• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Monday, Putin & Xijinping Joint Naval War Game!

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-04-25/doc-ihvhiewr8173978.shtml

中俄29日起举行海上联合军演 出动15艘舰艇11架飞机

2019年04月25日 15:11 国防部网站



0

s5lM-hvvuiyn9797704.jpg

2019年4月国防部例行记者会
发布人:国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人任国强大校
根据中俄双方达成的共识,中俄两国海军将于4月29日至5月4日在中国山东青岛附近海空域举行代号为“海上联合-2019”的联合军事演习。这次海上联演的课题是“海上联合防卫行动”,中俄双方共出动潜艇2艘、水面舰艇13艘、固定翼飞机7架、直升机4架和陆战队员80人参演,演习分为联合行动筹划准备、海上联合行动实施、总结闭幕三个阶段。此次联演旨在巩固发展中俄全面战略协作伙伴关系,深化两军友好务实合作,增强两国海军共同应对海上安全威胁的能力。演习不针对第三方。
在习主席和普京总统的战略引领下,中俄两军关系持续保持高位运行,不断为两国全面战略协作伙伴关系充实新的时代内涵和安全内涵,不断为维护世界和平和地区稳定提供正能量。今年,中俄两军还将持续推进各领域交流合作,在高层交往、实战化训练、国际军事比赛等领域深入合作。

点击进入专题:
人民海军70周年海上阅兵举行 我国防部就近期热点答记者问 每日军情TOP5




Sino-Russian joint military exercise at sea on the 29th, dispatching 15 ships and 11 aircraft
April 25, 2019 15:11 Department of Defense website
0

Regular press conference of the Ministry of National Defense in April 2019

Publisher: Deputy Director of the Information Department of the Ministry of National Defense, and spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense Ren Guoqiang School

According to the consensus reached between China and Russia, the Chinese and Russian navies will hold a joint military exercise codenamed "Sea Joint-2019" in the sea and airspace near Qingdao, Shandong, China from April 29 to May 4. The topic of this maritime joint performance was "Sea Joint Defence Operation". China and Russia jointly dispatched 2 submarines, 13 surface ships, 7 fixed-wing aircraft, 4 helicopters and 80 Marines. The exercises were divided into exercises. Joint action planning preparation, implementation of joint maritime operations, and summary of the three phases. The joint performance aims to consolidate the development of China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of cooperation, deepen the friendly and pragmatic cooperation between the two militaries, and enhance the ability of the two navies to jointly respond to maritime security threats. The exercise is not directed at third parties.

Under the leadership of President Xi and President Putin's strategy, the relations between the Chinese and Russian armed forces continue to maintain a high level of operation, and continue to enrich the new era's connotation and security connotation for the comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership between the two countries, and continue to provide positive energy for maintaining world peace and regional stability. . This year, the Chinese and Russian armed forces will continue to promote exchanges and cooperation in various fields and cooperate in high-level exchanges, practical training, and international military competitions.
Click to enter the topic:
The 70th anniversary of the People's Navy, the military parade was held. The Ministry of Defense of the People's Republic of China answered questions about the recent hot spots. Daily Military TOP5
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/jssd/2019-04-25/doc-ihvhiewr8243727.shtml

德国中将问中国今年服役多少军舰 我军:一打左右吧

2019年04月25日 21:24 新浪军事



0

对于应邀而来的各国海军代表团而言,此次中国海军建军七十周年的活动,亦是一个极好的增进互相交流和彼此了解的绝佳平台。
owxI-hvvuiyp0308959.jpg

观摩阅兵的外国代表
除了台上人民海军威武雄壮的受阅舰艇编队对外所展现出来崭新面貌以外,来访各国海军代表与我国海军人员在私下交流时所传出的一些趣闻,同样可以在一定程度上反映出目前中国海军在国际上的地位与形象。这当中最有意思的,莫过于德国海军代表团团长,安德烈亚斯·克劳泽(Andreas Krause)中将在参加完海上阅兵仪式后,在其国内社交媒体平台上发布的一则趣闻。
R3Lw-hvvuiyp0308976.jpg

