• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

National Intelligence Council Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds

jubilee1919

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jul 30, 2011
Messages
2,589
Points
63
Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds

December 12, 2012 in Office of the Director of National Intelligence

This report is intended to stimulate thinking about the rapid and vast geopolitical changes characterizing the world today and possible global trajectories during the next 15-20 years. As with the NIC’s previous Global Trends reports, we do not seek to predict the future—which would be an impossible feat—but instead provide a framework for thinking about possible futures and their implications.

The world of 2030 will be radically transformed from our world today. By 2030, no country—whether the US, China, or any other large country—will be a hegemonic power. The empowerment of individuals and diffusion of power among states and from states to informal networks will have a dramatic impact, largely reversing the historic rise of the West since 1750, restoring Asia’s weight in the global economy, and ushering in a new era of “democratization” at the international and domestic level. In addition to individual empowerment and the diffusion of state power, we believe that two other megatrends will shape our world out to 2030: demographic patterns, especially rapid aging; and growing resource demands which, in the cases of food and water, might lead to scarcities. These trends, which are virtually certain, exist today, but during the next 15-20 years they will gain much greater momentum. Underpinning the megatrends are tectonic shifts—critical changes to key features of our global environment that will affect how the world “works” (see table on page v).

Extrapolations of the megatrends would alone point to a changed world by 2030—but the world could be transformed in radically different ways. We believe that six key game-changers—questions regarding the global economy, governance, conflict, regional instability, technology, and the role of the United States—will largely determine what kind of transformed world we will inhabit in 2030. Several potential Black Swans—discrete events—would cause large-scale disruption (see page xi). All but two of these—the possibility of a democratic China or a reformed Iran—would have negative repercussions. Based upon what we know about the megatrends and the possible interactions between the megatrends and the game-changers, we have delineated four archetypal futures that represent distinct pathways for the world out to 2030. None of these alternative worlds is inevitable. In reality, the future probably will consist of elements from all the scenarios.

Megatrends and Related Tectonic Shifts

Megatrend 1: Individual Empowerment

Individual empowerment will accelerate substantially during the next 15-20 years owing to poverty reduction and a huge growth of the global middle class, greater educational attainment, and better health care. The growth of the global middle class constitutes a tectonic shift: for the first time, a majority of the world’s population will not be impoverished, and the middle classes will be the most important social and economic sector in the vast majority of countries around the world. Individual empowerment is the most important megatrend because it is both a cause and effect of most other trends—including the expanding global economy, rapid growth of the developing countries, and widespread exploitation of new communications and manufacturing technologies. On the one hand, we see the potential for greater individual initiative as key to solving the mounting global challenges over the next 15-20 years. On the other hand, in a tectonic shift, individuals and small groups will have greater access to lethal and disruptive technologies (particularly precision-strike capabilities, cyber instruments, and bioterror weaponry), enabling them to perpetrate large-scale violence—a capability formerly the monopoly of states.

Megatrend 2: Diffusion of Power

The diffusion of power among countries will have a dramatic impact by 2030. Asia will have surpassed North America and Europe combined in terms of global power, based upon GDP, population size, military spending, and technological investment. China alone will probably have the largest economy, surpassing that of the United States a few years before 2030. In a tectonic shift, the health of the global economy increasingly will be linked to how well the developing world does—more so than the traditional West. In addition to China, India, and Brazil, regional players such as Colombia, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, and Turkey will become especially important to the global economy. Meanwhile, the economies of Europe, Japan, and Russia are likely to continue their slow relative declines.

The shift in national power may be overshadowed by an even more fundamental shift in the nature of power. Enabled by communications technologies, power will shift toward multifaceted and amorphous networks that will form to influence state and global actions. Those countries with some of the strongest fundamentals—GDP, population size, etc.—will not be able to punch their weight unless they also learn to operate in networks and coalitions in a multipolar world.

