that dissent against it are sued etc.

The most outstanding was by Ms Catherine Lim,made 373 days ago,God bless,amen
PAP incapable of reinventing itself: Catherine Lim
Yahoo! NewsroomBy Fann Sim | Yahoo! Newsroom – Sat, Jan 14, 2012
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/pap-is-inca...erine-lim.html
C.Lim predicted it one year ago,373 days to be exact,God bless,amen
 
Back
Top