Of Chinese Hypocrisy, "Internal Affairs" and the Chinese Fifth Column

PTADER

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
2,378
Points
113
Back then...

Principles of China's Foreign Policy
"China says its decisions on foreign policy questions derive from the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence. The Chinese leadership originally enumerated these principles in 1954"


Recently...

"The Tibet issue is purely China's domestic issue. The Chinese government and people, as always, oppose any country or anyone to interfere in China's internal affairs on the pretext of the Tibet issue," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu to the US.


Now...

"The Chinese government has always pursued peaceful coexistence in international relationship and non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries. But with regard to the infringement on China's national interests, violations of legal rights and interests of Chinese citizens and businesses, which may damage the friendly relationship between China and the host country, we will not sit idly by." Dr Huang, Chinese Ambassador to Malaysia
 
This absolute fucking dumbfuck of a brainless Ah Tiong ambassador, has just made life unpleasant and difficult for the 46 million Chinese diaspora scattered around the world, from Africa to the Americas to Europe to the Middle East, Oceania and to South East Asia.

This brainless dumbfuck needs to know that when Chinese choose to emigrate and settle in their countries of choice, they are no longer "Chinese citizens". They are citizens of those countries. They are not his country's fifth column.

He should mind his own business in accordance to China's articulated principles of "non-interference in the internal affairs" of other countries. By stupidly and arrogantly shooting off his mouth, he will rekindle age old fears that Chinese communities around the world, especially in South East Asia, are the fifth columns of China.

Instead of sitting "idly by", this dumbfuck of an Ah Tiong should spend his energy looking into his own backyard and dealing with the racism, discrimination and violence China perpetrates against the Tibetans, Uighurs and the other 53 minority groups in China.

Hopefully China will exercise some common sense, give this dumbfuck a very public dressing down, remove him from his position and reiterate its policy of "non-interference".

If it does not, Governments around the world, particularly in South East Asia, will recalibrate their policies towards their citizens of Chinese ancestry with the view that as fifth columns of China, they represent a long term security threat to the countries they have chosen to emigrate to or settle in.

If it does not, expect the Americans and the Europeans to throw this back into their faces with renewed vigour when it comes to the "internal affairs" of China, from Tibet to Xinjiang to the disputed islands in the South China sea.
 
So this nigger was the one urging ppl not to vote for the WP due to "racism" and telling them to spoil their votes now claims chinese ppl of non chinese nationality are not chinese?

Fuck off la m&d You don't want to see chinese united obviously but you're lucky you have chinese dogs who will side you.

btw when you talk about violence, racism against minorities in china can you give examples other than uighers and tibetians? Chinese shop auntie never smile at minority is not racism ok.

Also can you explain why the double standards in racism like m&ds can steal and whack chinese and you won't call that racism but a chinese doesn't kiss a non chinese's ass = racism in your eyes.
 
Back then...

Principles of China's Foreign Policy
"China says its decisions on foreign policy questions derive from the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence: mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, non-interference in each other's internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence. The Chinese leadership originally enumerated these principles in 1954"


Recently...

"The Tibet issue is purely China's domestic issue. The Chinese government and people, as always, oppose any country or anyone to interfere in China's internal affairs on the pretext of the Tibet issue," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu to the US.


Now...

"The Chinese government has always pursued peaceful coexistence in international relationship and non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries. But with regard to the infringement on China's national interests, violations of legal rights and interests of Chinese citizens and businesses, which may damage the friendly relationship between China and the host country, we will not sit idly by." Dr Huang, Chinese Ambassador to Malaysia

either u are short sighted or naive.

the evil trouble maker on earth is non other than the U S Ass.

u don't find it strange that after decades of conflict in the middle east
, with the U S Ass intervening and 'helping'
yet tension and fighting still going on today

they are able to make missiles , advanced jet fighters
from the simple intel 4004 they developed the i7
but they are not able to solve the middle east problem ?

who control the World Bank the IMF and WTO ?
u think these are praise worthy organizations working for the good of mankind ?

what china doing today had been done by the british and americans long before
in a different world environment and rules
 
Maybe the ambassador worried about the many PRC expats in KL. The could easily be mistaken for locals.
 