此次活动给了中外各国海军一个极好的互相了解的机会
j5fV-hvvuiyp0309001.jpg

在研讨会上发言的安德烈亚斯·克劳泽海军中将
时任德国海军参谋长的安德烈亚斯·克劳泽中将在社交媒体上称,他在活动期间,也就是观摩阅兵式之后忍不住向中方陪同军官提出了一个问题,“你们今年要服役多少艘新型军舰?”,中方陪同军官愣了一下,显然没想到对方会直接打听这么敏感的信息,因此只能给个大概的答案,克劳泽中将最后得到的答复是:“我不太清楚。。。。。。大概一打(12条以上)左右吧”。此条消息在一经披露后,就立即引起了外界的广泛讨论。对此,就有一些国内网友调侃道,咱们今年准备服役的这一打军舰其实不算多,差不多也就一个德国海军而已。。。。
wDRC-hvvuiyp0309029.jpg

安德烈亚斯·克劳泽海军中将在看完阅兵式后忍不住向陪同军官发问,得到的回答也让他感叹不已
尽管网友的这种调侃看起来有着过分自信的嫌疑,但本着实事求是的精神计算一下,其实一年服役一个德国海军的说法并没有任何的夸张。要知道我国海军已连续5年占据了全球海军下水吨位排行榜榜首的位置。单以2018年的数据为例,我国在这短短一年之内,军用舰艇下水总吨位就突破了20万吨的大关。这当中大多数为055型大型驱逐舰、052D型驱逐舰、071型综合登陆舰、056A型轻型护卫舰等水面舰艇中的主战型号,可谓含金量十足。
Dbpd-hvvuiyp0309053.jpg

15艘盾舰同框开建足以说明我国舰艇产能的恐怖
前阵子引起了热议的江南长兴岛造船厂同时开工建造15艘盾舰的盛况,同样说明了我国舰艇产能的恐怖。正所谓没有对比就没有伤害,相比我国海军“下饺子”般的暴兵速度,德国海军在刚刚过去的2018年间,却没有下水任何一艘排水量超过2000吨的军用舰艇。网上公开资料显示,德国海军截至目前共装备有1艘F-125型“符腾堡”级护卫舰、3艘F-124型“萨克森”级护卫舰,4艘F-123型“勃兰登堡”级护卫舰,2艘F-122型“不莱梅”级护卫舰等共计10艘主战水面舰艇。
FpUZ-hvvuiyp0309078.jpg

德国海军是典型的中等规模发达国家海军,现役总吨位与我国2018年下水舰艇总吨位相当
再算上6艘212型潜艇、6艘“布伦瑞克”级轻型护卫舰以及若干扫雷、补给等军辅船后,德国海军的总吨位维持在20万吨的级别,基本与我国海军整个2018年的下水舰艇吨位数相当。就是这堪堪20万吨级的总吨位规模,依旧使德国海军在西欧各国海军排名中占据比较前列的位置。由此可见,近几年来我国军迷所表述的中国海军每年开工、下水、服役一支中等国家海军力量的现状所言非虚。
bLXd-hvvuiyp0309099.jpg

克劳泽中将拍摄的055型南昌舰的照片,阅兵舰艇规模给他带来了不小的冲击
我们很难得知安德烈亚斯·克劳泽海军中将得到中方人员回答时内心中的真实想法,或许是五味杂陈,或许是纯粹的羡慕。不过可以肯定的是,我国海军陪访人员在略微迟疑之后所给出的这个回答,必然将让这位老欧洲海军高级将领对正在迈步实现装备现代化的中国海军,有着更加全面和深刻的认识。(作者署名:啮花熊 )


Lieutenant General of Germany asked how many warships China will serve this year. Our army: A dozen or so.
April 25, 2019 21:24 Sina Military
0

For the naval delegations invited, the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Chinese Navy is also an excellent platform for enhancing mutual exchanges and mutual understanding.

Foreign representatives who observe the military parade

In addition to the new appearance of the mighty and powerful fleet of people in the Taichung People’s Navy, some interesting stories from local naval representatives and Chinese naval personnel in private exchanges can also reflect the current Chinese navy to some extent. Status and image in the international arena. The most interesting of these is an anecdote published by the head of the German naval delegation, Lieutenant General Andreas Krause, on his domestic social media platform after attending the maritime military parade. .

The event gave Chinese and foreign navies an excellent opportunity to understand each other.

