Nestle removes beef pasta meals after finding horsemeat

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
6,139
Points
63
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21501568

Nestle, the world's biggest food company, has removed beef pasta meals from shelves in Italy and Spain after tests revealed traces of horse DNA.

The Swiss-based firm has halted deliveries of products containing meat from a German supplier.

Nestle is the latest in a string of major food producers to find traces of horsemeat in beef meals.

A spokesman for the company said levels of horse DNA were very low but above 1%.

Last week the firm said its products did not contain horsemeat.

Nestle withdrew two chilled pasta products, Buitoni Beef Ravioli and Beef Tortellini, in Italy and Spain.

Lasagnes a la Bolognaise Gourmandes, a frozen product for catering businesses produced in France, will also be withdrawn.

A spokesman for the company told the BBC that Nestle had identified a problem with a supplier from Germany.
 
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/43496dda-79fa-11e2-b377-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2LJiNO09v



Horsemeat scandal draws in Nestlé
By Louise Lucas, Andrea Felsted, Quentin Peel and Jim Pickard

The escalating horsemeat scandal has ensnared two of the biggest names in the food industry, Nestlé, the world’s number-one food maker, and JBS, the largest beef producer by sales.
Switzerland-based Nestlé on Monday removed pasta meals from shelves in Italy and Spain and suspended deliveries of all processed products containing meat from German supplier, H.J. Schypke, after tests revealed traces of horse DNA above 1 per cent. Nestlé said it had informed the authorities.


H.J. Schypke was subcontracted by JBS Toledo, part of Brazil-based JBS, which claims on its website “to supply the ready meals and catering industry with only the highest quality processed meat without concessions. From the selection of animals to the final packing, every facet of the production flow meets the most exacting requirements.”
JBS late on Monday moved to distance itself from the scandal, saying none of the tainted products came from its factories and clarifying that H.J. Schypke “is not in any way part of the JBS Group”.
Nestlé withdrew two chilled pasta products, Buitoni Beef Ravioli and Beef Tortellini from sale in Italy and Spain. Lasagnes à la Bolognaise Gourmandes, a frozen meat product for catering businesses produced in France, will also be withdrawn.
“We are also enhancing our existing comprehensive quality assurance programme by adding new tests on beef for horse DNA prior to production in Europe,” said Nestlé, which just last week said products under its labels were not affected.
The withdrawal came as the UK and Germany pledged to step up testing. In the UK senior retailers and manufacturers, at a meeting with Owen Paterson, UK environment secretary, pledged to continue testing after the initial scrutiny of beef products, which should be completed in the next two weeks.
There was a recognition, said one executive who attended the meeting, that there would be more surveillance of retailers’ supply chains, and more unannounced audits of contractors’ premises.
The 10-point plan from Germany promises to go beyond the EU programme in looking for any other undeclared additives, according to Ilse Aigner, food and agriculture minister for the federal government.
Britain’s Food Standards Agency will publish test results on a quarterly basis. Further results will be announced this Friday as the focus switches to chilled foods and grocery products such as tinned foods.
Nielsen, the consumer research group, said sales of frozen burgers in the week to February 2 fell 40 per cent, and more than two-thirds of British adults said they would be less likely to buy frozen meat products in the future.



Mr Paterson said the food industry had shown “absolute determination” to restore consumer confidence in meat.
Two people who attended the meeting described it as “constructive”. However, the minister was challenged by several people on how quickly the Food Standards Agency and the Department of Environment acted on intelligence it had received on the food supply chain. One retailer also said an attack by David Cameron on the supermarkets on Friday “had not necessarily been helpful”.
The testing, which some supermarkets already carry out, will mean extra costs for retailers at a time of weak consumer confidence.
Suppliers reckon they will end up bearing the brunt of the cost – adding to the pressure on margins which, some say, caused the problem in the first place.
“The people who in the end will suffer are the food manufacturers, because they will be forced to undertake testing. And the people with the power in this relationship on the whole are the food retailers,” said one industry player.
Many believe equine testing is just the tip of the iceberg. “I am sure this will rapidly move on to other species,” said Adam Couch, chief executive of Cranswick, a meat and pastry goods supplier, which has not been implicated in the scandal.
Amid concerns over food safety from religious and ethnic minority groups, the Muslim Council of Britain called on the community to avoid processed meat products certified by organisations that have previously certified products found to be contaminated.
Anil Bhanot, a founder member of the Hindu Council UK, told the Financial Times that the testing should not be restricted to horsemeat. “We should be worried equally for beef getting into other products,” he said. “Testing should be comprehensive and accurate.”
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with eating but;