Is not about domestic politics in this instance, it is about voicing out for the fellow ethnic Chinese (Han) race.

If China and Greater China, keep quiet, then who could tell UMNO to fuck themselves? You don't expect Tonychat the keyboard warrior to fuck his UMNO masters right?

Is about time to put those UMNO mats in their own place and not keep screwing the matland Chinese!
 
Maybe the ambassador worried about the many PRC expats in KL. The could easily be mistaken for locals.

This Chinese dumbfuck of an Ah Tiong was reading from a prepared script. Watch the video here and you will see how this 4 eyed fucker talked and behaved as though Malaysia is a colony of China.

[video=youtube;3LpfORAsCRY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=247&v=3LpfORAsCRY[/video]
 
This Chinese dumbfuck of an Ah Tiong was reading from a prepared script. Watch the video here and you will see how this 4 eyed fucker talked and behaved as though Malaysia is a colony of China.

So what if he is reading from a script?

Fact is that the UMNO mats are trying to persecute the ethnic Han Chinese again. Is about time China put the UMNO mats in their place.
 
USA and Moslems are like bickering and quarrelsome husband and wife who will never get any peace in their lives!

Why bring the Chinese into the picture?

Chinese people are peaceful people!

They always kept to themselves and never invade other countries and conquer civilizations!
 
Is about time to put those UMNO mats in their own place and not keep screwing the matland Chinese!

Those "matland" Chinese are free to leave "matland" if they are really screwed up. As a matter of fact, some of these these "matland" Chinese have already move on to Western countries. Many have also moved and continue to move to Singapore.

In Western countries, these "matland" Chinese gripe about "discrimination" by Whites against them. In Singapore, they continue to keep their "matland" citizenship even as they gripe about being discriminated against in Malaysia.

There's a simple solution to these perpetual gripe about being discriminated against by Whites, "mats", etc and that is: Return to China.

In 1959, China sent ships to Indonesia to take "home" these "discriminated" Indonesian Chinese. About 130,000 Chinese left for China. The rest chose to remain in Indonesia. 400,000 "discriminated" Indonesian Chinese rejected the "offer" of Chinese citizenship made to them by China under the principle of jus sanguinis. They chose to remain in "discriminatory" Indonesia.

There's nothing to stop China from doing this again. That 4-eyed dumbfuck of an Ah Tiong can offer these "matland" Chinese China-Chinese citizenships and arrange for China to send some ships over as it did in 1959 with Indonesia to ferry these "matland" Chinese back to China.

The problem though is this. It will face a huge embarrassment because for all their unending gripes about being discriminated against, these "matland" Chinese will prefer to remain as a minority in Malaysia or move on to Western countries than return to China. It's the same reason why many of these "matland" Chinese continue to remain as PRs in Singapore and remain as Malaysian citizens rather than take up Singapore citizenship.

So much for "discrimination". The reality is that life is as good as it can get for them in Malaysia, in South East Asia and in other parts of the world. It is in fact, way better than they can ever get living in China as part of the majority Han race even after all the "discrimination" that they have to "endure".
 
USA and Moslems are like bickering and quarrelsome husband and wife who will never get any peace in their lives!

Why bring the Chinese into the picture?

Chinese people are peaceful people!

They always kept to themselves and never invade other countries and conquer civilizations!

Cos the Mats in matland are always play the Bogeyman to the Chinese since there are internal trouble in matland.
 
So what if he is reading from a script?

Fact is that the UMNO mats are trying to persecute the ethnic Han Chinese again. Is about time China put the UMNO mats in their place.

This is exactly what the Europeans and especially the Americans are doing. They are putting these Han Chinese in their place for persecuting non Han Chinese citizens, i.e. the Tibetans and other non Han Chinese minorities.

So don't complain when the Americans send their nuclear warships and aircraft carriers to the South China sea to put the Han Chinese in their place and to make sure the Chinese know where they stand in the world order.
 
Those "matland" Chinese are free to leave "matland" if they are really screwed up. As a matter of fact, some of these these "matland" Chinese have already move on to Western countries. Many have also moved and continue to move to Singapore.

