• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

MCI shortens permit to Vogue Singapore for content guideline breaches: report

EunoiaJAYCEE

Alfrescian
Loyal
1665728487643.png



A ministry spoksperson told The Straits Times that it had revoked the magazine's one-year permit from Thursday (13 October). Vogue Singapore has since reapplied, and MCI has issued it a six-month permit instead.

"(Vogue Singapore) had breached the content guidelines for local lifestyle magazines on four occasions within the past two years, for nudity and content that promoted non-traditional families," MCI said in its reply.

The ministry added that during the period of Vogue Singapore's breaches, the content guidelines have remained the same, and the magazine is required to comply with these guidelines as part of its permit conditions.

These conditions include not undermining prevailing social norms.

MCI last shortened permit in 2014​

According to The Straits Times, the last time a permit was shortened was when action was taken against local arts magazine Art Republik in 2014, for two severe breaches of content guidelines for religiously insensitive and denigrative content.

There were two earlier cases - women's magazine Cleo in 2008 and men's magazine Singapore FHM in 1998 - where magazines had committed repeated breaches pertaining to content on sex, nudity and the promotion of promiscuity and a permissive lifestyle.

https://www.msn.com/en-sg/news/sing...content-guideline-breaches-report/ar-AA12WrVH
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There were two earlier cases - women's magazine Cleo in 2008 and men's magazine Singapore FHM in 1998 - where magazines had committed repeated breaches pertaining to content on sex, nudity and the promotion of promiscuity and a permissive lifestyle.

It's a women's magazine! What were the PAP technocrats expecting? :rolleyes:
 
Top