Megatrend 3: Demographic Patterns

We believe that in the world of 2030—a world in which a growing global population will have reached somewhere close to 8.3 billion people (up from 7.1 billion in 2012)—four demographic trends will fundamentally shape, although not necessarily determine, most countries’ economic and political conditions and relations among countries. These trends are: aging—a tectonic shift for both for the West and increasingly most developing countries; a still-significant but shrinking number of youthful societies and states; migration, which will increasingly be a cross-border issue; and growing urbanization—another tectonic shift, which will spur economic growth but could put new strains on food and water resources. Aging countries will face an uphill battle in maintaining their living standards. Demand for both skilled and unskilled labor will spur global migration. Owing to rapid urbanization in the developing world, the volume of urban construction for housing, office space, and transport services over the next 40 years could roughly equal the entire volume of such construction to date in world history.

Megatrend 4: Growing Food, Water, and Energy Nexus

Demand for food, water, and energy will grow by approximately 35, 40, and 50 percent respectively owing to an increase in the global population and the consumption patterns of an expanding middle class. Climate change will worsen the outlook for the availability of these critical resources. Climate change analysis suggests that the severity of existing weather patterns will intensify, with wet areas getting wetter and dry and arid areas becoming more so. Much of the decline in precipitation will occur in the Middle East and northern Africa as well as western Central Asia, southern Europe, southern Africa, and the US Southwest.

We are not necessarily headed into a world of scarcities, but policymakers and their private sector partners will need to be proactive to avoid such a future. Many countries probably won’t have the wherewithal to avoid food and water shortages without massive help from outside. Tackling problems pertaining to one commodity won’t be possible without affecting supply and demand for the others. Agriculture is highly dependent on accessibility to adequate sources of water as well as on energy-rich fertilizers. Hydropower is a significant source of energy for some regions while new sources of energy—such as biofuels—threaten to exacerbate the potential for food shortages. There is as much scope for negative tradeoffs as there is the potential for positive synergies. Agricultural productivity in Africa, particularly, will require a sea change to avoid shortages. Unlike Asia and South America, which have achieved significant improvements in agricultural production per capita, Africa has only recently returned to 1970s’ levels.

GlobalTrends2030.png


http://publicintelligence.net/global-trends-2030/
 
very informative discussion....interesting article ...thanks bro.
 
I thought Russia is one of those countries that will move up rather than go down. Remember it is one of the BRIC countries that are supposed to dominate the world collectively in the coming century.
 
US is already admitting they are not able to prevent China's rise as a global power.:)
 
Last edited:
I thought Russia is one of those countries that will move up rather than go down. Remember it is one of the BRIC countries that are supposed to dominate the world collectively in the coming century.


We will see a rematch of Russia vs USA in the coming years. Russia is already gaining fast momentum roping in allies and satellite nations via the energy sector.
 
US is already admitting they are not able to prevent China's rise as a global power.:)

China will be a global power but will not challenge US's supremacy. China is not a naval power, for one. It cannot effective secure the sea lanes by itself. Japan will challenge China, and is already doing so. As the chinese miracle fades over the next decade they will be using nationalism -- which they are already doing -- and projecting power inward to secure the borderlands. Prevent of foreign encorachment in coastal areas will be the priority rather than gaining superpower status.

Rest assured China will be kept in its place.
 
China will be a global power but will not challenge US's supremacy.

Rest assured China will be kept in its place.

What is of greater concern may not China achieving military supremacy globally but more a rash action by the US in desperation of losing its unquestioned global supremacy.
 
Demand for food, water, and energy will grow by approximately 35, 40, and 50 percent respectively owing to an increase in the global population and the consumption patterns of an expanding middle class. Climate change will worsen the outlook for the availability of these critical resources. Climate change analysis suggests that the severity of existing weather patterns will intensify, with wet areas getting wetter and dry and arid areas becoming more so. Much of the decline in precipitation will occur in the Middle East and northern Africa as well as western Central Asia, southern Europe, southern Africa, and the US Southwest.

