• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ng Chee Meng issues lawyer's letter to Facebook user over 'false, misleading & defamatory' allegations

Rich Sng never remove his fb post and he has hired lawyer
:FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU::FU:
Screenshot 2025-05-15 112351.png
 
And yet they keep quiet about this issue and give pap a free pass
WP could be biding their time to strike at the appropriate time. The Wankers have not always made sweeping moves, but rather focused on consolidating their gains and gradually building their presence. This measured approach is seen by me as capitalising on opportune moments or shifts in the political landscape.
 
The law is the last refuge of scoundrels. :cool:

Especially when the pertaining to the laws of a country rubberstamped by lawless 'lawmakers'. :sneaky:
 
WP could be biding their time to strike at the appropriate time. The Wankers have not always made sweeping moves, but rather focused on consolidating their gains and gradually building their presence. This measured approach is seen by me as capitalising on opportune moments or shifts in the political landscape.
Yes biding their time to earn more allowances....
 
Questions:

1.If the dinner was part of official engagement with private sector stakeholders, why did Sam Goi and others describe it as a private, informal gathering among friends?

2. How does Ng Chee Meng reconcile the discrepancy between the stated purpose of the dinner and the lack of transparency about who was invited and why?

3. Given the controversy over the timeline, can Ng Chee Meng clarify the exact date of the dinner and whether it complied with COVID-19 restrictions at that time?

4. What steps did Ng Chee Meng take to ensure that attendees at such private dinners did not present reputational or legal risks, especially given Su Haijin’s later criminal conviction?

5. Why was there no clear declaration or record of the dinner, as required by civil service protocols for gifts or benefits above a certain value?

6. How does Ng Chee Meng address public concerns about perceived elitism and special access for certain business figures, especially when such access is not available to ordinary citizens?

7. If ministers and public figures are expected to uphold higher standards, why was there a lack of proactive communication or accountability when the controversy surfaced?

8. Does Ng Chee Meng believe that simply not knowing Su Haijin personally is sufficient to address concerns about judgment and association, given the repeated presence of Su at elite gatherings?
All leegit questions but can be answered by a short and sweet official statement.

I doesn't know him de woh.
 
Back
Top