Admiral Andreas Krause, speaking at the seminar

Lieutenant General Andreas Krause, then the Chief of Staff of the German Navy, said on social media that he couldn’t help but ask the Chinese military officer during the event, that is, after watching the military parade, "You are this year. How many new warships do you have to serve?” The Chinese accompanied the officers and stunned. Obviously, I didn’t expect the other party to directly ask such sensitive information, so I could only give a rough answer. The last reply that Lieutenant Clauze got was: “I Not very clear. . . . probably about a dozen (more than 12). Once this information was disclosed, it immediately caused widespread discussion. In this regard, some domestic netizens ridiculed that the warships we are preparing to serve this year are actually not much, almost a German navy. . . .

After watching the military parade, Lieutenant General Andreas Krause couldn’t help but ask the accompanying officer. The answer he got also made him lament.

Although this kind of ridicule of netizens seems to be overly confident, it is calculated in the spirit of seeking truth from facts. In fact, there is no exaggeration in the statement of serving a German navy in one year. We must know that our navy has occupied the top spot in the global naval tonnage ranking for five consecutive years. Taking the data of 2018 as an example, in this short period of one year, the total tonnage of military ships launched has exceeded 200,000 tons. Most of these are the main battle models in the surface ships such as the 055 large destroyer, the 052D destroyer, the 071 type integrated landing ship, and the 056A light frigate, which can be described as full of gold.

The construction of 15 shield ships in the same frame is enough to illustrate the horror of China’s ship production capacity.

A while ago, the Jiangnan Changxing Island Shipyard, which was hotly debated, started the construction of 15 shield ships at the same time, which also illustrated the horror of China's ship production capacity. As the saying goes, there is no harm without comparison. Compared with the violent speed of the Chinese Navy’s “dumplings”, the German Navy did not launch any military ship with a displacement of more than 2,000 tons in the past 2018. According to online public information, the German Navy has been equipped with one F-125 "Württemberg" class frigate, three F-124 "Saxon" class frigates and four F-123 type "Brandenburg". Level frigates, 2 F-122 "Bremen" class frigates and a total of 10 main battle surface ships.

The German Navy is a typical medium-sized developed country navy. The total tonnage of active duty is equivalent to the total tonnage of launched ships in China in 2018.

After counting six 212 submarines, six "Brunridge" class light frigates and several military auxiliary vessels such as minesweeping and resupply, the total tonnage of the German Navy is maintained at 200,000 tons, basically with the entire 2018 of the Chinese Navy. The tonnage of the launching ships of the year is equivalent. It is the size of the total tonnage of 200,000 tons, which still makes the German Navy occupy the leading position in the ranking of the Western European countries. It can be seen from this that in the past few years, the status quo of the Chinese navy that the Chinese navy has expressed, starting, launching, and serving a naval force in a medium-sized country, is not empty.

The photograph of the 055 Nanchang ship photographed by Lieutenant General Klauze, the size of the parade ship brought him a big impact.

It is difficult for us to know the true thoughts of the confessor Andreas Krause in the heart of the Chinese people’s response. Perhaps it is a mixture of miscellaneous and perhaps pure envy. What is certain, however, is that the answer given by the Chinese navy’s accompanying personnel after a slight hesitation will inevitably give the old European Navy’s senior generals a more comprehensive and profound understanding of the Chinese navy, which is modernizing its equipment. (Author's signature: Bear)
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-04-25/doc-ihvhiewr8245039.shtml

