• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

No Fool will Negotiate any arms treaty with Dotard, Nuke him! Don't talk what so ever! Everyone will celebrate!

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2018-10-23/doc-ifxeuwws7186325.shtml

特朗普宣称要扩充核武库 还点名要中国加入中导条约

特朗普宣称要扩充核武库 还点名要中国加入中导条约



630

[文/ 观察者网 徐乾昂]美国宣布将退出《中导条约》后,有一个好消息,和一个坏消息。
坏消息是,特朗普21日在白宫门回答记者提问时,宣称美国将继续扩充自己的核武器库,直到其他国家“学聪明(come to sense)”为止。届时,特朗普将会“乐意”减少美国的核弹头数。他在随后的回答中,继续点名中俄,称“这就是对他们的一种威胁”。他甚至还公开点名,中国应被纳入到《中导条约》。
好消息是,早前被指“怂恿特朗普退出条约”的美国安全顾问博尔顿,这次在莫斯科和俄方并没有“谈崩”。双方就两国之间多个安全相关条例进行了商讨,同意继续合作。俄方称谈判“很有建设性”。
特朗普:别在我头上这么玩
据CNN新闻网消息,美国总统特朗普于22日在白宫接受记者采访时说:
“俄罗斯并没有遵守条约的规定,他们好几年前早就应该学乖了。目前美国的钱比全世界任何一个国家都多,我们会继续扩充核武器库,直到他们学聪明为止。到时候一切(增加核武器的行为)就会停止,顺带一提,不仅是停止,核武器数还会减少,这是我乐意做的事情。但就目前而言,他们并没有遵守承诺。”
K7F8-hmuuiyw2229870.jpg

图自白宫视频截图
当场有记者提问,俄方是否会将此视为一种威胁?
特朗普则说,“你随便说个国家,这对他们都是一种威胁。这包括中国,包块俄罗斯,这包括任何一个想参与这场‘游戏’的国家。你们不能这么玩,不能在我头上这么玩。”
特朗普随后单独点名中国:他们应该被纳入到《中导条约》之内。
美国总统在上周末(20日)宣布退出《中导条约》,待决定生效还有半年的时间。消息一出,有不少媒体、专家批评特朗普在破坏世界和平,称他打开了“通往核战的地狱之门”,“世界将陷入另一次核危机”。当年和美方共同签署《中导条约》的戈尔巴乔夫,日前也出面批评特朗普“思维狭隘”。
美国国内也骂声一片。尤其是特朗普“甩锅中国”的言论,被不少美国议员、专家批为“胡扯”。
而外界揣测,怂恿特朗普做出这一决定的人,就是美国国家安全事务助理博尔顿(John Bolton)。这名“硬核鹰派”已于22日飞抵莫斯科,向俄方官员给出解释。
uMoX-hmuuiyw2230022.jpg

俄罗斯驻美使馆在21日发推,证实博尔顿即将抵达莫斯科
博尔顿:美国没有在勒索俄罗斯
据俄罗斯卫星通讯社22日消息,当天,博尔顿会见了俄联邦安全会议秘书帕特鲁舍夫(Nikolai Patrushev),双方一共进行了5个小时的会谈。随后博尔顿还和俄外长拉夫罗夫共赴晚宴。
TLvM-hmuuiyw2230156.jpg

博尔顿(左)和帕特鲁舍夫(右) 图自俄卫星通讯社
俄方在随后发出的一份声明中表示,会谈“很有建设性”,双方谈到了《核不扩散条约》、《全面禁止核试验条约》、《开放天空条约》、《化学武器公约》等条约,称美俄将继续加强两国间的合作,议题涉及反恐、禁毒、伊核问题、朝核问题等。
TfFG-hmuuiyw2230355.jpg

晚上,博尔顿和拉夫罗夫一起吃饭 图自拉夫罗夫推特
之前有传言称特朗普下一个目标就是退出《削减战略武器条约》。对此,博尔顿和帕特鲁舍夫商讨了“延长条约时效”的可能性,即到2026年。
此外,博尔顿向俄方消除了部分疑虑:比如美国退出《中导条约》并不是在借机“勒索”俄罗斯;美国目前还没有在欧洲部署“针对俄罗斯”的导弹。

