• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Oppie Leung Really Xia Suay All Oppies! Going To Apologise To PAP Tmrw For Spreading Lies About Ridout Case!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset

SINGAPORE - Leader of the House Indranee Rajah has sought an apology from Progress Singapore Party (PSP) secretary-general Leong Mun Wai and asked him to remove a video posted on his party’s Facebook page, saying it gave a false and misleading impression that the Ridout Road issue was not fully aired in Parliament.

Speaking in Parliament on Wednesday, she said the video also gave the impression that Mr Leong was not allowed to ask questions after the House heard ministerial statements on Monday on the rental of two black-and-white state bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road by Law Minister K. Shanmugam and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.

The video, posted at around midnight on Tuesday, started with clips of exchanges between Mr Leong, who is a Non-Constituency MP, asking questions on the Ridout Road issue, before showing an exchange between him and Deputy Speaker Christopher de Souza.

Mr Leong had asked Mr de Souza to “not end the debate early because it is an important topic... All Singaporeans are watching this debate”. Mr de Souza’s response was that the Speaker decides when to end the session, and based on parliamentary procedure, the House does not debate ministerial statements, though MPs can ask for clarifications.

The video was accompanied by the caption: “What some online commenters are calling another ‘sia suay’ (embarrassing) moment. The PSP’s Leong Mun Wai and Hazel Poa are here to do whatever it takes to ensure that the voice of people is heard.”

Ms Indranee said the video “gives a false impression that issues on the Ridout matter could not be fully ventilated because Mr Deputy Speaker would not allow a debate despite a plea by Mr Leong for this to happen”.

It did not reflect that questions were put to the ministers, who were held to account and did respond, she added, in raising a point of order during Wednesday’s sitting. Any MP can raise a point of order to bring a breach of order or Parliament rules to the Speaker’s attention.

Ms Indranee noted that the debate had gone on for almost five hours at the point of the exchange between Mr Leong and Mr de Souza.

The whole issue was discussed in Parliament for six hours, with two hours of ministerial statements from four ministers and clarifications taking up 3 hours 48 minutes, she added.

She pointed out that in total, Mr Leong asked 11 questions during the session and Mr de Souza had given him multiple opportunities to do so.

Ms Indranee reminded MPs that they are obliged to uphold proper conduct in and out of Parliament under the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act.

She noted that Mr Leong had breached parliamentary rules on multiple occasions, from 2021 to as recent as March 2023.

In response, Mr Leong said the “sia suay” comment in the Facebook post was referring to himself, and not Mr de Souza.

“My communications department, specifically, is using a past example about people calling me ‘sia suay’, so this (phrase) is... referring to another instance that some people online may think that it is ‘sia suay’,” he said.

The video put up by his party was “just an expression”, Mr Leong added. “In this country, we’re still supposed to have free expression.”


To that, Ms Indranee said that while there is free expression in Singapore, it “has never extended to falsehoods, scandalously defaming somebody or misrepresenting situations or facts or misrepresenting what happened in Parliament”.

She asked Mr Leong to respond to her request for an apology to Parliament and removal of the Facebook post by Thursday.

Mr Leong said he would discuss the matter with his party and give a formal response as soon as possible.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ise-remove-sia-suay-video-on-ridout-road-saga
 

in3deep

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looks like Indranee really wants LMW to suck her cock. She accepts that the xiaxuay refers to LMW but still wants him to apologize to parliament,
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Looks like Indranee really wants LMW to suck her cock. She accepts that the xiaxuay refers to LMW but still wants him to apologize to parliament,

Nothing wrong with humiliating oppies on national tv when they don't know how to behave themselves in Parliament.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looks like Indranee really wants LMW to suck her cock. She accepts that the xiaxuay refers to LMW but still wants him to apologize to parliament,
Lucky she did not use her tua liap nee to smack ah leong face. 555
 
Last edited:

Balls2U

Alfrescian
Loyal
No point engaging in all these theatrics to put LMW down. It'll only pissed off the lower class Sinkies and incur their wrath at the next GE.
 