外媒惊叹中国海军发展速度 至少15艘大型驱逐舰在建

2019年04月25日 21:32 参考消息



0

LW07-hvvuiyp0051323.jpg

中国海军055型导弹驱逐舰“南昌”号4月23日参加海上阅兵。(路透社)
美国商业内幕网站4月23日发表了题为《中国在大规模展示海军实力时展示新型驱逐舰》的报道。在4月23日举行的中国人民解放军海军成立70周年庆祝活动上,中国展示了一款新型海军武器——新一代主力驱逐舰中的第一艘。
青岛海上阅兵活动期间,排水量超过1万吨的“南昌”号(舷号101)055型隐身导弹驱逐舰驶向现场。
报道称,该舰装备有112单元垂直发射系统(VLS),能够发射“海红旗”-9远程舰空导弹、“鹰击”-18反舰巡航导弹和“长剑”-10对陆攻击巡航导弹。主炮是一门130毫米口径的H/PJ-38型舰炮。但有报道称,这艘驱逐舰最终可能配备一门电磁轨道炮。该舰使用X波段和S波段有源相控阵雷达,使其能够跟踪各种大小的飞行物或舰艇。
从技术上来说,这艘驱逐舰大到足以被归类为巡洋舰,其有效载荷能力(载弹量)落后于美国海军的提康德罗加级巡洋舰,却超过了阿利·伯克级驱逐舰,后者只有96单元的垂直发射系统。据说“南昌”号驱逐舰的主要竞争对手是朱姆沃尔特级隐身驱逐舰,后者仍然面临各种开发问题。
外媒认为,4月23日在阅舰式上公开亮相表明该驱逐舰已经做好战斗准备。
R8cM-hitesuz5760203.jpg

中国2艘055型大型驱逐舰同时下水资料图。
报道称,055型驱逐舰的其余几艘也在建造中。第二艘055型驱逐舰于2018年4月下水,另外两艘于当年7月下水。像“南昌”号一样,这些驱逐舰预计最终将成为中国新兴航母编队全副武装的护卫舰只。
共有32艘舰艇和39架战机参加了中国的海上阅兵活动。在接受检阅的其他舰艇中,有一艘是中国晋级(094型)弹道导弹核潜艇的改良版。中国还展示了一款新型常规潜艇。
中国海军现代化受到华盛顿的密切关注。美国陆军、海军和海军陆战队都在越来越多地关注反制中国舰队所需的反舰武器,在中国加强军力之际,这种武器是必要的。
另据俄罗斯卫星通讯社网站4月22日报道称,实施战略威慑并确保中国的全球利益正在成为新的任务,它们在越来越大的程度上决定了中国海军今天的面貌。
俄媒推测,已经开始的“巨浪”-3型潜射弹道导弹测试的完成将导致大批更强大的新型核潜艇服役,并进一步巩固中国在潜艇方面继美俄之后第三的位置。可以预期,中国将来有望上升到世界第二位,仅次于美国——建造中国核潜艇的渤海造船厂最近几年的大规模扩建,就可以说明这种计划的存在。
422o-hvvuiyp0051592.jpg

参加4月23日海上阅舰式的中国海军战略核潜艇。(新华网)
报道称,中国暂时在核潜艇隐蔽性(安静性)方面仍然落后于俄罗斯和美国。但毫无疑问,将主要资源用于解决这个问题之后,迟早会出成果。
最令人印象深刻的是中国水面舰队的发展速度。上海江南造船厂最新照片显示,至少有15艘052D型和055型大型驱逐舰处于不同建造阶段。类似的舰队发展速度现在即使美国也难以达到。
俄媒指出,中国正在建造现代化且功能强大的军舰,为其配备多功能有源相控阵雷达、多功能垂发装置和多功能武器火控系统。它们携带强大的防空系统和巡航导弹。自21世纪初以来,中国舰队已经积累了丰富的远航经验,并拥有大量能够支持海军在全球行动的大型快速综合补给舰。
中国航母数量的进一步增加、第一艘多用途登陆舰的建造以及海军陆战队兵力的提升,将使中国军队能够出现在全球任何地方并开展有效的军事行动,并对中国利益和具有重要战略意义的海上运输进行保护。
尽管中国在发展海军武器方面取得重大成功,但俄罗斯在生产某些类型的海军武器和装备——例如反舰导弹、防空系统和潜艇——方面仍然保持一定优势,并积极与中国合作发展海军。这种合作符合共同利益,今后还将继续下去。

点击进入专题:
人民海军70周年海上阅兵举行


Foreign media marvel at the speed of development of the Chinese navy. At least 15 large destroyers are under construction.
April 25, 2019 21:32 Reference message
0

The Chinese Navy 055 guided missile destroyer "Nanchang" participated in the military parade on April 23. (Reuters)

The US business insider website published a report on April 23rd entitled "China Shows New Destroyer in Large-Scale Display of Naval Strength." At the celebration of the 70th anniversary of the establishment of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy on April 23, China presented a new type of naval weapon - the first of a new generation of main destroyers.