BBC新闻网援引消息人士,称博尔顿和帕特鲁舍夫的这次会谈是“事先沟通好的”,他在俄罗斯的第一天还是“比较顺利”。
博尔顿还将在俄罗斯呆上1天,计划于当地时间23日会见俄罗斯国防部长绍伊古、以及俄罗斯总统普京。BBC称,23日的会谈完全就是针对特朗普最近的言论临时制定的,届时博尔顿将如何应对,还有待观察。
针对美总统特朗普称美国将退出《中导条约》一事,外交部发言人华春莹22日表示,就退出条约问题拿中方说事是完全错误的。她说:
《中导条约》是美苏两国冷战时期达成的重要军控与裁军条约。该条约对于缓和国际关系、推进核裁军进程,乃至维护全球战略平衡与稳定均发挥了重要作用,在今天仍具有十分重要的意义。单方面退约将造成多方面消极影响。
需要强调的是,就退出条约问题拿中方说事是完全错误的。我们希望有关国家珍视多年来之不易的成果,通过对话协商,慎重妥善处理与条约相关问题,在退约问题上三思而后行。



Trump declares that he wants to expand the nuclear arsenal. He also named China to join the China-Israel Treaty.
Trump declares that he wants to expand the nuclear arsenal. He also named China to join the China-Israel Treaty.
630

[Text / Observer Network Xu Wei Ang] After the United States announced that it would withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty", there is good news and bad news.

The bad news is that when Trump answered questions from reporters at the White House on the 21st, he declared that the United States will continue to expand its nuclear arsenal until other countries "come to sense". At that time, Trump will "willingly" reduce the number of nuclear warheads in the United States. In his subsequent reply, he continued to name China and Russia, saying that "this is a threat to them." He even publicly named, China should be included in the "Guidelines on the Guide."

The good news is that Bolton, the US security adviser who was previously accused of "Troump's withdrawal from the treaty," did not "talk collapse" in Moscow and Russia. The two sides discussed various security related regulations between the two countries and agreed to continue cooperation. The Russian side said the negotiations were "very constructive."

Trump: Don't play like this on my head.

According to CNN News, US President Trump said in an interview with the reporter at the White House on the 22nd:

"Russia has not complied with the provisions of the treaty. They should have learned it a few years ago. At present, the United States has more money than any other country in the world. We will continue to expand the nuclear arsenal until they learn to be smart. The act of increasing nuclear weapons will stop. By the way, not only will it stop, but the number of nuclear weapons will also decrease. This is something I am willing to do. But for now, they have not complied with the promise."

Figure from the White House video screenshot

A reporter asked questions on the spot, will Russia regard this as a threat?

Trump said, "You just say a country, this is a threat to them. This includes China, including Russia, including any country that wants to participate in this 'game'. You can't play like this, can't Play on my head."

Trump then named China separately: they should be included in the "Guidelines."

The US President announced his withdrawal from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" last weekend (20th), and it will take half a year until the decision goes into effect. As soon as the news came out, many media and experts criticized Trump for undermining world peace. He said that he opened the "gate to hell" to "the nuclear war." "The world will fall into another nuclear crisis." Gorbachev, who signed the "Guidelines on the Treaty" with the United States, also recently criticized Trump for "narrow thinking."

There is also a buzz in the United States. In particular, Trump’s remarks on “Shabu China” have been criticized by many US lawmakers and experts.

The outside world speculated that Trump made the decision, the US National Security Affairs Assistant John Bolton. The "hard-core hawks" flew to Moscow on the 22nd to give an explanation to Russian officials.

The Russian Embassy in the United States launched on the 21st, confirming that Bolton is about to arrive in Moscow.

Bolton: The United States is not extorting Russia

According to the Russian satellite news agency on the 22nd, Bolton met with the secretary of the Russian Federal Security Council, Nikolai Patrushev, and the two sides held a total of five hours of talks. Later, Bolton also went to the dinner with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov.

Bolton (left) and Patrushev (right) from the Russian Satellite News Agency

In a subsequent statement issued by the Russian side, the talks were "very constructive" and the two sides talked about the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty, the Chemical Weapons Convention, etc. The treaty said that the United States and Russia will continue to strengthen cooperation between the two countries on issues such as anti-terrorism, drug control, the Iranian nuclear issue and the DPRK nuclear issue.

In the evening, Bolton and Lavrov eat together. Picture from Lavrov Twitter

There have been rumors that Trump’s next goal is to withdraw from the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. In this regard, Bolton and Patrushev discussed the possibility of "prolonging the treaty's statute of limitations", that is, by 2026.

In addition, Bolton has removed some doubts from Russia: For example, the withdrawal of the United States from the "Guidelines on the Treaty" is not an opportunity to "blackmail" Russia; the United States has not yet deployed "targeting Russia" missiles in Europe.

The BBC News Network quoted sources as saying that the talks between Bolton and Patrushev were "good communication in advance" and that he was "smooth" on the first day in Russia.

