Serious Now then they talk about money laundering in SG banks?

PinkaChung

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
188
Points
0
Channel NewsAsia Singapore News
Lapses in anti-money laundering controls detected in DBS, UBS, Standard Chartered
Today, 5:32 AM
"The deficiencies observed in DBS, SCB and UBS related to lapses in specific processes and by individual officers. The lapses were serious in their own right, and will be met by firm regulatory actions against the banks," MAS says.
 
Now that, they have "helped"...now they want to be the POLICE....it is a game of police & thief...like we used to play when we were young...we change sides after every game...same thing!
 
Now that, they have "helped"...now they want to be the POLICE....it is a game of police & thief...like we used to play when we were young...we change sides after every game...same thing!

无间道. :) ;);)
 
Channel NewsAsia Singapore News
Lapses in anti-money laundering controls detected in DBS, UBS, Standard Chartered
Today, 5:32 AM
"The deficiencies observed in DBS, SCB and UBS related to lapses in specific processes and by individual officers. The lapses were serious in their own right, and will be met by firm regulatory actions against the banks," MAS says.

Anybody with their eyes open and out on the streets would have known. When there's a sudden profusion of ferraris and lambos and high end apartments, it cannot be natural.
 
Anybody with their eyes open and out on the streets would have known. When there's a sudden profusion of ferraris and lambos and high end apartments, it cannot be natural.

Its Wayang Game. Now USA is coming down fast and hard on Najib. MAS has to wayang a bit. Anyway nothing will happen, just wayang together with FBI that they are doing something.
 
Channel NewsAsia Singapore News
Lapses in anti-money laundering controls detected in DBS, UBS, Standard Chartered
Today, 5:32 AM
"The deficiencies observed in DBS, SCB and UBS related to lapses in specific processes and by individual officers. The lapses were serious in their own right, and will be met by firm regulatory actions against the banks," MAS says.

All these 3 banks owned in part by either Stomacksick or GIC.
[h=1]Singapore Slings Arrows at Bank[/h][h=2]State Investment Company Presses U.K.'s Standard Chartered for Additional Independent Directors[/h]


By P.R. Venkat And
David Enrich

October 3, 2012
SINGAPORE—Temasek Holdings Pte. Ltd., the Singapore state investment company that is the biggest shareholder of Standard Chartered PLC, has been expressing its discomfort with the bank's governance and is pressuring it to appoint more independent directors, people familiar with the investment company said.
Temasek, which owns an 18% stake in Standard Chartered, doesn't have any immediate plans to sell its shares in the bank, people familiar with the investment company said. To register its unhappiness with the bank, it abstained from voting for the re-election of the nonexecutive directors to the board in May, one of the people said.
MI-BR597_TEMASE_DV_20121003175450.jpg
Ho Ching, CEO of Singapore's Temasek Holdings, is also the wife of Singapore's prime minister. Reuters Standard Chartered is based in London but does most of its business in emerging markets and has a significant operation in Singapore, including the headquarters of its private bank. It is one of the few banks that continued to expand through the financial crisis, and it has stepped up lending in Asia as other banks have pulled back.But the bank was blindsided over the summer by accusations from a New York regulator that it violated U.S. trade sanctions by hiding more than $250 billion of transactions with Iranian customers. Its shares plunged 20% on the news but have since recovered. The bank reached a $340 million settlement last month and remains under investigation by other U.S. regulators in the case.


MI-BR608_TEMASE_G_20121003185403.jpg
The Singaporean investment company first bought shares in Standard Chartered in March 2006, and investment bankers have been approaching it for years trying to arrange a deal to sell the stake. Temasek would seek a premium to the current share price for its stake in the bank, people familiar with the Singapore company's thinking say, adding that Temasek is still a "very long way off" from "a willing buyer, willing seller" situation.A person close to Standard Chartered said the dispute stems from Temasek's desire for the bank to have a supervisory board consisting of just one Standard Chartered executive, with the rest of the board made up of independent directors. Standard Chartered views this arrangement as incompatible with British governance rules, this person said. "It's a difference of opinion that's long been there," the person said.


