- Joined
- Apr 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,463
- Points
- 48
An insightful article from TR Emeritus
MRT Fiasco – Blame who?
December 18th, 2011 | Author: Contributions
PAP’s self-proclaimed first world public transport, the MRT train, malfunctioned in three separate instances in less than a week for the first time since its inception in 1987. Media reports both online and mainstream have covered extensively on the faults and Singaporeans get to catch a glimpse of how riots could be felt like – public blackout, mass gathering scenes, frustrated people and broken window panes.
Leaving the train fault aside, SMRT also proven themselves to be incapable of handling contingencies. The shuttle bus service provided were not able to accommodate the number of commuters. SMRT’s other arm, the taxi operations, insensitively sent out an announcement notice to all taxi drivers calling the train breakdown incident: “Income Opportunities”.
The question remains to see whose head should be on the chopping board to account for these chaos. Who and what are the factors responsible?
1) SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa
Number 1 on the target board. One of the most well-paid CEO in the region ($1.8 million) angered Singaporeans with callous remarks on several occasions. Given such major screw-ups, if Saw still doesn’t go, it will only tell how greedy and unprincipled Singapore’s corporate system has become.
The PAP ruling Government, through the controlling shareholder, the state-owned Temasek Holdings, may just force Saw to resign from SMRT so as to ensure that the buck stops at her level.
Also, as the Malaysian CEO is not a PAP member, the PAP leadership will have no qualms distancing themselves from her. The state-owned media is already joining in the public outcries calling for her resignation. The question remains who will be the next SMRT CEO?
2) PAP Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew
Taking over one of the most difficult ministries, Singapore’s Transport system has been a mess since Raymond Lim’s time. Aside from getting on cameras featuring how he has been “helping” commuters and paying lips services over the media, Lui has so far been a no show. Unlike Lui’s counterpart who took over a similar difficult profile, Minister Khaw Boon Wan has at least been seen trying his best to institute new housing policies, with the notable ones like reducing the price of new HDBs, increasing new HDB constructions and slamming an extra 10% stamp duty on foreign home buyers. Lui pales in comparison as he does not see any problems with the current policies and looks more interested in maintaining the status quo and appearing in public riding public transport.
Under Lui’s watch, public transport operators’ applications for public transport fare raise were given the green light with zero discussions and public feedback. Car ownership to foreign buyers saw no levies and the prices of Certificate of Entitlement (COEs) reached new heights. Private ownership of taxi and buses are still being disallowed when it is clear that the SBS and SMRT monopolies are unable to meet demand.
3) Influx of Foreigners
The 24 year old MRT train system was well-known for its reliability in the past and was an exclusive bragging tool of the ruling PAP Govt. However in the recent years, due to PAP’s relentless intake of foreigners, every train was fully loaded and train frequencies were increased to the maximum limit in the past 6 years. Operating at maximum load every day, it is only a matter of time before the system faces an engineering death.
4) Consumer Commission of Singapore(CCS)
This Statutory Board has proven itself to be totally useless when it comes to charging NTUC-arm National Taxis Association’s call to price-fix taxi fares. Fare prices of public transport are still dictated by the few PAP-approved companies and there is certainly no open economy concept in Singapore public transport.
Alex Tan
http://www.tremeritus.com/2011/12/18/43647/
MRT Fiasco – Blame who?
December 18th, 2011 | Author: Contributions
PAP’s self-proclaimed first world public transport, the MRT train, malfunctioned in three separate instances in less than a week for the first time since its inception in 1987. Media reports both online and mainstream have covered extensively on the faults and Singaporeans get to catch a glimpse of how riots could be felt like – public blackout, mass gathering scenes, frustrated people and broken window panes.
Leaving the train fault aside, SMRT also proven themselves to be incapable of handling contingencies. The shuttle bus service provided were not able to accommodate the number of commuters. SMRT’s other arm, the taxi operations, insensitively sent out an announcement notice to all taxi drivers calling the train breakdown incident: “Income Opportunities”.
The question remains to see whose head should be on the chopping board to account for these chaos. Who and what are the factors responsible?
1) SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa
Number 1 on the target board. One of the most well-paid CEO in the region ($1.8 million) angered Singaporeans with callous remarks on several occasions. Given such major screw-ups, if Saw still doesn’t go, it will only tell how greedy and unprincipled Singapore’s corporate system has become.
The PAP ruling Government, through the controlling shareholder, the state-owned Temasek Holdings, may just force Saw to resign from SMRT so as to ensure that the buck stops at her level.
Also, as the Malaysian CEO is not a PAP member, the PAP leadership will have no qualms distancing themselves from her. The state-owned media is already joining in the public outcries calling for her resignation. The question remains who will be the next SMRT CEO?
2) PAP Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew
Taking over one of the most difficult ministries, Singapore’s Transport system has been a mess since Raymond Lim’s time. Aside from getting on cameras featuring how he has been “helping” commuters and paying lips services over the media, Lui has so far been a no show. Unlike Lui’s counterpart who took over a similar difficult profile, Minister Khaw Boon Wan has at least been seen trying his best to institute new housing policies, with the notable ones like reducing the price of new HDBs, increasing new HDB constructions and slamming an extra 10% stamp duty on foreign home buyers. Lui pales in comparison as he does not see any problems with the current policies and looks more interested in maintaining the status quo and appearing in public riding public transport.
Under Lui’s watch, public transport operators’ applications for public transport fare raise were given the green light with zero discussions and public feedback. Car ownership to foreign buyers saw no levies and the prices of Certificate of Entitlement (COEs) reached new heights. Private ownership of taxi and buses are still being disallowed when it is clear that the SBS and SMRT monopolies are unable to meet demand.
3) Influx of Foreigners
The 24 year old MRT train system was well-known for its reliability in the past and was an exclusive bragging tool of the ruling PAP Govt. However in the recent years, due to PAP’s relentless intake of foreigners, every train was fully loaded and train frequencies were increased to the maximum limit in the past 6 years. Operating at maximum load every day, it is only a matter of time before the system faces an engineering death.
4) Consumer Commission of Singapore(CCS)
This Statutory Board has proven itself to be totally useless when it comes to charging NTUC-arm National Taxis Association’s call to price-fix taxi fares. Fare prices of public transport are still dictated by the few PAP-approved companies and there is certainly no open economy concept in Singapore public transport.
Alex Tan
http://www.tremeritus.com/2011/12/18/43647/