We are not necessarily headed into a world of scarcities, but policymakers and their private sector partners will need to be proactive to avoid such a future. Many countries probably won’t have the wherewithal to avoid food and water shortages without massive help from outside. Tackling problems pertaining to one commodity won’t be possible without affecting supply and demand for the others. Agriculture is highly dependent on accessibility to adequate sources of water as well as on energy-rich fertilizers. Hydropower is a significant source of energy for some regions while new sources of energy—such as biofuels—threaten to exacerbate the potential for food shortages. There is as much scope for negative tradeoffs as there is the potential for positive synergies. Agricultural productivity in Africa, particularly, will require a sea change to avoid shortages. Unlike Asia and South America, which have achieved significant improvements in agricultural production per capita, Africa has only recently returned to 1970s’ levels.

i disagree, you are headed for scarcities if people keep on eating meat and farming animals for worldwide consumption. more land are use for animal farming and hunger and poverty will not cease if meat-eating is still the dominant diet.

alternative green energy can be adopted to curb carbon release. all these can be done to solve such planetary destruction problems.


i am surprise that he didn't mentioned the trend of more people adopting a vegetarian and vegan diet. This author must be a low life meat-eating loser.
 
i disagree, you are headed for scarcities if people keep on eating meat and farming animals for worldwide consumption. more land are use for animal farming and hunger and poverty will not cease if meat-eating is still the dominant diet.

alternative green energy can be adopted to curb carbon release. all these can be done to solve such planetary destruction problems.


i am surprise that he didn't mentioned the trend of more people adopting a vegetarian and vegan diet. This author must be a low life meat-eating loser.

It is pretty obvious how shallow you are and I suggest you don't make comments about things you are ignorant of. Also, you shoot your mouth off without reading the report properly or doing some research of your own. Who are you to give advice and saying "This author must be a low life meat-eating loser. "

You know fuck all about the National Intelligence Council, and assume this is a report made by one person. Let me enlighten you although it is a waste of time.

"The NIC’s National Intelligence Officers — drawn from government, academia, and the private sector—are the Intelligence Community’s senior experts on a range of regional and functional issues. "

In other words, a global think tank and you have the audacity to say they are a "low life meat-eating loser."

:oIo: arsehole!
 
Last edited:
It is pretty obvious how shallow you are and I suggest you don't make comments about things you are ignorant of. Also, you shoot your mouth off without reading or doing some research of your own. Who are you to give advice and saying "This author must be a low life meat-eating loser. "

You know fuck all about the National Intelligence Council, and assume this is a report made by one person. Let me enlighten you although it is a waste of time.

"The NIC’s National Intelligence Officers — drawn from government, academia, and the private sector—are the Intelligence Community’s senior experts on a range of regional and functional issues. "

In other words, a global think tank and you have the audacity to say they are a "low life meat-eating loser."

:mad: arsehole!

then fucking hell dun read my post. put me on your ignore list..i can post whatever i like and say whatever i want, if you dun fucking like it, then dun fucking read it!!!
 
then fucking hell dun read my post. put me on your ignore list..i can post whatever i like and say whatever i want, if you dun fucking like it, then dun fucking read it!!!

Then don't come and comment if you know nothing you twit!
 
Then don't come and comment if you know nothing you twit!

i can comment and post whatever i want, but you can dun read it and put me in your ignore list. you dunno how to do that?? must be a sinkie dumfucked shit.
 
i can comment and post whatever i want, but you can dun read it and put me in your ignore list. you dunno how to do that?? must be a sinkie dumfucked shit.

I repeat, don't come into my threads and post nonsense, comprende? Get that into your numbskull.
 
I repeat, don't come into my threads and post nonsense, comprende? Get that into your numbskull.

i will post whenever i want and if it is your thread, then you just go to one corner and suck your own thumb and get a cactus and upz your own ass.
 
Back
Top