Bolton will also stay in Russia for one day. He plans to meet with Russian Defense Minister Shoygu and Russian President Vladimir Putin on the 23rd. The BBC said that the 23rd talks were entirely based on Trump's recent remarks, and it remains to be seen how Bolton will respond.

In response to US President Trump saying that the United States will withdraw from the "Guidelines on the Treaty", Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying said on the 22nd that it is completely wrong to take the Chinese side on the issue of withdrawing from the treaty. she says:

The "China-Treaty Treaty" is an important arms control and disarmament treaty reached between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The treaty has played an important role in easing international relations, advancing the process of nuclear disarmament, and even maintaining global strategic balance and stability. It is still of great significance today. A unilateral withdrawal will have multiple negative effects.

What needs to be emphasized is that it is completely wrong to take the Chinese side to say that it has withdrawn from the treaty. We hope that the countries concerned will cherish the hard-won achievements over the years, carefully and properly handle issues related to the treaty through dialogue and consultation, and think twice before retiring.
 

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dotard has ABSOLUTELY NO REPUTATION GLOBALLY, no fool will trust him.

Talk to him is waste of time.

He caused the golden opportunity window for China to screw USA permanently.

Seize this BEST OPPORTUNITY to rid USA for good, and Majority of the world will welcome this change.
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dotard is so pathetic!

Bankrupted beggar USA knows that China will not lend them further money to arm race with itself, no money to arm race, then dream to get China into Arms Treaty Deal? Lan Jiao you dream!

This is the time to catch the chance, since Dotard abolished treaty with Putin, just LEND MONEY TO PUTIN to DOUBLE TRIPLE RUSSIAN NUKES! And 10 fold increase the Chinese PLA Rocket Army nuke stock level. Give Kim Jong Nuke a cut also! Don't lend Dotard a single cent to buy arms! Give him middle finger when he asked to negotiate! Tell him to suck! Make him suck hard!

Better thing is to directly start the nuke war and erase USA from world map. Most unlike China which is a 5000 years ethnic and cultural based country, USA is a young punk bastardization hub which is next to no foundation, no body will remember that they were US citizens after USA got nuked. You go ask Gopalan Nair if still alive after nuke, he will say he came from Pee Sai! Amos Yee will say he had no idea how he got there may be IMH sent him there! China will exist because billions of Chinese are everywhere and their culture of 5000 years can never be erased by nuke, China will exist after nuke war, USA is the 1st to be forgotten totally.
 

Tony Tan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Just proceed to war after issuing a warning, basically said Dotard asked for it!


http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_62085_68032.html#p=1


合留长箭射天狼:中国弹道导弹将如何反制美国退出中导条约

支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看
2018.10.23 20:28:52

  • 2CXx-hmuuiyw5448448.png
  • 1 / 5
    10月20日,美国总统特朗普在出席内华达州埃尔科市的一场集会后表示,他将宣布美国退出《中导条约》。走马上任一年多来,特朗普带领美国“退群”早已是见怪不怪的事情了,不过这次宣布退出《中导条约》还是美国第一次宣布退出一项限制军备条约。在“退群声明”中,特朗普还专门强调了:如果中俄承诺不再发展同类型的武器,美国也可以考虑不退出条约。在我们看来,这种说法实在有些牵强附会,因为中国本非条约缔约国,美国“退群”用中国打幌子只能说明,其要么是坏要么是蠢。那么本期《出鞘》我们就来谈谈美国退出《中导条约》对中国究竟有何影响。(查看完整内容搜索微信公众号:sinamilnews)


合留长箭射天狼:中国弹道导弹将如何反制美国退出中导条约

支持 键翻阅图片 列表查看

全屏观看
2018.10.23 20:28:52


  • -vvE-hmuuiyw5448460.png
  • 2 / 5
    要弄清楚美国退出《中导条约》对中国的影响,我们先得搞清楚什么是《中导条约》和美国为什么要退出。所谓《中导条约》其全称为《美苏关于消除中程和短程导弹条约,Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles》,签订于1987年。顾名思义,该条约缔约国仅美苏两国,所限制的导弹类型除了众所周知的“中程导弹”(射程1000-5500公里)外,还包括“短程导弹”(射程500-1000公里)。同时,该条约仅限制了美苏双方陆基弹道导弹(Ground-Launched Ballistic Missile,GLBM)与陆基巡航导弹(Ground-Launched Cruise Missile,GLCM),而对空基导弹、海基导弹、潜基导弹没有任何限制。

