New Twist to Corruption in CNB - Top CID guys were under investigation by CPIB!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0

<TBODY>
[TD="class: msgF, width: 1%, align: right"]From:

<TBODY>
[TD="class: msgbfr1, width: 1%"][/TD]

[TD="class: msgFname, width: 68%"] rodliao <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgDate, width: 30%, align: right"]Jan-28 10:18 pm [/TD]

[TD="class: msgT, width: 1%, align: right"]To: [/TD]
[TD="class: msgTname, width: 68%"] Meritocracy <NOBR></NOBR>[/TD]
[TD="class: msgNum, align: right"](4 of 8) [/TD]

</TBODY>
[/TD]

[TD="class: msgleft, width: 1%"][/TD]
[TD="class: wintiny, align: right"] 62522.4 in reply to 62522.3 [/TD]

[TD="class: msgtxt"] Meritocracy says:
How do we know she slept with this 2 top men only, what about the rest? Why are they holding back the identity of the woman? Are they trying to cover up other top PAP men who have slept with her too?


[h=6]"Mr Ng was then counselled and issued with a Letter of Warning on 20 December 2010, but SPF assessed that he could continue with the Force. He was posted to head CNB in January 2011."[/h] The Online Citizen » Former CNB chief was probed by CPIB in 2010
theonlinecitizen.com A well-wisher of TOC wrote in to us on 25 January that he "had heard from reliable sources a long while ago (early 2011 or even in 2010) that top CID guys are under investigation by CPIB", and that it was around this time that Ng Boon Gay was shifted to CNB.
  • Anthony Lau This case is more serious then WP YSL affair. Mean someone in the top management is already know the matter. Just that someone is trying to cover up unitl the bubble got burst. <ABBR class="timestamp livetimestamp" title="Sunday, January 29, 2012 at 12:18pm">about an hour ago</ABBR> ·






More like a "you scratched my backside and I scratched yours" scenario. [/TD]

</TBODY>
 
<IFRAME style="POSITION: absolute; WIDTH: 10px; HEIGHT: 10px; TOP: -9999em" id=twttrHubFrame tabIndex=0 src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/hub.1326407570.html" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>[h=2]http://theonlinecitizen.com/2012/01/former-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010/

Former CNB chief was probed by CPIB in 2010[/h]Posted by theonlinecitizen on January 29, 2012 <DD_belatedPNG:shape style="Z-INDEX: 0; BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent; WIDTH: 99px; HEIGHT: 17px; TOP: 199px; LEFT: 538px" coordsize = "99,17" stroked = "f" path = " m0,0 l99,0,99,17,0,17 xe"><DD_belatedPNG:fill></DD_belatedPNG:fill></DD_belatedPNG:shape><DD_belatedPNG:shape style="CLIP: rect(1px 100px 17px 84px); Z-INDEX: 0; WIDTH: 100px; HEIGHT: 18px; TOP: 199px; LEFT: 538px" coordsize = "100,18" coordorigin = "1,1" stroked = "f" path = " m0,0 l100,0,100,18,0,18 xe"><DD_belatedPNG:fill src = "http://theonlinecitizen.com/wp-content/themes/newstube/images/comment.png" type = "tile" position = "55050f,3640f"></DD_belatedPNG:fill></DD_belatedPNG:shape>44 Comments
<!--end: postmeta-->
<!-- AddThis Button Begin --><IFRAME style="BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 90px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 25px; OVERFLOW: hidden; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; scrollbars: no; scrolling: no" src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&width=100&action=like&font=arial&layout=button_count" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no scrollbars="no"></IFRAME><IFRAME style="WIDTH: 110px; HEIGHT: 20px" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1326407570.html#_=1327912213231&_version=2&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&enableNewSizing=false&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&size=m&text=Former%20CNB%20chief%20was%20probed%20by%20CPIB%20in%202010%20&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F%23.TyZVEto26XY.twitter&via=AddThis" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>18