[h=4]Related Reading[/h]


Standard Chartered has been considered an attractive takeover candidate because of its presence in fast-growing markets and its strong balance sheet. But the bank's relatively high valuation has made that less likely.



Even acquiring a large stake, such as Temasek's 18% position valued at $9.7 billion, could be difficult for another bank to pull off. A new set of rules governing bank balance sheets, known as the Basel III accord, requires banks to stockpile large quantities of capital if they hold minority ownership stakes in other financial institutions. The rules, which take effect gradually over coming years, already have prompted many large banks to ditch minority stakes in other institutions. Bankers and analysts say they are a powerful deterrent against acquiring additional stakes.
MI-BR615_TEMASE_D_20121003183009.jpg
ENLARGE



Standard Chartered last week announced that it will appoint four new independent, nonexecutive directors, but a person familiar with Temasek's thinking said the company hopes the bank will move further. Two of the independent directors will join the board in November and the other two will join in January.
A Standard Chartered spokesman said last week's board changes were part of a long-awaited "succession exercise" that has been in the works for more than a year and didn't stem from shareholder pressure.
Before last week's announcement, 10 of the bank's 16 board members were independent, and it is unclear whether the ratio will change with the new appointments. The bank said last week that the "overall size of the board will remain broadly in line with current levels" but added that additional board changes will be announced by the bank's 2013 annual meeting in May.
 
[h=1]Singapore Inc.’s Bank Bet Losses Pile Up on UBS Scandal[/h]Netty Ismail


September 26, 2011 — 9:01 AM PDT Updated on September 26, 2011 — 9:48 PM PDT
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter








488x-1.jpg

The Singaporean national flag stands against the commercial buildings in the financial district of Singapore. Government of Singapore Investment Corp, which manages more than $100 billion of the city-state’s reserves, owned about 6.4 percent of UBS as of Dec. 31. Photographer: Charles Pertwee/Bloomberg News






Don't Miss Out — Follow Bloomberg On
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube










Recommended
Why Unilever Really Bought Dollar Shave Club
U.S. Maps 1MDB Fraud Trail From Kuala Lumpur to Hollywood
How You Can Book Etihad’s Insane First-Class “Apartments” With Miles
Full Show: What'd You Miss? (07/20)







Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Share on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on Google+E-mail






Government of Singapore Investment Corp. faces a 6.7 billion Swiss franc ($7.4 billion) loss as the biggest investor of UBS AG, topping unprofitable banking investments by the city’s sovereign wealth firms since 2007.
GIC also has about $500 million of unrealized losses on its Citigroup Inc. stake, according to Bloomberg calculations. Temasek Holdings Pte, Singapore’s other state investment company, divested shares in Bank of America Corp. and Barclays Plc at losses more than two years ago.
UBS shares declined to the lowest level in two-and-a-half years after the Zurich-based bank announced a $2.3 billion unauthorized trading loss that led to the resignation of its chief executive officer on Sept. 24. GIC and Temasek spent more than $25 billion buying stakes in U.S. and European banks in the past four years as the collapse of the subprime mortgage market led to more than $2 trillion in losses and writedowns worldwide.

“The sovereign wealth funds’ investments in international financial firms have not panned out as well as they hoped,” said Melvyn Teo, professor of finance at Singapore Management University. “Whether GIC should continue to hold on to UBS, it really depends on going forward how will the management deal with all the current problems.”
The Singapore firms, ranked among the world’s 10 largest sovereign wealth investors, have since poured more money into higher-growth emerging economies and other industries.
[h=2]‘Not Coordinating’[/h]“If we consider a longer-term horizon, then some of the issues like what UBS faces today should not be seen as failed investments,” said Inderjit Singh, a member of Parliament for the ruling People’s Action Party, and CEO of Infiniti Solution Pte, a provider of services to chipmakers. “However, from a Singapore Inc. perspective, with the two sovereign wealth funds not coordinating, I feel they have overinvested in the financial sector.”
The MSCI World/Financials Index declined 26 percent this year, underperforming the MSCI World Index, which has lost 14 percent. UBS shares have declined about 44 percent from this year’s high in February.

