National Service and PAP

ivebert

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 11, 2010
Messages
2,521
Points
0
From a facebook comment:

Every person around me seems to support NS because they have wasted much of their youth on NS and that they believe that NS will defend Singapore. Well, advanced weaponry will defend Singapore, not 250,000 men who are sitting ducks to bomb raids in a modern warfare situation.

NS is used to create a class system like in the UK. Officers are the knights and the men are the slaves/farmers. The only difference is that Singapore does not have a long history of wars and there is no justification to give special status to some people. If you remove NS, the system of elitism and unfair concentration of resources will be gone.

With that gone, you think PAP will survive?









What do you think? :rolleyes:
 
Singapore is small and all able-bodied men must serve NS.

Women also? No. I don't want my mother, sisters, girlfriends, wife and daughters to serve NS.

FTs also? Whether T for talents or trash, no. I don't want to give arms to foreigners.
 
Singapore is small and all able-bodied men must serve NS.

Women also? No. I don't want my mother, sisters, girlfriends, wife and daughters to serve NS.

FTs also? Whether T for talents or trash, no. I don't want to give arms to foreigners.

What has the size of Singapore got to do with serving NS?

If you are talking about the need to obtain army personnel, then there are ways to recruit able-bodied men to sign on as regulars. Forcing them to pay more for a man or corporal will make them more efficient and save money for Singapore.

Please explain.
 
Stockholm syndrome. Sinkies like to convince themselves that NS builds their character, turns them from boys into men, foster cross-racial interaction et al. It's like rape victims thanking their rapists for providing free sex.
 
What has the size of Singapore got to do with serving NS?

If you are talking about the need to obtain army personnel, then there are ways to recruit able-bodied men to sign on as regulars. Forcing them to pay more for a man or corporal will make them more efficient and save money for Singapore.

Please explain.

Being small is a material restraint because even if you can afford all sign up as regulars now, and all willing, the economic and industrial productivity will correspondingly go down. And if that happens, government revenues will fall and even regulars can't be paid. Therefore, the bulk must be NS and reservists, and involved in the economy and industries too.
 
Anyone who has served NS would know that the whole institution is nothing more than a charade. 3-week high-key ICTs where NSmen virtually spend half of the time doing nothing. Military units that are lackadaisical in their daily operations only to stage a facade of competence whenever there are external audits. Malingering pervades the SAF. Sinkies would be better off having the shackles of NS removed from them, giving them the impetus to boost the economy and generate greater wealth to pay for a truly professional army of adequate size.
 
Anyone who has served NS would know that the whole institution is nothing more than a charade. 3-week high-key ICTs where NSmen virtually spend half of the time doing nothing. Military units that are lackadaisical in their daily operations only to stage a facade of competence whenever there are external audits. Malingering pervades the SAF. Sinkies would be better off having the shackles of NS removed from them, giving them the impetus to boost the economy and generate greater wealth to pay for a truly professional army of adequate size.

Adequate size would be about 100,000 at least in modern terms.
 
Being small is a material restraint because even if you can afford all sign up as regulars now, and all willing, the economic and industrial productivity will correspondingly go down. And if that happens, government revenues will fall and even regulars can't be paid. Therefore, the bulk must be NS and reservists, and involved in the economy and industries too.

You are thinking of keeping the current number intact. Why not reduce it to a bare minimum?

Keep the NS conscription law intact and only draft when we have war coming.

Contract out all the useless logistic and admin work.

Keep the professional force 50k strong. You save money and have a competent air/marine force. You keep so many army land soldiers for what?
 
Stockholm syndrome. Sinkies like to convince themselves that NS builds their character, turns them from boys into men, foster cross-racial interaction et al. It's like rape victims thanking their rapists for providing free sex.

Well said, u hit it right on the head.
 
NS is used to create a class system like in the UK.
Officers are the knights and the men are the slaves/farmers.
The only difference is that Singapore does not have a
long history of wars and there is no justification to give
special status to some people. If you remove NS,
the system of elitism and unfair concentration
of resources will be gone.


With that gone, you think PAP will survive?

It made Singaporean Men behave like some cock suckers .

And those strips made men go on ego trips .
 
Singapore is small and all able-bodied men must serve NS.

Women also? No. I don't want my mother, sisters, girlfriends, wife and daughters to serve NS.

FTs also? Whether T for talents or trash, no. I don't want to give arms to foreigners.

There is only one of 2 ways to go on this. If u believe that we are in serious danger, surrounded by hostile muslim neighbours that are much bigger than us, than all males AND females must do national service. U need everyone that can carry a rifle. See the Israel example.

If u don't believe that such a threat exists, than u must go with a professional army, like most of the world. Very few countries have national service with small threat.
 
There is only one of 2 ways to go on this. If u believe that we are in serious danger, surrounded by hostile muslim neighbours that are much bigger than us, than all males AND females must do national service. U need everyone that can carry a rifle. See the Israel example.

If u don't believe that such a threat exists, than u must go with a professional army, like most of the world. Very few countries have national service with small threat.


They are Muslim but you need to explain why they are "hostile"

What are you fearing for?

Terrorism?

Have a big army can defray these fears meh? Look at 9/11 on US.
 
Back
Top