  • FXVN-hmuuiyw5448467.png
在《中导条约》的条文中,明确规定了苏当时在役的RSD-10(北约代号SS-20)、R-12(SS-4)和R-14(SS-5)导弹为中程导弹;OTR-22(SS-12)、OTR-23(SS-13)。与之对应美国在役的潘兴II型、BGM-109G(也就是陆基战斧)型为中程导弹;潘兴IA型为短程导弹。两国的上述导弹均应在条约规定的时间内予以销毁。此外,两国还承诺不再发展射程在500-1000与1000-5500公里内的导弹。这包括了当时苏正在发展的RK-55(SSC-X-4)导弹和潘兴IB导弹。



  • To0R-hmuuiyw5448477.png
在条约附录中,双方明确了各自应该销毁的导弹数量为:苏应在条约第一阶段销毁处于部署状态的470枚中程导弹和387枚短程导弹;未处于部署状态的356枚中程导弹和539枚短程导弹。在条约第二阶段销毁650枚中程导弹和726枚短程导弹。共计销毁导弹数量为3128枚,导弹发射架数量为845具。与之相对,美国需要销毁的导弹数量为第一阶段859枚、第二阶段411枚,共计1270枚导弹和283具发射架。可以看到,苏需要销毁的导弹数量、导弹发射架数量均约为美国的3倍。据此也有很多人认为在美苏《中导条约》中,苏实则“吃了大亏”。



Http://slide.mil.news.sina.com.cn/k/slide_8_62085_68032.html#p=1



Joint Long Arrow Shooting Sirius: How China's Ballistic Missiles Will Counter the US Exit from the China-Israel Treaty


Support button flip through pictures list view

Full screen view
2018.10.23 20:28:52



1 / 5
On October 20th, US President Trump said after attending a rally in Elko, Nevada, that he would announce the withdrawal of the United States from the "Guide to the Intermediates." It has been a long time since Trump led the United States to "retreat the group", but this time the announcement of the withdrawal of the "Guide to the Central Treaty" is the first time the United States has announced its withdrawal from a treaty on arms limitation. In the "Retirement Statement", Trump also specifically emphasized: If China and Russia promise not to develop the same type of weapons, the United States can also consider not withdrawing from the treaty. In our view, this kind of argument is somewhat far-fetched, because China is not a party to the treaty, and the United States "retreating the group" with China can only show that it is either bad or stupid. Then, in this issue of "Sheathing", let us talk about the impact of the withdrawal of the United States Treaty on China. (View full content search WeChat public number: sinamilnews)



Joint Long Arrow Shooting Sirius: How China's Ballistic Missiles Will Counter the US Exit from the China-Israel Treaty


Support button flip through pictures list view

Full screen view
2018.10.23 20:28:52




2 / 5
To understand the impact of the withdrawal of the United States from the "Guidelines on China", we must first understand what the "Guidelines on the Guide" and why the United States should withdraw. The so-called "Medium Guide Treaty" is called "The United States and the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles". Signed in 1987. As the name suggests, the treaty states only the United States and the Soviet Union. The limited types of missiles include the short-range missiles (range 500-1000 km) in addition to the well-known "medium-range missiles" (ranges of 1000-5500 km). At the same time, the treaty only limits the Ground-Launched Ballistic Missile (GLBM) and Ground-Launched Cruise Missile (GLCM), and the air-based missiles, sea-based missiles, and potential bases. There are no restrictions on missiles.


In the provisions of the "Guidelines on the Treaty", it is clearly stated that the RSD-10 (NATO code SS-20), R-12 (SS-4) and R-14 (SS-5) missiles in service at the time of the Soviet Union were medium-range. Missile; OTR-22 (SS-12), OTR-23 (SS-13). Corresponding to the United States in service, the Pershing II and BGM-109G (that is, the land-based battle axe) are medium-range missiles; the Pershing IA is a short-range missile. The above-mentioned missiles of both countries shall be destroyed within the time specified in the treaty. In addition, the two countries also promised not to develop missiles with a range of 500-1000 and 1000-5500 km. This included the RK-55 (SSC-X-4) missile and the Pershing IB missile that Su was developing at the time.



In the appendix to the treaty, the two sides clarified that the number of missiles that should be destroyed should be: Su Ying destroyed 470 medium-range missiles and 387 short-range missiles in the first phase of the treaty; 356 medium-range missiles that were not deployed and 539 short-range missiles. In the second phase of the treaty, 650 medium-range missiles and 726 short-range missiles were destroyed. The total number of missiles destroyed was 3,128 and the number of missile launchers was 845. In contrast, the number of missiles that the United States needs to destroy is 859 in the first phase and 411 in the second phase, with a total of 1,270 missiles and 283 launchers. It can be seen that the number of missiles and missile launchers that the Soviet Union needs to destroy are about three times that of the United States. According to this, many people believe that in the US-Soviet Treaty, Su Shi "eats a big loss."
 
Top