1) culturally not acceptable as food by many people similar to dog meat
2) some horses are treated with certain medications that cannot enter the human chain
3) horse meat for human consumption follows different routes to pet food consumption.
4) no one wants to pay more for something that is cheaper
5) no one likes to be misled.



Can someone tell me what is wrong with horsemeat?

Cheers!
 
Nothing wrong with eating but;

1) culturally not acceptable as food by many people similar to dog meat
2) some horses are treated with certain medications that cannot enter the human chain
3) horse meat for human consumption follows different routes to pet food consumption.
4) no one wants to pay more for something that is cheaper
5) no one likes to be misled.

Thanks for your reasons. But I think it is not as serious to warrant the reactions people are taking. To your points:

1) In certain European countries (eg, France) and some Middle-Eastern and African countries, horsemeat is fair game. I think some Yanks too consume horsemeat as normal food. Horsemeat doesn't fall into religious badbooks like pork, horse is a herbivore and hoofed animal. No reason to be suspiscious of its flesh. Same case as camel/ deer meat.
2) Inspection before slaughter for food should be carried out - same a cows for beef.
3) ??
4) Raw material (in this case, the meat) costs will account far less than packaging, transport, refrigeration, marketing and administrative costs.
5) Reasonable, but consider (1).

Cheers!
 
Thanks for your reasons. But I think it is not as serious to warrant the reactions people are taking.

I think the main concern is that this could happen. That someone could introduce an alien substance into the food chain. That the regulators failed to detect this.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/wordofmouth/2013/jan/16/would-you-eat-horsemeat

Would you eat horsemeat?

Versatile, healthy and in plentiful supply, there are many ways to prepare delicious dishes with horsemeat


The news that traces of horse DNA have been found in burgers on sale in UK supermarkets has predictably resulted in a minor storm – and a groanworthy selection of jokes – in the newspapers and on social media. But how rational is our horror of eating horse? And is it time to examine our prejudice against what is, after all, an extremely healthy meat?

Of course, the main reason to be scandalised by yesterday's revelations is not that Tesco was selling burgers containing horse, but that they weren't labelled as such. It's not illegal to sell horsemeat in the UK, but it is illegal to sell food containing ingredients that aren't listed on the label. The products in question also included traces of pig DNA, which is considerably more shocking, if you believe that a religious ban on eating pork carries more weight than a moral aversion to eating horse (although horsemeat is also forbidden under some religious dietary laws).

But why do we find it so shocking? After all, horsemeat is widely enjoyed around the world; across Europe, in South America and in east Asia – it's even been used by sushi chefs in Japan as a substitute for otoro bluefin tuna. In 2007, Gordon Ramsay devoted an episode of The F Word to horse, trying without much success to persuade British consumers of its benefits, with limited success. But why not? Horsemeat is healthy, being lower in fat than beef. It's lower in cost too, and has a sweet, gamey flavour akin to venison.

For most people in the UK, horses are seen as sporting and companion animals in the same class as cats and dogs, rather than lumped in with pigs and cattle. But our national devotion has led to overbreeding on a massive scale, and large numbers of animals that are too slow to race, no longer fit for competition or whose owners can no longer afford to keep them as pets, are destroyed each year. Some are cremated, some sent to hunt kennels to feed hounds, some processed into pet food. It's estimated that thousands are slaughtered in the UK each year for consumption abroad, and alleged that, despite the ban on the export of live horses for slaughter, the trade does still take place. Surely it makes sense, instead, for the meat to be consumed here.

I conducted a quick online poll, and found that about 80% had never eaten horse, and of those half would be willing to give it a go. So, if you're in the group who are willing to bite the bullet, so to speak, and tuck into some ethically sourced, humanely slaughtered horse, where can you get hold of it?