~by: Ravi Philemon~
Home-team.jpg

A well-wisher of TOC wrote in to us on 25 January that he "had heard from reliable sources a long while ago (early 2011 or even in 2010) that top CID guys are under investigation by CPIB", and that it was around this time that Ng Boon Gay was shifted to CNB.
The New Paper confirms today that former Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) Director Ng Boon Gay was investigated by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) in 2010, in relation to allegations of improper conduct of share dealings based on insider information.
"CPIB investigations concluded there was insufficient evidence that Ng had committed offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Subsequent Police investigation also found no evidence of insider trading or that he had benefitted from any insider information", a spokesman for Ministry of Home Affairs reportedly told that newspaper.
"The Singapore Police Force (SPF) assessed that even though Ng did not break any laws, he should have been more circumspect in his dealings with acquaintances so as to avoid any perception of partiality", the MHA spokesperson added.
Mr Ng was then counselled and issued with a Letter of Warning on 20 December 2010, but SPF assessed that he could continue with the Force. He was posted to head CNB in January 2011.
The spokesperson for MHA told the newspaper that his Letter of Warning was taken into consideration when posting him to head CNB, but that Mr Ng had performed well throughout his career in senior positions within the SPF, and that it 'was assessed that while this (warning letter) was a spot on his record, no criminal wrongdoings had been found, and his conduct did not render him unsuitable for the post".
<IFRAME style="BORDER-RIGHT-WIDTH: 0px; WIDTH: 90px; BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM-WIDTH: 0px; HEIGHT: 25px; OVERFLOW: hidden; BORDER-LEFT-WIDTH: 0px; scrollbars: no; scrolling: no" src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&layout=button_count&show_faces=false&width=100&action=like&font=arial&layout=button_count" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no scrollbars="no"></IFRAME><IFRAME style="WIDTH: 110px; HEIGHT: 20px" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1326407570.html#_=1327912213316&_version=2&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&enableNewSizing=false&id=twitter-widget-2&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F&size=m&text=Former%20CNB%20chief%20was%20probed%20by%20CPIB%20in%202010%20&url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonlinecitizen.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fformer-cnb-chief-probed-cpib-2010%2F%23.TyZVEiL7t5E.twitter&via=AddThis" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>18

<!-- START DONATE -->[h=2]HELP keep the voice of TOC alive![/h]If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.
 
So highly paid and still $ no enuff and must play shares? Any more doubt that greed knows now bound? The entire freaking Papaya Tree is rotten to the core! The 60% are really blind!
 
[h=3]44 Responses to “Former CNB chief was probed by CPIB in 2010”[/h]
  • d43156a856b841b24a3b254e7ab98ca1

    SmokingGun 29 January 2012
    <!--end: comment-head -->Finally, we have the truth, someone covered up for him! Where there is smoke there is Fire! Having a warning letter and still given the role to head CNB!!!! CNB involves dealing with ruthless people who deals with drugs and huge finances (Billions of ill gotten gains) , people willing to do anything to corrupt police officers or entrap them. WHY did MHA or DPM Teo decide to assign him the role of CNB Chief ? Unthinkable! I bet if they dig deeper there may be more dirt involve???
    Is ther a cover-up here or a deal for a fall with a lesser charge? is there more sinister deals with drug lords????
    PAP be transparent????


 
NBG's case is the first I came to know that despite a Letter of Warning, could move on from DCID to DCNB. In all other cases, it is cold storage for at least 3 or 5 years. With the said letter, wonder if his bonus was frozen. DCNB move can be construed as a promotion as you are head of a dept under MHA, similar to CP, Commissioner ICA, SCDF and Dir Prison. DCID post is not.
 
NBG's case is the first I came to know that despite a Letter of Warning, could move on from DCID to DCNB. In all other cases, it is cold storage for at least 3 or 5 years. With the said letter, wonder if his bonus was frozen. DCNB move can be construed as a promotion as you are head of a dept under MHA, similar to CP, Commissioner ICA, SCDF and Dir Prison. DCID post is not.

Question - are we THAT short of talent that we have to promote charlatans and cover backsides of the incompetents?
 
It certainly is a promotion. Warning letters have been issued just before promotion in the past and across other minsteries as well especially in Mindef. Usually minor in nature and the person is well liked by the establishment or by his direct superior or has a godfather. IM does not cover these things.
NBG's case is the first I came to know that despite a Letter of Warning, could move on from DCID to DCNB. In all other cases, it is cold storage for at least 3 or 5 years. With the said letter, wonder if his bonus was frozen. DCNB move can be construed as a promotion as you are head of a dept under MHA, similar to CP, Commissioner ICA, SCDF and Dir Prison. DCID post is not.
 
Question - are we THAT short of talent that we have to promote charlatans and cover backsides of the incompetents?


It's connections. That's why I still can't think of a good reason why all the publicity. MHA could have said many things without revealing the intimate details. NBG was a 'protected' breed before this. Could have taken departmental action (PSC) and leave by back door. 2 other SACs left that way without publicity for one and less publicity for the other.
 
So highly paid and still $ no enuff and must play shares? Any more doubt that greed knows now bound? The entire freaking Papaya Tree is rotten to the core! The 60% are really blind!

The core of the PAP Govt was rotten and contaminated the parts around it.
 
Back
Top