oliverlee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Fantastic to see how these fuckers self destruct. Keep making ppl like LMW the strawmen and you fuck yourself deep deep. You have lost at least a third of the population, who are the hard core blue collar workers. All your Mediacorp 8 / Suria / Vasantham propaganda will not save you from now on
 

millim6868

Alfrescian
Loyal
Lol, dirty laundry, the snakes also ask sinkies wat they want eat at hawker,restaurant lol,now they ate caught pants down, conflict of interests , corrupted they are renting at s fucking low rent taking advantage of it ,they like big landed,whetelse ask sinkies stay at pigeon holes,lol
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Tables turned. Dualupnee gonna apologise on behalf of PAP to Leung come Tuesday for loose mouth ex TCJ. And Leung will all guns firing on Iswaran and TCJ loose cock and CLH loose pussy.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Tables turned. Dualupnee gonna apologise on behalf of PAP to Leung come Tuesday for loose mouth ex TCJ. And Leung will all guns firing on Iswaran and TCJ loose cock and CLH loose pussy.
Beware ! She may throw her bra on the seat and whack Ah leong with her tual liap nee.:roflmao:
 

k1976

Alfrescian
Loyal

SINGAPORE - Leader of the House Indranee Rajah has sought an apology from Progress Singapore Party (PSP) secretary-general Leong Mun Wai and asked him to remove a video posted on his party’s Facebook page, saying it gave a false and misleading impression that the Ridout Road issue was not fully aired in Parliament.

Speaking in Parliament on Wednesday, she said the video also gave the impression that Mr Leong was not allowed to ask questions after the House heard ministerial statements on Monday on the rental of two black-and-white state bungalows at 26 and 31 Ridout Road by Law Minister K. Shanmugam and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan.

The video, posted at around midnight on Tuesday, started with clips of exchanges between Mr Leong, who is a Non-Constituency MP, asking questions on the Ridout Road issue, before showing an exchange between him and Deputy Speaker Christopher de Souza.

Mr Leong had asked Mr de Souza to “not end the debate early because it is an important topic... All Singaporeans are watching this debate”. Mr de Souza’s response was that the Speaker decides when to end the session, and based on parliamentary procedure, the House does not debate ministerial statements, though MPs can ask for clarifications.

The video was accompanied by the caption: “What some online commenters are calling another ‘sia suay’ (embarrassing) moment. The PSP’s Leong Mun Wai and Hazel Poa are here to do whatever it takes to ensure that the voice of people is heard.”

Ms Indranee said the video “gives a false impression that issues on the Ridout matter could not be fully ventilated because Mr Deputy Speaker would not allow a debate despite a plea by Mr Leong for this to happen”.

It did not reflect that questions were put to the ministers, who were held to account and did respond, she added, in raising a point of order during Wednesday’s sitting. Any MP can raise a point of order to bring a breach of order or Parliament rules to the Speaker’s attention.

Ms Indranee noted that the debate had gone on for almost five hours at the point of the exchange between Mr Leong and Mr de Souza.

The whole issue was discussed in Parliament for six hours, with two hours of ministerial statements from four ministers and clarifications taking up 3 hours 48 minutes, she added.

She pointed out that in total, Mr Leong asked 11 questions during the session and Mr de Souza had given him multiple opportunities to do so.

Ms Indranee reminded MPs that they are obliged to uphold proper conduct in and out of Parliament under the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act.

She noted that Mr Leong had breached parliamentary rules on multiple occasions, from 2021 to as recent as March 2023.

In response, Mr Leong said the “sia suay” comment in the Facebook post was referring to himself, and not Mr de Souza.

“My communications department, specifically, is using a past example about people calling me ‘sia suay’, so this (phrase) is... referring to another instance that some people online may think that it is ‘sia suay’,” he said.

The video put up by his party was “just an expression”, Mr Leong added. “In this country, we’re still supposed to have free expression.”


To that, Ms Indranee said that while there is free expression in Singapore, it “has never extended to falsehoods, scandalously defaming somebody or misrepresenting situations or facts or misrepresenting what happened in Parliament”.

She asked Mr Leong to respond to her request for an apology to Parliament and removal of the Facebook post by Thursday.

Mr Leong said he would discuss the matter with his party and give a formal response as soon as possible.

https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...ise-remove-sia-suay-video-on-ridout-road-saga
Why sia suay?
A real gentleman should know when to admit one mistake, your mummy did not teach u hah?
 
Top