It's not as difficult as you might think: horsemeat may not be commonly sold in the UK, but it's by no means unheard of. During rationing in the 1940s, it was eaten as an alternative to the unpopular whale meat, and today it's available from some butchers as well as specialised online retailers, who sell it alongside edible insects, camel and zebra.

One restaurateur happy to include horse on his menu is Fred Berkmiller of L'Escargot Bleu in Edinburgh. "I've been serving horse for about two and a half years," he says, "and demand for it is high. The supply is limited, because I like to be able to guarantee the provenance of the meat. I source it from a farmer in the south of France, who breeds the animals specifically for meat. He only slaughters three animals a month, I buy 10kg of rump, and it goes on the board until it is sold."

The response of British consumers to horse is similar to the way we used to regard rabbit, Berkmiller believes. "I wouldn't be surprised to see it on more menus within the next few years. You've got to educate people, same as with veal. The trade in horses is a dirty one, and I source my horsemeat as carefully as I do my beef."

At L'Escargot Bleu, horse is served as a tartare, prepared tableside. Berkmiller says if you can get hold of some happy horse rump steak, chop it finely, season and shape into patties. Serve with a raw egg yolk, bowls of chopped shallots, capers, parsley and cornichons, and freshly ground black pepper and Tabasco sauce on the side. Alternatively, he suggests cooking the steak quickly and enjoying it rare.

The animals served at L'Escargot Bleu are slaughtered at the age of two, but Fred explains that, unlike with cattle, there's no decline in the quality of the meat as the animal ages. This makes that it hard to tell whether you're cooking and eating a "happy" horse that's been specifically reared for meat, a failed racehorse, or a child's beloved pony, innocently passed on to a "good home". It's that lack of traceability that makes me reluctant to eat horse, but if I was presented with a plate of ethically sourced meat, I might feel differently.

What's your take on having Dobbin for dinner?
 
I think the main concern is that this could happen. That someone could introduce an alien substance into the food chain. That the regulators failed to detect this.

People should be more concerned about stuff that jeopardizes their health - eg. MSG in processed foods, aspartame in health drinks, and whatever crab they feed the cows that made them mad. Anyway, nothing wrong with blokes concerned about eating horsemeat, just thought that it is a little too trite a matter to make such a loud sound.

Cheers!
 
If you read the flurry of articles on this matter, the focus was not on the consumption of horsemeat per se but on the integrity of the food supply chain.

I would consider it serious as the food chain from start to finish has been seriously compromised. When AVA accepts meat imports from overseas, they actually fly someone to inspect the premises. All 1st world countries and many developed countries do the same. A totally foreign meat has been introduced.

The issue at the fore front is not religion but collapse of a system of control. The food supply is one of the fundamental infrastructure that a country spends considerably time. When we had the issue with contaminated pork meat (mind you same meat) we had to flush the entire system, re-inspect everything again and the decision was made to go cold chain.







Thanks for your reasons. But I think it is not as serious to warrant the reactions people are taking. To your points:

1) In certain European countries (eg, France) and some Middle-Eastern and African countries, horsemeat is fair game. I think some Yanks too consume horsemeat as normal food. Horsemeat doesn't fall into religious badbooks like pork, horse is a herbivore and hoofed animal. No reason to be suspiscious of its flesh. Same case as camel/ deer meat.
2) Inspection before slaughter for food should be carried out - same a cows for beef.
3) ??
4) Raw material (in this case, the meat) costs will account far less than packaging, transport, refrigeration, marketing and administrative costs.
5) Reasonable, but consider (1).

Cheers!
 
If they cannot guarantee what is stated on the food label then that is really bad. There would be no limits to the fraud. If it is horsemeat and not beef then who is to say that it wasn't a diseased horse? Diseased and aging horses being put down and instead of being incinerated have their meat sold as beef.
 
In Guizhou, China, their most famous food is horse meat bee hoon.
Have yet to tried it, anybody who has can give some feedback on the taste?
 
If the content does not tally with what's written on the label its breaking the law. The laws are in place to protect consumers and are more or less standardised throughout europe.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top