Old Fart Has Been LYING for 45 Years On Msia Separation

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
May 28, 2010

Separation from Malaysia: How crucial was Dr Goh's role?

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
MINISTER Mentor Lee Kuan Yew made an interestingly significant remark about Singapore's separation from Malaysia in his eulogy at Sunday's state funeral for his colleague-in-arms, former Deputy Prime Minister Goh Keng Swee.
MM Lee said he had asked Dr Goh to negotiate a looser rearrangement for Singapore, but to keep Singapore within Malaysia.
Added MM Lee: 'He (Dr Goh) decided that the best alternative was a clean break. After (Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister) Tun Abdul Razak and (Minister for External Affairs) Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman agreed, (Law Minister) Eddie Barker and I worked furiously to settle the terms of the separation.'
MM Lee's remark is intriguing in the light of the conventional narrative of the events leading up to Separation in 1965. From all that historians have gleaned prior to MM Lee's remarks on Sunday, MM Lee, who was then Prime Minister, played the pivotal role involving Separation.
His remarks suggest that the decision to break away from Malaysia was decided unilaterally by Dr Goh at the crucial moment; against the proposition MM Lee, and perhaps the collective Cabinet, had decided; which was at the very least, to still remain a part of the Malaysian federation of states.
If the above is true, the apparent contradiction should be resolved. A key question that arises from MM Lee's remarks is this: What was the extent and significance of Dr Goh's role in Separation? Furthermore, MM Lee's remark also suggests that the key Malaysian leaders - Tun Razak and Dr Ismail - agreed to Dr Goh's proposal of a clean break.
This would imply that it may well have been Singapore which precipitated the idea of Separation, rather than Malaysia, as has been the notion all this while, stemming from first Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman's view. He reconfirmed, when I interviewed him a few years before he died, that he overruled the strident objections of his extremist colleagues in Umno in deciding to sack Singapore from Malaysia.
It would be informative, if not instructive, if MM Lee or Dr Toh Chin Chye (then chairman of the PAP and the only key surviving member of the Old Guard today) shed more light on this critical turning point in the history of Singapore and Malaysia.
Associate Professor Hussin Mutalib
<!-- story content : end -->
 
Go to the National Library and borrow this book -

OUSTED

it is written by a Australian working in Malaysia at that time.
You will have a balanced view after reading it.
 
Lucky seperate otherwise we will be using RM now

Many people here are more lucky to use SGD but can't even afford to buy a small and cramped HDB flat..just to have a roof over the top..
 
Wasn't Spore kicked out because LKY was causing problems.:confused:

After 50 years we know the mischief LKY can cause & the Malaysian leaders are not dumb, they know a snake when they see one, many of them are from the same mould :D

LKY might quibble about how he was kicked out, but the fact is that he was the biggest reason Spore got kickied out :rolleyes:
 
Alamak, even this fellow with a PhD don't understand what MM Lee said!

Maybe some m&ds still have residual misgivings that they did not become the bumiputras of Singapore - enjoying the privileges without having to lift a finger or shedding a drop of sweat.

You don't need a PhD to understand what MM Lee said. This fellow thinks that MM Lee is trying to put the blame of separation on Dr Goh. In fact what MM Lee has done is to honour Dr Goh for opting a clean break from Malaysia - a wiser decision.

Singapore could have suffered even more if it was still attached to Malaysia in some "loose" ways. Singapore could be continually bullied by the Federal government; there could be some modified bumiputras privileges - the Malays were given free school fees up to University level - while poor Chinese and Indians had to work hard to pay the school fees!!!!

We can also understand MM Lee's feeling as he and The Tungku and Razak were all closed buddies in Malaya and in London. Now you understand why millions of school children and Sporeans watch MM Lee cried when he said " ...it is a moment of anguish. All my life, my whole adult life, I believed in merger and unity of the two territories. ..." .

Of course some would say that MM Lee was hoping to be the Prime Minister of Malaysia (or even a deputy PM) than the PM of tiny resourceless Singapore. Who wouldn't want to be if they were in his position?

Even Mahathir has said that MM Lee is "a big frog in a small well" (Mahathir of course is stingy in his praise, or being sarcastic, did not want to quote the classic Chinese idiom "big fish in a small pond".).

Anyway it was a good thing that Singapore separated politically from Malaysia. Otherwise the Singapore Chinese and the Indians and the "others" could be the second class citizens of Malaysia.
 
Last edited:
Politicians are paid to lie .

Goh Keng Swee 's funeral is a prelude to justify spendings for the OLD FART 's exit .
 
Why do people like to attend Town Council's dinner with MPs ?


Simply herd mentality ! Not like it's free ?

Those paying it are actually subsidizing those who are not .
VVIPS and their followers not paying .
 
Back
Top