In Western countries, these "matland" Chinese gripe about "discrimination" by Whites against them. In Singapore, they continue to keep their "matland" citizenship even as they gripe about being discriminated against in Malaysia.

There's a simple solution to these perpetual gripe about being discriminated against by Whites, "mats", etc and that is: Return to China.

In 1959, China sent ships to Indonesia to take "home" these "discriminated" Indonesian Chinese. About 130,000 Chinese left for China. The rest chose to remain in Indonesia. 400,000 "discriminated" Indonesian Chinese rejected the "offer" of Chinese citizenship made to them by China under the principle of jus sanguinis. They chose to remain in "discriminatory" Indonesia.

There's nothing to stop China from doing this again. That 4-eyed dumbfuck of an Ah Tiong can offer these "matland" Chinese China-Chinese citizenships and arrange for China to send some ships over as it did in 1959 with Indonesia to ferry these "matland" Chinese back to China.

The problem though is this. It will face a huge embarrassment because for all their unending gripes about being discriminated against, these "matland" Chinese will prefer to remain as a minority in Malaysia or move on to Western countries than return to China. It's the same reason why many of these "matland" Chinese continue to remain as PRs in Singapore and remain as Malaysian citizens rather than take up Singapore citizenship.

So much for "discrimination". The reality is that life is as good as it can get for them in Malaysia, in South East Asia and in other parts of the world. It is in fact, way better than they can ever get living in China as part of the majority Han race even after all the "discrimination" that they have to "endure".


Already a lot of talented Malaysian Chinese are leaving matland for good and many came to Singapore. Of course, it comes with collateral damage like useless foreign trash Tonychat.

Anyway, UMNO better be careful what they'd wished for. If all good Chinese leave matland, then the matland ekonomi sure collapse.

I am interested to hear the view of matlander Chinese Tonychat. Any comments?
 
Last edited:
This is exactly what the Europeans and especially the Americans are doing. They are putting these Han Chinese in their place for persecuting non Han Chinese citizens, i.e. the Tibetans and other non Han Chinese minorities.

So don't complain when the Americans send their nuclear warships and aircraft carriers to the South China sea to put the Han Chinese in their place and to make sure the Chinese know where they stand in the world order.

China is not persecuting the Tibetian race. Is political not racial. PRC's view that Tibet is part of China. I am not here to argue for or against that.

But you don't get the Han Chinese crying for the blood of the Tibetians!
 
"GIANT CHINA AND TINY SINGAPORE are engaged in a high-stakes game of diplomatic chicken that will influence the way the rapidly rising Chinese mainland is seen by the rest of Asia. Having objected to a recent visit to Taiwan by Singapore Prime Minister-designate Lee Hsien Loong, Beijing is demanding that Singapore make unspecified amends for hurting "the core interests of China and the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese people." Singapore is standing firm, insisting on its right to make independent decisions. " FEER, 5 Aug 2004

For those Chinese and particularly the chauvinists who insist on seeing themselves as Chinese first, who still see China as their motherland and whose loyalties are based on ethnicities and not the nationality of the countries that they have chosen to settle in, this is my question to you:

Was Singapore right in not kowtowing and making "amends" to China for its decision which "[hurt] the core interest of China and the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese people?"

Did Singapore's decision to tell the Chinamen to fuck off as Singapore is an independent country and not a vassal state or fifth column of China the right decision?

It you answered "Yes" to both questions, you are agreeing to the core principle in G-G and country to country relations, i.e. mind your own business and don't interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign country.

And if it is okay for Singapore to adopt this principle, why is it not okay for the Malaysians to do likewise?

If you say Singapore was wrong on both counts, should you then not be better off taking the next flight out to China and being a China-Chinese citizen?
 
"GIANT CHINA AND TINY SINGAPORE are engaged in a high-stakes game of diplomatic chicken that will influence the way the rapidly rising Chinese mainland is seen by the rest of Asia. Having objected to a recent visit to Taiwan by Singapore Prime Minister-designate Lee Hsien Loong, Beijing is demanding that Singapore make unspecified amends for hurting "the core interests of China and the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese people." Singapore is standing firm, insisting on its right to make independent decisions. " FEER, 5 Aug 2004

For those Chinese and particularly the chauvinists who insist on seeing themselves as Chinese first, who still see China as their motherland and whose loyalties are based on ethnicities and not the nationality of the countries that they have chosen to settle in, this is my question to you:

Was Singapore right in not kowtowing and making "amends" to China for its decision which "[hurt] the core interest of China and the feelings of 1.3 billion Chinese people?"