During the Qingdao military parade, the “Nanchang” (Ship No. 101) Type 055 stealth guided missile destroyer with a displacement of more than 10,000 tons sailed to the scene.

The report said that the ship is equipped with 112 units of vertical launch system (VLS), capable of launching "Haihongqi"-9 long-range ship-to-air missile, "Eagle"-18 anti-ship cruise missile and "Long Sword"-10 land attack cruise missile. The main gun is a 130mm H/PJ-38 gun. However, there are reports that the destroyer may eventually be equipped with an electromagnetic railgun. The ship uses X-band and S-band active phased array radars to enable it to track flying objects or ships of all sizes.

Technically, the destroyer is large enough to be classified as a cruiser, and its payload capacity (load capacity) lags behind the US Navy's Ticondero-class cruiser, but surpasses the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer. There is only 96 units of vertical launch system. It is said that the main competitor of the "Nanchang" destroyer is the Zumwalt stealth destroyer, which still faces various development problems.

The foreign media believes that the public appearance on the ship-reading style on April 23 indicates that the destroyer is ready for battle.

China's two 055 frigates were launched at the same time.

According to reports, the remaining ships of the Type 055 destroyer are also under construction. The second 055 destroyer was launched in April 2018, and the other two were launched in July of that year. Like the "Nanchang", these destroyers are expected to eventually become fully armed frigates for China's emerging aircraft carrier formation.

A total of 32 ships and 39 fighters participated in the Chinese military parade. Among the other ships under review, one is a modified version of China's advanced (094 type) ballistic missile submarine. China has also demonstrated a new type of conventional submarine.

The modernization of the Chinese navy has been closely watched by Washington. The US Army, Navy, and Marine Corps are increasingly paying attention to the anti-ship weapons needed to counter the Chinese fleet. This weapon is necessary as China strengthens its military power.

According to a report on the website of the Russian Satellite News Agency on April 22, the implementation of strategic deterrence and ensuring that China's global interests are becoming a new task, they determine the face of the Chinese navy to a greater and greater extent today.

The Russian media speculated that the completion of the "Julang"-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile test will lead to the inauguration of a large number of more powerful new nuclear submarines, and further consolidate China's third position in the submarine after the United States and Russia. It can be expected that China will rise to the second place in the world in the future, second only to the United States - the large-scale expansion of the Bohai Shipyard that built China's nuclear submarines in recent years can illustrate the existence of such a plan.

Participated in the Chinese naval strategic nuclear submarine on the sea on the 23rd. (Xinhua)

According to reports, China is still lagging behind Russia and the United States for the hidden (quietness) of nuclear submarines. But there is no doubt that sooner or later, the main resources will be used to solve this problem.

The most impressive is the speed of development of the Chinese surface fleet. The latest photos of the Shanghai Jiangnan Shipyard show that at least 15 052D and 055 frigates are at different stages of construction. The speed of similar fleet development is now difficult to achieve even in the United States.

The Russian media pointed out that China is building a modern and powerful warship with multi-functional active phased array radar, multi-function slinging device and multi-function weapon fire control system. They carry powerful air defense systems and cruise missiles. Since the beginning of the 21st century, the Chinese fleet has accumulated rich experience in voyages and has a large number of large-scale rapid integrated supply ships capable of supporting the Navy's global operations.

The further increase in the number of Chinese aircraft carriers, the construction of the first multi-purpose landing ship and the advancement of the Marine Corps will enable the Chinese military to appear anywhere in the world and carry out effective military operations, and have important strategic significance for China’s interests. Maritime transport for protection.

Despite China's significant success in developing naval weapons, Russia still maintains certain advantages in producing certain types of naval weapons and equipment, such as anti-ship missiles, air defense systems and submarines, and is actively cooperating with China to develop the navy. This cooperation is in the common interest and will continue in the future.
Click to enter the topic:
The 70th anniversary of the People's Navy held at the military parade
 

tun_dr_m

Alfrescian
Loyal

USA believe that WW3 will start around Taiwan in their own war games!


