- Joined
- Jul 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,580
- Points
- 0
Racism in the institutional sense is always ascribed to the majority race or the race in power. So in Singapore, the Chinese are racist. In Malaysia, the bumiputra policy can be deemed racist. In South Africa under apartheid, even though the whites were the minority, they were the ones wielding power, so perpetrators of racism there must be white.
It's meaningless to talk about black racism in the US or Malay racism in Singapore or Paki racism in the UK.
That's racism for a reason if you want to call it that. Mudland is next to singapore. Mudland's majority are malays. It then shows that some malays or who knows majority of malays might help them.
I want ppl to be more discerning when talking about racism here. The context of racism here is much much better than other countries. In US for eg whites are pissed off with blacks asking for some help even though they made them slaves before. They said that's a long time ago (just around 100+ yrs) get over it. Only in this country do we see minorities making a big hoo haa over every small slight whether it's perceived or real.
That's why in bigger forums say hwz for eg you can write a few harmless things about malays like they are drug addicts which is quite true and they can actually make a police report over that. Small stupid things like this and ppl get offended on it and it's one-sided and so how the blame always falls on chinese ppl being racists when they never commit violent acts but just write harmless things on the net or didn't smile at him in the shop for eg.