Did Singapore's decision to tell the Chinamen to fuck off as Singapore is an independent country and not a vassal state or fifth column of China the right decision?

It you answered "Yes" to both questions, you are agreeing to the core principle in G-G and country to country relations, i.e. mind your own business and don't interfere in the internal affairs of a sovereign country.

And if it is okay for Singapore to adopt this principle, why is it not okay for the Malaysians to do likewise?

If you say Singapore was wrong on both counts, should you then not be better off taking the next flight out to China and being a China-Chinese citizen?

fuck off la nigger. China has every right to tell mudland to not bully their own citizens. It's a good thing. So it's ok for citizens of a country to get discriminated all because of their race?

Can mudland tell off singapore about so called fake malay discrimination in singapore?
 
China is not persecuting the Tibetian race. Is political not racial. PRC's view that Tibet is part of China. I am not here to argue for or against that.

Read this and try to convince yourself that it is "political" and not "racial".


But you don't get the Han Chinese crying for the blood of the Tibetians!

Don't get into self-serving hyperboles by relying on statistically insignificant numbers. Exactly, how many "mats" were crying out for "blood"? 1, 2, 3 , 200, 5,000, 10 million?
 

Utusan to Chinese envoy: Deal with prostitutes, not Petaling Street

Published Today 2:54 pm Updated Today 3:19 pm 71

Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia has lashed out at the Chinese ambassador saying he would do better to deal with his nation's prostitutes than to meddle in the Petaling Street issue.

This, the newspapers said in an opinion piece under the collective pen name Awang Selamat, was because Malaysia is allegedly flooded by sex workers from China.

"(Ambassador Huang Hui Kang) should trust this country's authorities to deal with the threat of illegal demonstrations at Petaling Street, which did not even happen.

"It would be better if the ambassador gives more focus to the issue of large numbers of Chinese nationals in the prostitution and massage industry in (Malaysia) as the Chinese government is more stern in dealing with such matters in their own country," Awang said in Utusan's Sunday edition Mingguan Malaysia.

The newspaper demanded an apology from Huang for the remarks made during his visit to Petaling Street on Friday.

"Huang needs to apologise or return to his country and be replaced with another diplomat who has more courtesy.

"Hopefully this will be the first and last violation by a Chinese diplomat. Do not be a busybody and go overboard," said Awang, usually one of the daily's senior editors.

'We can interfere in China too'

Huang had raised eyebrows after he visited Petaling Street on the eve of a planned protest there that was racially-charged and declared the Chinese government was against racial discrimination and extremism.

In a statement yesterday, the Chinese embassy defended Huang's visit, stating it was an act of goodwill in conjunction with the mid-autumn festival.

However, Utusan described the remarks as "shameful" as the ambassador should have known his limits, adding that China too would not like any quarters to interfere in its domestic affairs.

"Awang would like to remind China that it too faces many problems in the country and foreign diplomats including Malaysia can also interfere and comment on anything," it said.

Huang on Friday handed mooncakes to Petaling Street traders to celebrate mid-autumn or mooncake festival which falls today.

However, his statement which appeared to be a subtle reference to the racially motivated protest at Petaling Street led by government-linked figures, surprised Putrajaya.

Wisma Putra reportedly summoned Huang over his remarks and he is expected to provide his explanation to Malaysian officials tomorrow.

Petaling Street, also known as Chinatown, was the site of a rowdy protest by the red shirts on Sept 16 and was broken up by the police's federal reserve unit using water cannons.

One of the frontmen of the red shirts, Sungai Besar Umno division chief Jamal Md Yunos, threatened another protest on Sept 26 demanding that Chinatown be opened up to traders of other races and accusing businesses there of selling fake goods.

Jamal had alluded to riots if his demands were not met.

He was arrested on Friday and the planned protest was subsequently aborted.
 
Back
Top