https://mil.news.sina.com.cn/china/2019-04-25/doc-ihvhiqax4992908.shtml


台媒称美推演第3次世界大战台湾战场 网友:那是桌游

2019年04月25日 15:56 环球时报



0

“美军推演第三次世界大战台湾战场?”台网友:那不是桌游吗?
岛内绿媒《自由时报》24日报道了美国军校的一次沙盘推演活动,提及“第三次世界大战台湾战场这样打”说法。但有网友发现此次推演使用的道具是桌游,也有人批评称,这次推演纯属想象,不能当真,“战争没有赢家”。
这篇报道4月24日刊登在《自由时报》,题为:“美陆战队大学兵推 第三次世界大战台湾战场这样打…”↓
_WDV-hvvuiyn9860320.jpg

此事的由头是美国海军陆战队大学海军陆战队战争学院22日举办的“第三次世界大战模拟兵推(沙盘推演)”。《自由时报》称,推演的主要战场在欧洲、朝鲜半岛、台湾,而美国在推演中的“敌人”则为中国、俄罗斯、朝鲜组成的联军。
提及台湾地区的所谓“战争情况”时,报道称“台湾军队”会有美国空军、美国海军、日本自卫队“支援”,甚至还装模作样地用上这样的描述:台军“需独自在地面上与已登陆的解放军作战”;日本“担心台湾落入中国”。
-FEw-hvvuiyn9860328.jpg

为什么说绿媒装模作样?因为在这篇报道刊出后不久,就有眼尖的台湾网友发现,报道配图中出现的沙盘推演道具其实是一款桌上游戏,“那是桌游啦”。↓
tHX8-hvvuiyn9860337.png

点开这位网友提供的链接,环环确实发现一款桌游的页面,上面写着其名字“下一战争:台湾”。此物系一款把“台湾地区开战”当背景的桌游,出品方为“GMT Games”↓
-PKX-hvvuiyn9860344.jpg

这次“第三次世界大战”推演是不是真如网友所说用是桌游来做的?《自由时报》的报道已给了环环验证的方法:文章提及,这次军演的信息和照片系出自美国的一个名为“石头上的战争” (War on the Rocks)的“外交政策网站”↓
fJ5i-hvvuiyn9860353.jpg

环环查询“石头上的战争”原报道,发现其是这么介绍这次所谓“沙盘推演”过程的:6组学生参加,每组5人,三组扮演“红队”,另外三组扮演“蓝队”……
pKmF-hvvuiyn9860364.jpg
至于推演所使用的道具,文章更是标注出了其名字:“GMT下一战争”系列。↓
z3xW-hvvuiyn9860376.jpg

文章还在桌游的名字上给了相关链接,点击之后进入的果然是厂商“GMT”的网页,其列出的桌游也包含“下一战争:台湾”。
XPwE-hvvuiyn9860385.jpg

原来,被绿媒用来把“第三次世界大战”和“台湾战场”联系到一起的这次沙盘推演,真的是美国学生拿桌游搞出来的。
cNdA-hvvuiyn9860398.jpg

在西方军事史上,确实曾有用桌面游戏进行沙盘推演的例子,也确实有岛内网友在绿媒此番炒作“第三次世界大战”后被吓到。↓
-7YU-hvvuiyn9860410.jpg

gFE0-hvvuiyn9860416.png

不过,当发现推演是学校里面的学生做出来的之后,不少网友都对这次推演表示质疑。有人认为这只是学校课程,也有人说这次设定不太符合现实,“结果和过程根本不重要,因为不是美国国防部的兵推”。↓
62uN-hvvuiyn9860429.jpg

CPIh-hvvuiyn9860440.jpg

MIWf-hvvuiyn9860454.jpg
更有网友批评称,这种推演就是纯属想象,如果当真就是病了。
Qzus-hvvuiyn9860470.jpg

在6组美国学生的用桌游进行“角色扮演”后,这场沙盘推演的结果是美国赢得“第三次世界大战”。《自由时报》称,推演中的美军与“盟国军队”在波兰、朝鲜半岛、台湾的战斗中损失15万名士兵,“相当于第一次世界大战的消耗兵力”。
然而,对这种用学生“红蓝队”扮演活动来煞有介事宣扬“战争”的报道,岛内网友在《自由时报》文章中批评:战争没有赢家。
041w-hvvuiyn9860486.jpg
更有人对所谓“台湾战场”说法嗤之以鼻:还好我不用当炮灰了。↓
cBC8-hvvuiyn9860502.jpg
还有人说,阵亡“15万人”的说法就是为了找美国政府要经费。↓
dwOB-hvvuiyn9860522.jpg

dn4j-hvvuiyn9860536.jpg


Taiwanese media said that the United States deducted the 3rd World War Taiwan battlefield. Netizen: It was a board game.
April 25, 2019 15:56 Global Times
0

"The US military deduced the battlefield of the Third World War in Taiwan?" Taiwanese netizen: Isn't that a board game?