GIC “expressed disappointment and concern about the lapses and urged UBS to take firm action to restore confidence,” the bank said in a Sept. 20 statement after its senior management met in Singapore with Oswald Gruebel, who quit four days later as CEO of UBS.
[h=2]‘More Reluctant’[/h]“It may make GIC a lot more reluctant to take a significant stake in a company going forward,” said Teo at Singapore Management University. “If its future investment doesn’t pan out as well and it’s public, it’s going to take a reputational hit.”

Close all those tabs. Open this email.
Get Bloomberg's daily newsletter.












GIC, which manages more than $100 billion of the city-state’s reserves, owned about 6.4 percent of UBS as of Dec. 31. It became the bank’s largest shareholder when it converted 11 billion francs of notes into stock. The shares traded at about a fifth of the conversion price at the close on Sept. 23, though the 8.7 billion franc unrealized loss is partly offset by 2 billion francs in interest payments in the first two years of its investment.The fund also owns about 3.8 percent of New York-based Citigroup, the third-largest U.S. bank, after selling half of its original stake for a $1.6 billion profit two years ago. It’s the lender’s single-biggest investor, while 18 funds managed by State Street Corp. hold a combined 4.1 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
[h=2]Average Cost[/h]The average cost of Citigroup shares held by GIC was $29.50 each, after adjusting for a 1-for-10 reverse stock split in May, the Business Times newspaper reported in July. Citigroup traded 15 percent lower than GIC paid as of Sept. 23.
Jennifer Lewis, a spokeswoman for GIC, declined to comment on the fund’s unrealized losses in UBS and Citigroup.
GIC plans to hold on to the banking stakes for “many years” and will only consider selling if there are attractive offers, Tony Tan, the fund’s former deputy chairman, said in January. Tan was sworn in as Singapore’s seventh president on Sept. 1.
Sovereign wealth funds spent more than $70 billion supporting banks in Europe and the U.S. in the credit crisis, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
[h=2]‘Useful Capital’[/h]“GIC should be able to, as long-term investors, take short-term hits,” said Victoria Barbary, senior analyst at the Monitor Group in London. “That’s why they’re useful capital for companies. Just because they’re holding paper losses doesn’t mean they’re ever going to be realized; they’re not going to be forced to sell them.”
GIC said in its annual report in July that it boosted investments in emerging economies to tap higher returns, and cut back in Europe and the U.S. Emerging-market stocks made up 15 percent of its holdings from 10 percent a year earlier, while those in developed economies fell to 34 percent from 41 percent, it said.
The 20-year so-called nominal annualized rate of return was 7.2 percent in U.S. dollar terms as of the end of March, said GIC, which was established 30 years ago. The annualized real rate of return in excess of global inflation rose to 3.9 percent. GIC also published nominal returns for five- and 10-year periods.
[h=2]Increasing Transparency[/h]The losses prompted calls for more transparency, and GIC said on Sept. 19 in response to a Today newspaper reader that “the timing for the investment could have been better.”
The opposition Workers’ Party proposed this year that GIC’s annual reports should reflect its yearly performance.
“This will increase transparency and accountability to Singaporeans, who are the ultimate stakeholders and beneficiaries of the investments,” Chen Show-Mao, an opposition member of Parliament said in an e-mail on Sept. 23. Chen quit as the head of New York law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP’s Beijing office in July after winning a seat in the May elections.
Temasek sold its 3.8 percent stake in Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America in the first quarter of 2009 at a loss that may have totaled $4.6 billion. It also sold its 2 percent stake in London-based Barclays. The company, which managed S$193 billion ($147 billion) as of March, didn’t detail the size of those losses. Stephen Forshaw, a spokesman for Temasek, declined to comment.
Financial services companies made up 36 percent of Temasek’s portfolio as of March. It is the biggest investor in lenders including Standard Chartered Plc, the British bank that earns most of its profit in Asia, and Singapore’s DBS Group Holdings Ltd. It also owns stakes in China Construction Bank Corp. and India’s ICICI Bank Ltd.
“In aggregate the financial investments have paid off, especially those in Asia,” said Rachel Ziemba, a director at Roubini Global Economics in London. “But the one in UBS continues to be a headache for GIC, both because of economic losses, but also perhaps because of the reputational risk.”
 
Back
Top