"Men Are Better Than Women", by Dick Masterson

i post this before but good to get this again.
 
perfect illustration


<iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/T0xoKiH8JJM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>






his ex-model targets married tycoons for their money.

Her coup? Getting one to divorce his wife and marry her

He's not handsome. Never mind. He's married. So what?

What matters most is that he's rich and, given his social status, he has the potential to be her ticket to the high life.

And indeed she did have it all.

A short fling - lasting about six months - with the "stout and ugly" business tycoon opened the right doors for this former model.

The Singaporean is now happily married to another business tycoon, whom she met through her former lover.

Ms T, who agreed to this interview on the condition that we do not name her, says: "You can call me a gold-digger, I don't care.

"I got my man and, along with it, the lifestyle that I desire. I am happy."

Ms T, who is in her early 30s, admits that it took careful planning before she "deliberately 'accidentally' bumped" into her former lover.

She says: "I knew he had a weakness for girls who are way taller than him and I am, by one head."

But to ensure that she caught his eye at a private function at Velvet Underground, she bought a pair of three-inch stilettoes.

She spent two weeks working in the gym and going for spa treatments - from facials to manicures, and even luxurious soaks.

Ms T, who had secured the invitation through her modelling agency, invested in a $2,000 branded dress that was "both sexy and sweet".

She says: "Before you expect the man to pamper you, you must pamper yourself. "That's the basic rule that women, when they become wives, forget."

Ms T clucks disapprovingly, then adds: "When you turn into a 'huang lian po' (loosely translated as 'sallow-faced woman'), do you think your husband will want to take a second look at you?"

Men, she insists, are "ruled first by their genitals, then their hearts".

She laughs mockingly, then adds: "Don't expect love without the lust. It comes with a price."

Three months into her affair with her former lover, Ms T realised that "he was not ever going to leave his equally rich wife".

She says: "He doted on me and showered me with lavish gifts, but it soon became clear that I'd never be the No. 1."

While he was generous with gifts, he was stingy with cash, she adds.

"It's like, you can get him to buy you stuff but don't expect him to hand over cold, hard cash."

That was when Ms T started to plan her escape route - with an option that would lead to "another pot of gold".

She soon set her eyes on a "younger and better-looking" businessman - albeit not as rich. "He was good enough for me," she said.

But she hit a slight snag: He was married, with a young child.

Says Ms T: "I was irritated because I was less confident of turning the situation in my favour.

"Also, it was known in social circles that he was a reasonably decent man, which meant that my chances were much slimmer."

Not that she was about to give up.

Ms T declined to provide the full details as she didn't want to "create the unnecessary impression" that she does not love her husband, should he chance upon this report.

Suffice it to say, she succeeded in snaring the man. He proposed to her in 2008.

She says: "Once I managed to convince him that we are very much in love with each other, the rest was easy."

But when her husband's divorce threatened to turn messy, Ms T approached the ex-wife.

And here is another trick that she says "all wives should learn".

She says: "Don't be dumb. When love is gone, don't hang onto it like an idiot.

"Cut your losses and get out quickly, and if the man can afford it, make sure you get as much out of the break-up as you can."

And that was the point that Ms T drove home during her discussion with the ex-wife, she claims.

"It was easier because she wanted custody of their child - and I made good my promise to her that she'd get it," says Ms T.

Now that she is married to the man who once cheated on his wife, she says she's smart enough to make the right moves.

"I give him enough freedom to do what he wants.

"But I won't ever be stupid to let him get too close to any gold-diggers," she adds.
 
just like some said

all women are chicken, the difference are that some are for domestic consumption and other public consumption.

of course i disagree.
 
Last edited:
This is interesting,

why woman who want money can't do it by having businesses and high paying job,

but do stuffs like breaking a family up ( even the one with a kid) of a rich man and get free expensive lifes.

i dun get it... and i get guess, there are a number of stupid men out there who support such women.

money only.. what is the big fucking deal about it?
 
i dun get it... and i get guess, there are a number of stupid men out there who support such women.
This seems to be the only root cause that makes sense to me, even though I don't consider myself a proper "Christian":

Genesis Chapter 3
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/gen003.htm

1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.

7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

8 And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.

9 And the LORD God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?

10 And he said, I heard thy voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.

11 And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

12 And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

13 And the LORD God said unto the woman, What is this that thou hast done? And the woman said, The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.

14 And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.

20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.

22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.

24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
 
Last edited:
This seems to be the only root cause that makes sense to me, even though I don't consider myself a proper "Christian":

Genesis Chapter 3
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/kjv/gen003.htm

1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

So, who's the original liar/sinner again? White lie is still a lie.

Read this:

http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/onwomen.html

On Women by Arthur Schopenhauer

Absorb this paragraph:
It is because women’s reasoning powers are weaker that they show more sympathy for the unfortunate than men, and consequently take a kindlier interest in them. On the other hand, women are inferior to men in matters of justice, honesty, and conscientiousness. Again, because their reasoning faculty is weak, things clearly visible and real, and belonging to the present, exercise a power over them which is rarely counteracted by abstract thoughts, fixed maxims, or firm resolutions, in general, by regard for the past and future or by consideration for what is absent and remote. Accordingly they have the first and principal qualities of virtue, but they lack the secondary qualities which are often a necessary instrument in developing it. Women may be compared in this respect to an organism that has a liver but no gall-bladder.9 So that it will be found that the fundamental fault in the character of women is that they have no “sense of justice.” This arises from their deficiency in the power of reasoning already referred to, and reflection, but is also partly due to the fact that Nature has not destined them, as the weaker sex, to be dependent on strength but on cunning; this is why they are instinctively crafty, and have an ineradicable tendency to lie.
 
What did he say in the last part that makes the woman speachless ??

Don't often listen to Americans speak, do you?

Dick Masterson: "... (women are lining up to date me)"

Woman: "(...no woman will line up to date you... I'll be at the end of the line.")

Dick Masterson: "If you hit the treadmill more you'll be at the front of the line."

In other words: "You're fat, bitch! Take a number and wait long long."
 
So, who's the original liar/sinner again?
The original sinner is the Devil (together with all those demons who followed his leadership), followed by the first woman (Eve) who ever lived, and then the first man (Adam) who ever lived, according to Christian teaching, if I'm not mistaken.


In other words: "You're fat, bitch! Take a number and wait long long."
Actually, I don't think that was Dick's intention, or at least that wasn't his only intention...

He was actually trying to prove male chauvinism to her by implying that if she were hardworking, physically fit and sexy enough, he would want to date her, and that she would also want to date him because he would like her a lot and would be willing to spend money on her.

So that made her speechless for a few moments because she had no defence against his reasoning and indirect seduction! haha
This caused Dick to win the debate, especially after she said that she didn't hear him, when it was so obvious that she and the audience behind her had heard him loud and clear, which was why they reacted with "Awww"! haha
 
Last edited:
i love one of the comments in youtube:

"when the women open their mouth, i start to support Dick"


haha... and his name is Dick.. very perfect for his Male Chauvinistic image.
 
one more comment from youtuber which i think is so fucking right:


A man's goal in life is sex. A woman's goal in life is security. Woman tend to take it as an insult, due to theire extra sensitivity, that a man would just want them as an object of affection, even though that is generally the extent of what they are capable of.. Affection is enouph for men, but it seems for woman nothing is ever enouph. The trick if youre a man is to make them FEEL as if they are more than just that, or you give them what the subcounciously craves: DOMINANCE
 
Last edited:
Back
Top