On the 24th, the green media "Free Times" reported on the sand table deduction of the US military academy, referring to the "three-world war in Taiwan battlefield". However, some netizens found that the props used in this deduction were board games. Some people also criticized that this deduction is purely imaginary and cannot be taken seriously. "There is no winner in the war."

The report was published in the Free Times on April 24th, entitled: "The US Marine Corps University Forces Push the Third World War in the Taiwan Battlefield..."

The head of the incident was the "World War I Simulated Push (Dashboard Deduction)" organized by the US Marine Corps Marine Corps War College on the 22nd. The "Free Times" said that the main battlefields in the deduction were in Europe, the Korean Peninsula, and Taiwan, while the "enemy" in the United States was a coalition of China, Russia, and North Korea.

When referring to the so-called "war situation" in Taiwan, the report said that the "Taiwan Army" would have "support" from the US Air Force, the US Navy, and the Japanese Self-Defense Force. It even used a description like this: The Taiwan Army "is required to be alone on the ground. Fighting with the PLA that has already landed; Japan is "worried about Taiwan falling into China."

Why do you say green media? Because shortly after the publication of this report, Taiwanese netizens who had pointed eyes found that the sandbox props appearing in the report were actually a table game. "That is a board game." ↓

Clicking on the link provided by this netizen, the ring does find a page of a board game with the name "Next War: Taiwan". This is a board game with the background of "Taiwan Wars". The producer is "GMT Games"↓

Is this "World War III" deduction really like a netizen saying that it is a board game? The Free Times report has given the way to the ring verification: the article mentioned that the information and photos of the military exercise were from a foreign policy called "War on the Rocks" in the United States. Website"↓

The original report of the "War on the Stone" was found in the ring and found that it introduced the so-called "sand disc deduction" process: 6 groups of students participated, each group consisted of 5 people, three groups played the "red team" and the other three groups played " Blue team"...
As for the props used in the deduction, the article also marked its name: "GMT next war" series. As for the props used in the deduction, the article also marked its name: "GMT next war" series. ↓

The article also gave relevant links on the name of the board game. After clicking, it turned out to be the page of the manufacturer "GMT". The listed table games also included "Next War: Taiwan".

It turned out that this sand table deduction, which was used by the green media to link the "World War III" and the "Taiwan battlefield", was really made by American students with a tabletop game.

In the history of Western military affairs, there have been examples of using table games for sand table deduction. It is true that netizens on the island were scared after the "three world wars" of the green media. ↓

However, after discovering that the deduction was made by the students in the school, many netizens questioned the deduction. Some people think that this is only a school curriculum, and some people say that this setting is not in line with reality. "The results and the process are not important at all, because it is not the US Department of Defense." ↓
Some netizens have criticized that this kind of deduction is purely imaginary, if it is really ill. Some netizens have criticized that this kind of deduction is purely imaginary, if it is really ill.

After the "role play" of the six groups of American students using table games, the result of this sand table deduction was that the United States won the "World War III." The Free Times said that the US military and the "Allied Army" in the deduction lost 150,000 soldiers in the battles of Poland, the Korean Peninsula and Taiwan, "equivalent to the consumption of the First World War."

However, for this kind of report that students use the "red and blue team" to play an activity to promote "war", netizens in the island criticized in the "Free Times" article: there is no winner in the war.
Some people even sneered at the so-called "Taiwan battlefield": Fortunately, I don't have to be a cannon fodder. Some people even sneered at the so-called "Taiwan battlefield": Fortunately, I don't have to be a cannon fodder. ↓
Others said that the death of "150,000 people" is to find the US government to fund. There are still people who say that the death of "150,000 people" is to find the US government to fund. ↓
 
Top