• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Ministers K Shanmugam, Tan See Leng awarded S$230,000 each for defamation by Bloomberg, reporter

DaoMa

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
32,055
Points
113

Ministers K Shanmugam, Tan See Leng awarded S$230,000 each for defamation by Bloomberg, reporter​

Ministers K Shanmugam, Tan See Leng awarded S$230,000 each for defamation by Bloomberg, reporter

Bloomberg reporter Low De Wei (centre) arriving at the Supreme Court on May 22, 2026. (Photo: CNA/Ooi Boon Keong)



Lydia Lam

14 Jul 2026 04:09PM


Set CNA as your preferred source on Google

SINGAPORE: A court has awarded Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam and Manpower Minister Tan See Leng damages of S$230,000 (US$177,874) each for defamation by news organisation Bloomberg and its reporter, Mr Low De Wei.

In a judgment released on Tuesday (Jul 14), Justice Audrey Lim found that the December 2024 article about secretive Good Class Bungalow (GCB) transactions had defamed the ministers.

She rejected Bloomberg's argument that the article merely examined a broader trend of non-caveated GCB transactions, and that the ministers were cited only as examples.

Instead, she said the article, when read as a whole, linked the ministers' transactions with claims about secrecy, opacity and money laundering, creating a defamatory impression.

Justice Lim also rejected Bloomberg's reliance on a public interest defence known as the Reynolds defence in UK law, saying it is not part of Singapore law.

Even if it were available, the judge found that Bloomberg would not have satisfied the standard of responsible journalism and that the ministers were not given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations ultimately published.

Bloomberg and Mr Low are jointly and severally liable for the defamation, which means they are collectively responsible for the entire sum owed.

The story is developing. Please refresh for updates.
 
Back
Top